Attention to inattention: Effect of the other’s attentional state on visual search performance in chimpanzees

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the effects of the other’s triadic attention to objects on visual search performances in chimpanzees. We found the search-asymmetry-like effect of the other’s attentional state; the chimpanzees searched a target object not attended by the other individual more efficiently than that attended (Experiment 1). Additional experiments explored the possibility that the other individual “holding an object but not looking at it” led to expectancy violation (Experiment 2) or the role of nonsocial cues such as the proximity relation between the head and the object (Experiment 3). Still, these accounts alone did not explain this effect. It was also shown that the other’s attentional state affected the chimpanzees’ performances more readily as the interference effect than the facilitation effect (Experiment 4). Furthermore, the same effect was observed in the visual search for the gaze (head direction) of others (Experiment 5). We obtained the same results using photographs of chimpanzees (Experiment 6). Contrary to the chimpanzees, humans detected the object to which attention was directed more efficiently than vice versa (Experiment 7). The present results may reflect species differences between chimpanzees and humans in processing triadic social attention.

Keywords

visual search goal-directed action gaze social attention chimpanzees

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bard

K. A.

Myowa-Yamakoshi

Tomonaga

Tanaka

Costall

Matsuzawa

(2005). Group differences in the mutual gaze of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Developmental Psychology, 41, 616–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.616.

Bartoń

(2022). MuMIn: multi-model inference . R package version 1.46.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.

Beier

J. S.

Spelke

E. S

. (2012). Infants’ developing understanding of social gaze. Child Development, 83, 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01702.x.

Bindemann

Burton

A. M.

Langton

S. R. H.

Schweinberger

S. R.

Doherty

M. J.

(2007). The control of attention to faces. Journal of Vision, 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.10.15.

Biro

Sousa

Matsuzawa

(2006). Ontogeny and cultural propagation of tool use by wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea: Case studies in nut cracking and leaf folding. In Matsuzawa

Tomonaga

Tanaka

(Eds.), Cognitive development in chimpanzees (pp. 476–508). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-30248-4_28.

Biro

Leslie

A. M.

(2007). Infants’ perception of goal-directed actions: Development through cue-based bootstrapping. Developmental Science, 10, 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00544.x.

Cannon

E. N.

Woodward

A. L.

(2012). Infants generate goal-based action predictions. Developmental Science, 15, 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01127.x.

Dahl

C. D.

Rasch

M. J.

Tomonaga

Adachi

(2013). The face inversion effect in nonhuman primates revisited—An investigation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Scientific Reports, 3, 2504. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02504.

Downing

C. J.

(1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.2.188.

10.

Driver IV

Davis

Ricciardelli

Kidd

Maxwell

Baron-Cohen

. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6, 509–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062899394920.

11.

Egly

Driver

Rafal

R. D.

(1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.161.

12.

Emery

N. J.

Lorincz

E. N.

Perrett

D. I.

Oram

M. W.

Baker

C. I.

(1997). Gaze following and joint attention in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.111.3.286.

13.

Farroni

Csibra

Simion

Johnson

M. H.

(2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9602–9605. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152159999.

14.

Flavell

J. C.

Over

Vestner

Cook

Tipper

S. P.

Steinborn

M. B.

(2022). Rapid detection of social interactions is the result of domain general attentional processes. PLoS One, 17, e0258832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258832.

15.

Friesen

C. K.

Kingstone

(1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 490–495. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208827.

16.

Frischen

Bayliss

A. P.

Tipper

S. P.

(2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694.

17.

Gao

Kawakami

Tomonaga

(2020). Body perception in chimpanzees and humans: The expert effect. Scientific Reports, 10, 7148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63876-x.

18.

Gao

Tomonaga

Addessi

(2018). The body inversion effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). PLoS One, 13, e0204131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204131.

19.

Gao

Tomonaga

(2020a). Body perception in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): The effect of body structure changes. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 134, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000214.

20.

Gao

Tomonaga

(2020b). How chimpanzees and children perceive other species’ bodies: Comparing the expert effect. Developmental Science, 23, e12975. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12975.

21.

Goodall

(1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Belknap Press.

22.

Green

Hummel

J. E.

(2006). Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1107–1119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1107.

23.

Handy

T. C.

Kingstone

Mangun

G. R.

(1996). Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 613–627. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213094.

24.

Hermens

(2017). The effects of social and symbolic cues on visual search: Cue shape trumps biological relevance. Psihologija, 50, 117–140. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI161005003H.

