A novel modification of the Hermann grid stimulus is demonstrated. It is shown that introduction of extremely tiny squares at the corners of the grid squares in the classical stimulus, keeping the position and orientation of the grid squares fixed, can reduce the strength and even completely wipe out the illusory dark spots. The novel perturbing stimulus was investigated further and a gray-level intensity threshold was measured for the tiny corner squares beyond which the illusory blobs disappear completely. It was also found that this threshold remains practically unchanged over a wide range of grid square size for an observer.
BakshiA.GhoshK. (2012).
Some insights into why the perception of Mach bands is strong for luminance ramps and weak or vanishing for luminance steps. Perception,
41, 1403–1408.
2.
BaumgartnerG. (1960).
Indirekte Grossenbestimmung der rezeptiven Felder der Retina beim Menschenmittels der Hermannschen Gittertauschung [Indirect determination of the receptive fields of the retina in humans by means of the Hermann mesh lattice]. Pflugers Archiv Fur Die Gesamte Physiologie,
272, 21–22.
3.
BetzT.ShapleyR.WichmannF. A.MaertensM. (2015).
Noise masking of White’s illusion exposes the weakness of current spatial filtering models of lightness perception. Journal of Vision,
15, 11–17.
4.
De LafuenteV.RuizO. (2004).
The orientation dependence of the Hermann grid illusion. Experimental Brain Research,
154, 255–260.
5.
GeierJ.BernáthL.HudákM.SéraL. (2008).
Straightness as the main factor of the Hermann grid illusion. Perception,
37, 651–665.
6.
GeierJ.SeraL.BernathL. (2005).
Distortion tolerance of the Hermann grid. Perception,
34(supplement), 103.
7.
GhoshK.SarkarS.BhaumikK. (2006).
A possible explanation of the low-level brightness–contrast illusions in the light of an extended classical receptive field model of retinal ganglion cells. Biological Cybernetics,
94, 89–96.
8.
HamburgerK.BaierF.SpillmannL. (2012).
The tilted Hermann grid illusion: ‘Illusory spots’ versus ‘phantom bands’. Perception,
41, 239–242.
9.
HeringE. (1920). Vom simultanen Grenzkontrast. In Grundzuge der Lehre vom Lichtsinne [Outlines of the theory of the light sense] (Chapter 32, L. M. Hurvich & D. Jamieson, Trans., Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1964). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
HermannL. (1870).
Eine Ersheinung des simultanen Contrastes [A reflection of the simultaneous contrast]. Pflugers Archiv Fur Die Gesamte Physiologie,
3, 13–15.
11.
LingelbachB.BlockB.HatzkyB.ReisingerE. (1985).
The Hermann grid illusion—Retinal or cortical?Perception,
14(supplement, Abstract), A7.
12.
MeeseT. S.HessR. F. (2004).
Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. Journal of Vision,
4, 843–859.
13.
SchillerP. H.CarveyC. E. (2005).
The Hermann grid illusion revisited. Perception,
34, 1375–1397.
14.
SpillmannL. (1994).
The Hermann grid illusion: A tool for studying human perspective field organization. Perception,
23, 691–708.
15.
SpillmannL.LevineJ. (1971).
Contrast enhancement in a Hermann grid with variable figure-ground Ratio. Experimental Brain Research,
13, 547–559.
16.
SummersR. J.MeeseT. S. (2009).
The influence of fixation points on contrast detection and discrimination of patches of grating: Masking and facilitation. Vision Research,
49, 1894–1900.
17.
YuY.YamauchiT.ChoeY. (2004). Explaining Low-Level Brightness-Contrast Illusions Using Disinhibition. First International Workshop on Biologically Inspired Approaches to Advanced Information Technology (BioADIT 2004),
Lausanne,
Switzerland, January 29–30, 2004.
