Observers report seeing as slower a target disk moving in front of a static visual noise (SVN) background than the same object moving in front of a random dynamic visual noise (rDVN) background when the speed is the same. To investigate in which brain region (lower vs. higher visual areas) the background and the target signals might be combined to elicit this misperception, the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered over the early visual cortex (V1/V2), middle temporal area (MT) and Cz (control site) while participants performed a speed discrimination task with targets moving in front of an SVN or an rDVN. Results showed that the TMS over MT reduced the perceived speed of the target moving in front of an SVN, but not when the target was moving in front of an rDVN background. Moreover, the TMS do not seem to interfere with encoding processing but more likely affected decoding processing in conditions of high uncertainty (i.e., when targets have similar speed).
Aaen-StockdaleC.LedgewayT.McGrawP.HessR. F. (2012).
Interaction of first- and second-order signals in the extraction of global-motion and optic-flow. Vision Research,
68, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.004
2.
AdelsonE. H.BergenJ. R. (1985).
Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science,
2, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.2.000284
3.
BattagliniL.CampanaG.CamilleriR.CascoC. (2014).
Probing the involvement of the earliest levels of cortical processing in motion extrapolation with rapid forms of visual motion priming and adaptation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
77, 603–612. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0795-z
4.
BattagliniL.CampanaG.CascoC. (2013).
Illusory speed is retained in memory during invisible motion. i-Perception,
4, 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0562
5.
BattagliniL.ContemoriG.ManigliaM.CascoC. (2016).
Fast moving texture has opposite effects on the perceived speed of visible and occluded object trajectories. Acta Psychologica,
170, 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.08.007
6.
BattagliniL.ManigliaM.KonishiM.ContemoriG.CoccaroA.CascoC. (2018).
Fast random motion biases judgments of visible and occluded motion speed. Vision Research,
158, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2018.08.001
7.
BattagliniL.NoventaS.CascoC. (2017).
Anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation over V5 improves motion perception by signal enhancement and noise reduction. Brain Stimulation,
10, 773–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.128
8.
BoroojerdiB.PragerA.MuellbacherW.CohenL. G. (2000).
Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology,
54, 1529–1531. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.54.7.1529
9.
BraddickO.AtkinsonJ.Wattam-BellJ. (2003).
Normal and anomalous development of visual motion processing: Motion coherence and “dorsal-stream vulnerability. Neuropsychologia,
41, 1769–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00178-7
CampanaG.CoweyA.WalshV. (2002).
Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: A test of perceptual memory. Cerebral Cortex,
12, 663–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/12.6.663
12.
CampanaG.ManigliaM.PavanA. (2013).
Common (and multiple) neural substrates for static and dynamic motion after-effects: A rTMS investigation. Cortex,
49, 2590–2594. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CORTEX.2013.07.001
13.
CampanaG.PavanA.ManigliaM.CascoC. (2011).
The fastest (and simplest), the earliest: The locus of processing of rapid forms of motion aftereffect. Neuropsychologia,
49, 2929–2934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.020
14.
CassanelloC. R.EdwardsM.BadcockD. R.NishidaS. (2011).
No interaction of first- and second-order signals in the extraction of global-motion and optic-flow. Vision Research,
51, 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.012
CoweyA.CampanaG.WalshV.VainaL. M. (2006).
The role of human extra-striate visual areas V5/MT and V2/V3 in the perception of the direction of global motion: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Experimental Brain Research,
171, 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0479-6
EpsteinW.CodyW. J. (1980).
Perception of relative velocity: A revision of the hypothesis of relational determination. Perception,
9, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1068/p090047
19.
GoldJ. I.DingL. (2013).
How mechanisms of perceptual decision-making affect the psychometric function. Progress in Neurobiology,
103, 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNEUROBIO.2012.05.008
HammettS. T.ChampionR. A.ThompsonP. G.MorlandA. B. (2007).
Perceptual distortions of speed at low luminance: Evidence inconsistent with a Bayesian account of speed encoding. Vision Research,
47, 564–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.013
22.