25.

Hirata

Celli

M. L.

(2003). Role of mothers in the acquisition of tool-use behaviours by captive infant chimpanzees. Animal Cognition, 6, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0187-6.

26.

Homa

Haver

Schwartz

(1976). Perceptibility of schematic face stimuli: Evidence for a perceptual Gestalt. Memory & Cognition, 4, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213162.

27.

Hopper

L. M.

Gulli

R. A.

Howard

L. H.

Kano

Krupenye

Ryan

A. M.

Paukner

(2021). The application of noninvasive, restraint-free eye-tracking methods for use with nonhuman primates. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1003–1030. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01465-6.

28.

Itakura

(2004). Gaze-following and joint visual attention in nonhuman animals. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5584.2004.00253.x.

29.

Johnson

C. M.

Karin-D'Arcy

M. R

. (2006). Social attention in nonhuman primates: A behavioral review. Aquatic Mammals, 32, 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.32.4.2006.423.

30.

Kano

Call

(2014). Great apes generate goal-based action predictions: An eye-tracking study. Psychological Science, 25, 1691–1698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614536402.

31.

Kano

Hirata

(2015). Great apes make anticipatory looks based on long-term memory of single events. Current Biology, 25, 2513–2517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.004.

32.

Kano

Tomonaga

(2009). How chimpanzees look at pictures: A comparative eye-tracking study. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 1949–1955. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1811.

33.

Kano

Tomonaga

(2011). Species difference in the timing of gaze movement between chimpanzees and humans. Animal Cognition, 14, 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0422-5.

34.

Kosugi

Murai

Tomonaga

Tanaka

Isihida

Itakura

(2003). Relationship between causal understanding of movements of objects and social referencing: Direct comparisons between chimpanzee and human infants. In Tomonaga

Tanaka

Matsuzawa

(Eds.), Cognitive and behavioral development in chimpanzees: A comparative approach (pp. 232–242). Kyoto University Press. (Japanese text only).

35.

Koyasu

Kikusui

Takagi

Nagasawa

(2020). The gaze communications between dogs/cats and humans: Recent research review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 613512, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613512.

36.

Kravitz

D. J.

Behrmann

(2008). The space of an object: Object attention alters the spatial gradient in the surround. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.298.

37.

Kuhn

Pagano

Maani

Bunce

(2015). Age-related decline in the reflexive component of overt gaze following. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.975257.

38.

Kuhn

Tipples

(2011). Increased gaze following for fearful faces. It depends on what you’re looking for!. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0033-1.

39.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H

. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.

40.

Langton

S. R.

Bruce

. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6, 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062899394939.

41.

Langton

S. R. H.

O’Donnell

Riby

D. M.

Ballantyne

C. J.

(2006). Gaze cues influence the allocation of attention in natural scene viewing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2056–2064. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600917884.

42.

ManyPrimates (2019a). Establishing an infrastructure for collaboration in primate cognition research. PLoS One, 14, e0223675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223675.

43.

ManyPrimates (2019b). Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205.

44.

Matsuno

(2021). Visual body perception in primates: From individual to social dyad. In J. R. Anderson, & H. Kuroshima (Eds.), Comparative cognition: Commonalities and diversity (pp. 83–103). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2028-7_6.

45.

Matsuzawa

(2006). Sociocognitive development in chimpanzees: A synthesis of laboratory work and fieldwork. In Matsuzawa

Tomonaga

Tanaka

(Eds.), Cognitive development in chimpanzees (pp. 3–33). Springer.

46.

Matsuzawa

Tomonaga

Tanaka

(Eds.). (2006). Cognitive development in chimpanzees. Springer.

47.

Moore

Dunham

P. J.

(Eds.). (1995). Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

48.

Müller

H. J.

Rabbitt

P. M.

(1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.315.

49.

Myowa-Yamakoshi

Scola

Hirata

(2012). Humans and chimpanzees attend differently to goal-directed actions. Nature Communications, 3, 693. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1695.

50.

Myowa-Yamakoshi

Tomonaga

(2001). Perceiving eye gaze in an infant gibbon (Hylobates agilis). Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 44, 24–30.

51.

Myowa-Yamakoshi

Tomonaga

Tanaka

Matsuzawa

(2003). Preference for human direct gaze in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Cognition, 89, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00071-4.

52.

