BalcetisE. (2016).
Approach and avoidance as organizing structures for motivated distance perception. Emotion Review,
8, 115–128.
2.
BalcetisE.DunningD. (2010).
Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science,
21, 147–152.
3.
BlockN. (2016).
Tweaking the concepts of perception and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
39, 21–22.
4.
BurrowA. L.HillP. L.SumnerR. (2016).
Leveling mountains: Purpose attenuates links between perceptions of effort and steepness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
42, 94–103.
5.
Cañal-BrulandR.van der KampJ.GrayR. (2016).
Acting is perceiving!Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
39, e233.
6.
EasterbrookJ. A. (1959).
The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review,
66, 183–201.
7.
ErdelyiM. H. (1974).
A new look at the New Look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review,
81, 1–25.
8.
FirestoneC.SchollB. J. (2016).
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
39, 1–72.
9.
GilchristA. (2014).
A gestalt account of lightness illusions. Perception,
43, 881–895.
10.
GilchristA. (2020).
The integrity of vision. Perception,
49, 999–1024.
11.
GormanJ. L.HarberK. D.ShiffrarM.QuigleyK. S. (2016).
Ostracism, resources, and the perception of human motion. European Journal of Social Psychology,
47, 53–71.
12.
GreenwaldA. G. (1992).
New Look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist,
47, 766–779.
13.
GrossE. B.ProffittD. (2013).
The economy of social resources and its influence on spatial perceptions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
7, 772.
14.
HarberK. D.Einev, ‐CohenM.LangF. (2008).
They heard a cry: Psychosocial resources moderate perception of others’ distress. European Journal of Social Psychology,
38, 296–314.
15.
HarberK. D.YeungD.IacovelliA. (2011).
Psychosocial resources, threat, and the perception of distance and height: Support for the Resources and Perception Model. Emotion,
11, 1080–1090.
16.
HobfollS. E. (1989).
Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist,
44, 513–524.
17.
HuynhS.SteffanucciJ. K.AspinwallL. G. (2014).
Self-affirmation counters the effects of self-regulatory depletion on height perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
52, 96–100.
18.
KuhnT. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions.
University of Chicago Press.
19.
LupyanG. (2015).
Cognitive penetrability of perception in the age of prediction: Predictive systems are penetrable systems. Review of Philosophy and Psychology,
6, 547–569.
20.
LupyanG.ClarkA. (2015).
Words and the world: Predictive coding and the language- perception-cognition interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
24, 279–284.
21.
LupyanG.StokesD.MacphersonF.RahmanR. A.GoldstoneR. (2013).
Is perception cognitively penetrable? A philosophically satisfying and empirically testable reframing. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,
1, 91–92.
22.
MacPhersonF. (2012).
Cognitive penetration of colour experience: Rethinking the issue in light of an indirect mechanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
84, 24–62.
23.
MarchiF.NewenA. (2015).
Cognitive penetrability and emotion recognition in human facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology,
6, 1–12.
24.
MarxM. H.HillixW. A. (1963). Systems and theories in psychology.
McGraw-Hill.
25.
OishiS.SchillerJ.GrossE. B. (2012).
Felt understanding and misunderstanding affect the perception of pain, slant, and distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science,
4, 259–266.
26.
PhelpsE. A.LingS.CarrascoM. (2006).
Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science,
17, 292–299.
27.
ProffittD. R. (2006).
Distance perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
15, 131–135.
28.
SchnallS.HarberK. D.StefanucciJ.ProffittD. (2008).
Social support and the perception of geographical slant. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology,
44, 1246–1255.
29.
SilinsN. (2016).
Cognitive penetration and the epistemology of perception. Philosophy Compass,
11, 24–42.
30.
SlepianM. L.MasicampoE. J.AmbadyN. (2013).
Relieving the burdens of secrecy: Revealing secrets influences judgments of hill slant and distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science,
5, 293–300.
31.
StefanucciJ. K.GagnonK. T.LessardD. A. (2011).
Follow your heart: Emotion adaptively influences perception. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,
5/6, 296–308.
32.
StokesD. (2012).
Perceiving and desiring: A new look at the cognitive penetrability of experience. Philosophical Studies,
158, 477–492.
33.
StokesD. (2013).
Cognitive penetrability of perception. Philosophy Compass,
8, 646–663.
34.
StokesD. (2018).
Attention and the cognitive penetrability of perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy,
96, 303–318.
35.
VagnoniE.LourencoS. F.LongoM. R. (2012).
Threat modulates perception of looming visual stimuli. Current Biology,
22, R826–R827.
36.
van UlzenN. R.SeminG. R.OudejansR. R.BeekP. J. (2008).
Affective stimulus properties influence size perception and the Ebbinghaus illusion. Psychological Research,
72, 304–310.
37.
WuW. (2013).
Visual spatial constancy and modularity: Does intention penetrate vision?Philosophical Studies,
165, 647–669.