For over 2000 years, the pictorial line has been recognized as being fundamental to drawing and several other art forms. Yet pictorial lines present intriguing issues, three of which are considered here: lines very rarely exist in the natural world; there is no known part of the brain which “processes” lines; and, paradoxically, we often pay very little attention to the lines themselves, and they have even been viewed as “an imaginary idea”.
AvenariusH.-J.GerstenbrandF. (1967).
Phantomerlebnisse bei Rückenmarks-Verletzung [Phantom experiences with spinal injury]. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift,
24, 450–453.
2.
BalzacH. de. (1899). The unknown masterpiece (p. 22).
Caxton Publishing Co.
3.
HewishA. (2015).
A line from Klee. Journal of Visual Art Practice,
14, 3–15.
4.
Leonardo da Vinci. (1883). The literary works of Leonardo da Vinci. In J. P. Richter (Ed.) (Vol. 1, Section 47, pp. 28). Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington.
5.
Pliny the Elder. (1952). Natural history. In: H. Rackham (Ed.), Trans., (Vol. 9, Book xxxv.xxxvi, pp. 321–323). Wm. Heinemann; Harvard University Press.
6.
RamachandranV. S.HirsteinW. (1998).
The perception of phantom limbs. The D.O. Hebb lecture. Brain,
121, 1603–1630.
7.
SayimB.CavanaghP. (2011).
What line drawings reveal about the visual brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
5, 1–4.
8.
SchottG. D. (2014).
Revealing the invisible: The paradox of picturing a phantom limb. Brain,
137, 960–969.
9.
WaltherD. B.ChaiB.CaddiganE.BeckD. M.Fei-FeiL. (2011).
Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
108, 9661–9666.
