FreudE.MacdonaldS. N.ChenJ.QuinlanD. J.GoodaleM. A.CulhamJ. C. (2018).
Getting a grip on reality: Grasping movements directed to real objects and images rely on dissociable neural representations. Cortex,
98, 34–48.
2.
GombrichE. H. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation.
London, England:
Phaidon.
3.
GoodaleM. A.MilnerA. D. (1992).
Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience,
15, 20–25.
4.
GoodaleM. A.MilnerA. D.JakobsonL.CareyD. J. (1991).
A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature,
349, 154.
5.
HarariY. N. (2014). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind.
New York, NY:
Random House.
6.
HeideggerM. (1927). Sein und Zeit (
vol. 14).
Tübingen, Germany:
Max Niemeyer.
7.
KoenderinkJ.van DoornA. (2012).
Gauge fields in pictorial space. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences,
5, 1213–1233.
8.
NanayB. (2011).
Perceiving pictures. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences,
10, 461–480.
9.
O’ReganJ. K. (2012).
How to build a robot that is conscious and feels. Minds and Machines,
22, 117–136.
10.
O’ReganJ. K.NoëA. (2001).
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
24, 939–973.
11.
PearlJ.MackenzieD. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect.
New York, NY:
Basic Books.
12.
SlaterM. (2009).
Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
364, 3549–3557.
13.
SnowJ. C.PettypieceC. E.McAdamT. D.McLeanA. D.StromanP. W.GoodaleM. A.CulhamJ. C. (2011).
Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects. Scientific Reports,
1, 130.
14.
WollheimR. (1998).
On pictorial representation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,
56, 217–226.