Myowa-Yamakoshi

Yoshida

Hirata

Kendal

R. L.

(2015). Humans but not chimpanzees vary face-scanning patterns depending on contexts during action observation. PLoS One, 10, e0139989. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139989.

53.

Nishida

Corp

Hamai

Hasegawa

Hiraiwa-Hasegawa

Hosaka

Hunt

K. D.

Itoh

Kawanaka

Matsumoto-Oda

Mitani

J. C.

Nakamura

Norikoshi

Sakamaki

Turner

Uehara

Zamma

(2003). Demography, female life history, and reproductive profiles among the chimpanzees of Mahale. American Journal of Primatology, 59, 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.10068.

54.

Okamoto

Tanaka

Tomonaga

(2004). Looking back: The “representational mechanism” of joint attention in an infant chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5584.2004.00255.x.

55.

Okamoto

Tomonaga

Ishii

Kawai

Tanaka

Matsuzawa

(2002). An infant chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) follows human gaze. Animal Cognition, 5, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-002-0133-z.

56.

Pack

A. A.

Herman

L. M.

(2006). Dolphin social cognition and joint attention: Our current understanding. Aquatic Mammals, 32, 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.32.4.2006.443.

57.

Papeo

(2020). Twos in human visual perception. Cortex, 132, 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.005.

58.

Papeo

Abassi

(2019). Seeing social events: The visual specialization for dyadic human–human interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45, 877–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000646.

59.

Papeo

Goupil

Soto-Faraco

(2019). Visual search for people among people. Psychological Science, 30, 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619867295.

60.

Parr

L. A.

Dove

Hopkins

W. D.

(1998). Why faces may be special: Evidence of the inversion effect in chimpanzees. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998563013.

61.

Perrett

D. I.

Hietanen

J. K.

Oram

M. W.

Benson

P. J

. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 335, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1992.0003.

62.

Posner

M. I.

(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231.

63.

R Core Team (2022). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

64.

Reijnen

Wolfe

J. M.

Krummenacher

(2013). Coarse guidance by numerosity in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0379-8.

65.

Scholl

B. J.

(2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00152-9.

66.

Senju

Hasegawa

(2005). Direct gaze captures visuospatial attention. Visual Cognition, 12, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000157.

67.

Seow

Fleming

S. M.

(2019). Perceptual sensitivity is modulated by what others can see. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 1979–1990. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01724-5.

68.

Simpson

E. A.

Paukner

Pedersen

E. J.

Ferrari

P. F.

Parr

L. A.

(2019). Visual preferences for direct-gaze faces in infant macaques (Macaca mulatta) with limited face exposure. Developmental Psychobiology, 61, 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21797.

69.

Siposova

Carpenter

(2019). A new look at joint attention and common knowledge. Cognition, 189, 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.019.

70.

Sousa

Okamoto

Matsuzawa

(2003). Behavioural development in a matching-to-sample task and token use by an infant chimpanzee reared by his mother. Animal Cognition, 6, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0186-7.

71.

Stahl

A. E.

Kibbe

M. M.

(2022). Great expectations: The construct validity of the violation-of-expectation method for studying infant cognition. Infant and Child Development, 31, e2359. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2359.

72.

Stephenson

L. J.

Edwards

S. G.

Bayliss

A. P.

(2021). From gaze perception to social cognition: The shared-attention system. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16, 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620953773.

73.

Striano

Stahl

(2005). Sensitivity to triadic attention in early infancy. Developmental Science, 8, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00421.x.

74.

Suzuki

Cavanagh

(1995). Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.901.

75.

Tanaka

Tomonaga

Matsuzawa

Kawai

(2003). Acquisition of touchpanel task by infant chimpanzees. In Tomonaga

Tanaka

Matsuzawa

(Eds.), Cognitive and behavioral development in chimpanzees (pp. 267–270). Kyoto University Press. (Japanese text).

76.

Tomasello

(1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In Moore

Dunham

P. J.

(Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103–130). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

77.

Tomasello

(2022). The coordination of attention and action in great apes and humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1859), 20210093. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0093.

78.

Tomasello

Call

(1997). Primate cognition. Oxford University Press.

79.

Tomasello

Call

Hare

(1998). Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0636.

80.

Tomasello

Carpenter

Call

Behne

Moll

(2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000129.

81.

Tomonaga

(1993). A search for search asymmetry in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.76.3c.1287.

82.

Tomonaga

(1999). Inversion effect in perception of human faces in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Primates, 40, 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557579.

