Existent studies have demonstrated that being physically attractive leads to preferences and rewards in various scenarios involving performance evaluation. In this study, we explored whether a photographer’s physical attractiveness could affect others’ assessment of a photograph’s aesthetic value. Participants () accomplished an online task to pair portraits and non-portrait photographs, followed by completing two questionnaires on cognitive reflection and empathy. Analytical results revealed that an attractive photographer was more likely to be associated with a highly aesthetic photograph, and this bias was moderated by the participant’s level of cognitive reflection and empathy. Meanwhile, it could be reduced by the participant’s professional experience.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
2.
ChingC. C.WangX. C.ShihM. -L.KedemY. (2006). Digital photography and journals in a kindergarten-first-grade classroom: Toward meaningful technology integration in early childhood education. Early Education & Development, 17, 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1703_3
3.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
GergerG.PelowskiM.IshizuT. (2019). Does priming negative emotions really contribute to more positive aesthetic judgments? A comparative study of emotion priming paradigms using emotional faces versus emotional scenes and multiple negative emotions with fEMG. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 19, 1396–1413. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000528
7.
GergerG.PelowskiM.LederH. (2017). Empathy, einfühlung, and aesthetic experience: The effect of emotion contagion on appreciation of representational and abstract art using fEMG and SCR. Cognitive Processing, 19, 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0800-2
8.
GreenP.MacLeodC. J. (2016). Simr: An r package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
9.
HaanstraF.DamenM.-L.van HoornM. (2013). Interestingness and pleasingness of drawings from different age and expertise groups. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 31,173–194. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.31.2.EOV.2
10.
LandyD.SigallH. (1974). Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer’s physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036018
11.
MüllerB. C. N.Van LeeuwenM. L.Van BaarenR. B.BekkeringH.DijksterhuisA. (2013). Empathy is a beautiful thing: Empathy predicts imitation only for attractive others. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12060
12.
PelowskiM. (2015). Tears and transformation: Feeling like crying as an indicator of insightful or “aesthetic” experience with art. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1006. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01006
13.
PelowskiM.GergerG.ChetouaniY.MarkeyP. S.LederH. (2017). But is it really art? the classification of images as “art”/“not art” and correlation with appraisal and viewer interpersonal differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01729
14.
PelowskiM.GraserA.SpeckerE.ForsterM.von HinüberJ.LederH. (2019). Does gallery lighting really have an impact on appreciation of art? An ecologically valid study of lighting changes and the assessment and emotional experience with representational and abstract paintings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02148
PuveendrakumaranP.FervahaG.CaravaggioF.RemingtonG. (2020). Assessing analytic and intuitive reasoning using the cognitive reflection test in young patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 284, 112683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112683
17.
RabbN.NisselJ.AlecciA.MagidL.AmbrosoliJ.WinnerE. (2016). Truths about beauty and goodness: Disgust affects moral but not aesthetic judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000051
18.
SchneiderT. M.CarbonC. -C. (2017). Taking the perfect selfie: Investigating the impact of perspective on the perception of higher cognitive variables. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 971. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00971
TurpinM. H.Kara-YakoubianM.WalkerA.GabertN. N.FugelsangJ.StolzJ. A. (2019). Bullshit makes the art grow profounder. SSRN Electronic Journal, 14, 658–670. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3410674
21.
WapnickJ.DarrowA. A.KovacsJ.DalrympleL. (1997). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45,470–479. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345540
22.
WapnickJ.MazzaJ. K.DarrowA. A. (2000). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on evaluation of children’s piano performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 323–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345367
23.
WenW.LiJ.GeorgiouG. K.HuangC.WangL. (2020). Reducing the halo effect by stimulating analytic thinking. Social Psychology, 51, 334–340. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000418
