The Rückenfigur, a rear-view depiction of a person, is an artistic device which dates back several centuries but became particularly prominent in 19th century in Germany. The adoption of the rear-view presents an intriguing challenge, since the viewer must engage with a figure which sees without visible eyes. Considered here are some of the perceptual issues which arise from this unusual pictorial device.
AmstutzN. (2015).
Caspar David Friedrich and the aesthetics of community. Studies in Romanticism,
54, 447–475.
2.
ArnheimR. (1956). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye (p. 32).
Faber and Faber.
3.
BaileyC. J. (1990). Caspar David Friedrich: An introduction. In LeightonJ.BaileyC. J. (Eds.), Caspar David Friedrich: Winter landscape (p. 21).
National Gallery Publications.
4.
CarusC. G. (2002). Nine letters on landscape painting (D. Britt, Trans., p. 95). Getty Research Institute.
5.
ItierR. J.BattyM. (2009).
Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: The core of social cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,
33, 843–863.
6.
KoernerJ. L. (2009). Caspar David Friedrich and the subject of landscape (2nd ed., pp. 192–195).
Reaktion Books.
7.
MuthC.HesslingerV. M.CarbonC.-C. (2018).
Variants of semantic instability (SeIns) in the arts: A classification study based on experiential reports. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,
12, 11–23.
8.
SchottG. D. (2018).
Gombrich and ‘Pictures that follow with their eyes’. Journal of Art Historiography,
19, 1–11.
9.
SpadoniR. (1999).
The figure seen from the rear, vitagraph, and the development of shot/reverse shot. Film History,
11, 319–341.
10.
WadeN. J. (2013).
Deceiving the brain: Pictures and visual perception. Progress in Brain Research,
204, 115–134.