83.

Tomonaga

(2001a). Investigating visual perception and cognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) through visual search and related tasks: From basic to complex processes. In Matsuzawa

(Ed.), Primate origin of human cognition and behavior (pp. 55–86). Springer.

84.

Tomonaga

(2001b). Visual search for biological motion patterns in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 44, 46–59.

85.

Tomonaga

(2007a). Visual search for orientation of faces by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Face-specific upright superiority and the role of facial configural properties. Primates, 48, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-006-0011-4.

86.

Tomonaga

. (2007b). Is chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) spatial attention reflexively triggered by the gaze cue? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.156.

87.

Tomonaga

(2010a). Do the chimpanzee eyes have it? In Lonsdorf

E. V.

Ross

S. R.

Matsuzawa

(Eds.), The mind of the chimpanzee: Ecological and empirical perspectives (pp. 42–59). University of Chicago Press.

88.

Tomonaga

(2010b). Perception of social stimuli in chimpanzees with special respect to face and gaze perception. Japanese Psychological Review, 53, 298–314. (Japanese text with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.24602/sjpr.53.3_298.

89.

Tomonaga

Imura

(2009a). Faces capture the visuospatial attention of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Evidence from a cueing experiment. Frontiers in Zoology, 6, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-6-14.

90.

Tomonaga

Imura

(2009b). Human gestures trigger different attentional shifts in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 12, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0268-2.

91.

Tomonaga

Imura

(2010). Visual search for human gaze direction by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). PLoS One, 5, e9131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009131.

92.

Tomonaga

Imura

(2015). Efficient search for a face by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Scientific Reports, 5, 11437. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11437.

93.

Tomonaga

Imura

. (2023). Going forward: Perceptual bias for forward-facing motion in chimpanzees. Primates, 64, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-022-01034-9.

94.

Tomonaga

Tanaka

Matsuzawa

(2003). Cognitive and behavioral development in chimpanzees: A comparative approach. Kyoto University Press. (Japanese text only).

95.

Tomonaga

Tanaka

Matsuzawa

Myowa-Yamakoshi

Kosugi

Mizuno

Okamoto

Yamaguchi

M. K.

Bard

K. A.

(2004). Development of social cognition in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Face recognition, smiling, gaze, and the lack of triadic interactions1. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5584.2004.00254.x.

96.

Ueno

Matsuzawa

(2005). Response to novel food in infant chimpanzees: Do infants refer to mothers before ingesting food on their own? Behavioural Processes, 68, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2004.09.002.

97.

Ushitani

Imura

Tomonaga

(2010). Object-based attention in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Vision Research, 50, 577–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.01.003.

98.

Vecera

S. P.

Johnson

M. H.

(1995). Gaze detection and the cortical processing of faces: Evidence from infants and adults. Visual Cognition, 2, 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506289508401722.

99.

Vestner

Gray

K. L. H.

Cook

(2021a). Visual search for facing and non-facing people: The effect of actor inversion. Cognition, 208, 104550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104550.

100.

Vestner

Over

Gray

K. L. H.

Tipper

S. P.

Cook

(2021b). Searching for people: Non-facing distractor pairs hinder the visual search of social scenes more than facing distractor pairs. Cognition, 214, 104737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104737.

101.

Vestner

Tipper

S. P.

Hartley

Over

Rueschemeyer

S.-A.

(2019). Bound together: Social binding leads to faster processing, spatial distortion, and enhanced memory of interacting partners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 1251–1268. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000545.

102.

von Grünau

Anston

(1995). The detection of gaze direction: A stare-in-the-crowd effect. Perception, 24, 1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1068/p241297.

103.

Wilson

D. A.

Tomonaga

Chao

(2018). Exploring attentional bias towards threatening faces in chimpanzees using the dot probe task. PLoS One, 13, e0207378. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207378.

104.

Wilson

D. A.

Tomonaga

(2022). Search asymmetries for threatening faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 136, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000302.

105.

Woodward

A. L.

(1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00058-4.

106.

Woodward

A. L.

(1999). Infants’ ability to distinguish between purposeful and non-purposeful behaviors. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(99)00007-7.

107.

Yeshurun

Carrasco

(1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research, 39, 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00114-X.

108.

Yin

Duan

Shen

(2018). Object-based attention on social units: Visual selection of hands performing a social interaction. Psychological Science, 29, 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617749636.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB

2.45 MB