The Oppel–Kundt illusion consists in the overestimation of the length of filled versus empty extents. Two experiments explored its relation to the horizontal-vertical illusion, which consists in the overestimation of the length of vertical versus horizontal extents, and to the oblique effect, which consists in poorer discriminative sensitivity for obliquely as opposed to horizontally or vertically oriented stimuli. For Experiment 1, Kundt’s (1863) original stimulus was rotated in steps of 45° full circle around 360°. For Experiment 2, one part of the stimulus remained at a horizontal or vertical orientation, whereas the other part was tilted 45° or 90°. The Oppel–Kundt illusion was at its maximum at a horizontal orientation of the stimulus. The illusion was strongly attenuated with L-type figures when the vertical part was empty, but not enhanced when this part was filled, suggesting that the horizontal-vertical illusion only acts on nontextured extents. There was no oblique effect.
AppelleS. (1972).
Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin,
78, 266–278.
2.
AveryG. C.DayR. H. (1969).
Basis of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
81, 376–380.
3.
BarlowH. B.ReevesB. C. (1979).
The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vision Research,
19, 783–793.
4.
BertulisA.BulatovA. (2005).
Distortions in length perception: Visual field anisotropy and geometrical illusions. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology,
35, 423–434.
5.
CaiY.WangC.SongC.LiZ. (2017).
Connectedness underlies the underestimation of the horizontal vertical illusion in L-shaped configurations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
79, 1217–1226.
6.
CollierE. S.LawsonR. (2016).
Defining filled and empty space: Reassessing the filled space illusion for active touch and vision. Experimental Brain Research,
234, 2697–2708.
7.
CorenS.GirgusJ. S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions.
Erlbaum.
8.
CormackE. O.CormackR. H. (1974).
Stimulus configuration and line orientation in the horizontal-vertical illusion. Perception & Psychophysics,
16, 208–212.
EbbinghausH. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis [On memory].
Duncker & Humblot.
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007).
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods,
39, 175–191.
12.
FickA. (1851). Tractatur de errore optico quodam asymetria bulbi oculi effecto [On optical errors effected by the asymmetry of the ocular bulbi]. Koch.
13.
FingerF. W.SpeltD. K. (1947).
The illustration of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
37, 243–250.
14.
HansenB. C.EssockE. A. (2004).
A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes. Journal of Vision,
4, 1044–1060.
15.
HouckR. L.MefferdR. B.GreensteinG. J. (1972).
Influence of a visual frame and vertical-horizontal illusion on shape and size perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
96, 273–279.
16.
JohannsenD. E. (1971).
Early history of perceptual illusions. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences,
7, 127–140.
17.
KundtA. (1863).
Untersuchungen über Augenmass und optische Täuschungen [Investigations on measurement by eye and optical illusions]. Poggendorffs Annalen Der Physik Und Chemie,
120, 118–158.
18.
KünnapasT. M. (1955).
An analysis of the “vertical-horizontal illusion.” Journal of Experimental Psychology,
49, 134–140.
19.
LandwehrK. (2014). Visual and visually mediated haptic illusions with Titchener’s ⊥. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics,
76, 1151–1159.
20.
LandwehrK. (2017).
Titchener’s ⊥ with its lines tilted – A partial replication and extension of Cormack and Cormack (1974). Attention, Perception & Psychophysics,
79, 223–229.
21.
LehmannD.SkrandiesW. (1979).
Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemi-retina systems. Experimental Brain Research,
35, 151–159.
22.
LevineM. W.McAnanyJ. J. (2005).
The relative capabilities of the upper and lower visual hemifields. Vision Research,
45, 2820–2830.
23.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (1997).
The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature,
390, 279–281.
24.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (2013).
Visual working memory capacity: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
17, 391–400.
25.
MacmillanN. A.CreelmanC. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.).
Erlbaum.
26.
MamassianP.de MontalembertM. (2010).
A simple model of the vertical-horizontal illusion. Vision Research,
50, 956–962.
27.
MikellidouK.ThompsonP. (2013).
The vertical-horizontal illusion: Assessing the contributions of anisotropy, abutting, and crossing to the misperception of simple line stimuli. Journal of Vision,
13, 7.
28.
MikellidouK.ThompsonP. (2014).
Crossing the line: Estimations of line length in the Oppel-Kundt illusion. Journal of Vision,
14, 20.
29.
MorganM. J.HoleG. J.GlennersterA. (1990).
Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions. Vision Research,
30, 1793–1810.
30.
OppelJ. J. (1860–1861). Ueber Geometrisch-Optische Täuschungen (Zweite Nachlese) [On geometrical-optical illusions (second gleanings)]. Jahresberichte Des Physikalischen Vereins Frankfurt, 26–37.
31.
RobinsonJ. O. (1972). The psychology of visual illusion.
Hutchinson.
32.
SanfordE. C. (1898). A course in experimental psychology.
Heath.
33.
SleightR. B.AustinT. R. (1952).
The horizontal-vertical illusion in plane geometric figures. The Journal of Psychology,
33, 279–287.
34.
SpiegelH.-G. (1937).
Über den Einfluß des Zwischenfeldes auf gesehene Abstände [On effects of the intermediate field on seen interspaces]. Psychologische Forschung,
21, 327–383.
35.
TitchenerE. B. (1901). Experimental psychology (
Vol. 1, Pt. 1).
Macmillan.
36.
VerrilloR. T.IrvinG. (1979).
Absolute estimation of line length as a function of orientation and contrast polarity. Sensory Processes,
3, 261–274.
37.
WackermannJ.KastnerK. (2009).
Paradoxical form of filled/empty optical illusion. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis,
69, 560–563.
WundtW. (1898).
Die geometrisch-optischen Täuschungen [The geometrical-optical illusions]. Abhandlungen der mathematisch-physischen Classe der Königlichen Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig,
24, 55–178.