HanksT. D.DitterichJ.ShadlenM. N. (2006).
Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task. Nature Neuroscience,
9, 682–689. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1683
23.
HarrisJ. A.CliffordC. W. G.MiniussiC. (2008).
The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Signal suppression or neural noise generation?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
20, 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20048
24.
HeekerenH. R.MarrettS.RuffD. A.BandettiniP. A.UngerleiderL. G. (2006). Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality. PNAS, 103, 10023–10028. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0603949103
25.
HeekerenH. R.MarrettS.UngerleiderL. G. (2008).
The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience,
9, 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2374
26.
JazayeriM.MovshonJ. A. (2006).
Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations. Nature Neuroscience,
9, 690–696. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1691
27.
JazayeriM.MovshonJ. A. (2007).
A new perceptual illusion reveals mechanisms of sensory decoding. Nature,
446, 912–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05739
28.
KaminskiJ. A.KorbF. M.VillringerA.OttD. V. M. (2011).
Transcranial magnetic stimulation intensities in cognitive paradigms. PLoS One,
6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024836
29.
KrekelbergB.van WezelR. J. A.AlbrightT. D. (2006).
Interactions between speed and contrast tuning in the middle temporal area: Implications for the neural code for speed. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience,
26, 8988–8998. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1983-06.2006
30.
MakinA. D. J.LawsonR.BertaminiM.PickeringJ. (2014).
Auditory clicks distort perceived velocity but only when the system has to rely on extraretinal signals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
67, 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.816751
31.
MakinA. D. J.PoliakoffE.DillonJ.PerrinA.MulletT.JonesL. A. (2012).
The interaction between duration, velocity and repetitive auditory stimulation. Acta Psychologica,
139, 524–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2012.01.013
MatsuyoshiD.HiroseN.MimaT.FukuyamaH.OsakaN. (2007).
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human MT+ reduces apparent motion perception. Neuroscience Letters,
429, 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.002
34.
McKeefryD. J.BurtonM. P.VakrouC.BarrettB. T.MorlandA. B. (2008).
Induced deficits in speed perception by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human cortical areas V5/MT+ and V3A. Journal of Neuroscience,
28, 6848–6857. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1287-08.2008
35.
MostertP.KokP.de LangeF. P. (2016).
Dissociating sensory from decision processes in human perceptual decision making. Scientific Reports,
5, 18253. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18253
36.
NewsomeW. T.PareE. B. (1988).
A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience,
8, 2201–2211. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.08-06-02201.1988
37.
PelliD. G. (1997).
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision,
10, 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00366
38.
Reich, D. S., Mechler, F., Purpura, K. P., & Victor, J. D. (2000). Interspike intervals, receptive fields, and information encoding in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1964--1974. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-05-01964.2000
39.
RokemA.SilverM. A. (2009).
A model of encoding and decoding in V1 and MT accounts for motion perception anisotropies in the human visual system. Brain Research,
1299, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BRAINRES.2009.07.005
40.
RudolphK.PasternakT. (1999).
Transient and permanent deficits in motion perception after lesions of cortical areas MT and MST in the macaque monkey. Cerebral Cortex,
9, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/9.1.90
41.
SilvantoJ.LavieN.WalshV. (2005).
Double dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in visual awareness. Cerebral Cortex,
15, 1736–1741. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi050
42.
ThompsonB.Aaen-StockdaleC.KoskiL.HessR. F. (2009).
A double dissociation between striate and extrastriate visual cortex for pattern motion perception revealed using rTMS. Human Brain Mapping,
30, 3115–3126. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20736
43.
VicovaroM.NoventaS.BattagliniL. (2019).
Intuitive physics of gravitational motion as shown by perceptual judgment and prediction-motion tasks. Acta Psychologica,
194, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.02.001
ZekiS. (1991).
Cerebral akinetopsia (visual motion blindness). A review. Brain : A Journal of Neurology,
114, 811–824. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.2.811
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
