Haptic object perception is still poorly understood up to now. This study investigated the ability of human fingers to discriminate the volume of objects by passive touch. Experiments measured the discrimination threshold of volume using three tasks: passive tactile volume perception, passive tactile area perception, and active tactile volume perception. In each trial, we utilized two plastic cubes to successively stimulate the fingers, and participants were instructed to make comparisons between the stimulus objects’ volume and area. Results showed that there was no significant difference in the discrimination thresholds of tactile volume perception between passive touch and active touch, whereas significant differences in the discrimination thresholds between fingertips, such as the thumb versus the pinky finger. In passive touch, the discrimination thresholds of volume perception were larger than that with surface area perception. We found that the discrimination of the volume of objects is more difficult than the discrimination of the area of the objects.
AckerleyR.CarlssonI.WesterH.OlaussonH.WaslingH. B. (2014).
Touch perceptions across skin sites: Differences between sensitivity, direction discrimination and pleasantness. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
8, 54. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00054
2.
AckerleyR.HassanE.CurranA.WessbergJ.OlaussonH.McGloneF. (2012).
An fMRI study on cortical responses during active self-touch and passive touch from others. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
6, 51. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00051
3.
AckerleyR.SaarK.McGloneF.WaslingH. B. (2014).
Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: Differences between glabrous and hairy skin. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
8, 34. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00034
4.
ArthurH.DanielP. W.HowardV. (1976).
A discrepancy between two modes of haptic length perception. The Journal of Psychology,
92, 79–87. doi:10.1080/00223980.1976.9921338
5.
BesleJ.Sanchez-PanchueloR. M.BowtellR.FrancisS.SchluppeckD. (2013).
Single-subject fMRI mapping at 7 T of the representation of fingertips in S1: A comparison of event-related and phase-encoding designs. Journal of Neurophysiology,
109, 2293–2305. doi:10.1152/jn.00499.2012
6.
BesleJ.Sanchez-PanchueloR. M.BowtellR.FrancisS.SchluppeckD. (2014).
Event-related fMRI at 7T reveals overlapping cortical representations for adjacent fingertips in S1 of individual subjects. Human Brain Mapping,
35, 2027–2043. doi:10.1002/hbm.22310
7.
BjornsdotterM.GordonI.PelphreyK. A.OlaussonH.KaiserM. D. (2014).
Development of brain mechanisms for processing affective touch. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
8, 24. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00024
8.
BodegardA.LedbergA.GeyerS.NaitoE.ZillesK.RolandP. E. (2000).
Object shape differences reflected by somatosensory cortical activation in human. Journal of Neuroscience,
20, RC51.
9.
BolanowskiS. J.VerrilloR. T.McGloneF. (2004).
Passive, active and intra-active (self) touch. Behavioural Brain Research,
148, 41–45. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00157-8
10.
Chatel-GoldmanJ.CongedoM.JuttenC.SchwartzJ. L. (2014).
Touch increases autonomic coupling between romantic partners. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
8, 95. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00095
11.
CroninV. (1977).
Active and passive touch at four age levels. Developmental Psychology,
13, 253–256.
12.
CrutchS. J.WarrenJ. D.HardingL.WarringtonE. K. (2005).
Computation of tactile object properties requires the integrity of praxic skills. Neuropsychologia,
43, 1792–1800. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.02.002
13.
DelhayeB.HaywardV.LefevreP.ThonnardJ. L. (2012).
Texture-induced vibrations in the forearm during tactile exploration. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
6, 37. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00037
14.
Gandevia, S. C. (1996). Kinesthesia: Roles for afferent signals and motor commands. In L. B. Rowell & J. T. Shepherd (Eds.), Handbook of physiology: Section 12. Exercise: Regulation and integration of multiple systems (pp. 128–172). New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
GardnerE. P.MartinJ. H.JessellT. M. (2000). The bodily senses. In KandelE. R.SchwartzJ. H.JessellT. M. (Eds.), Principles of Neural Science (pp. 430–450).
New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill.
16.
GazzanigaM. S.IvryR. B.MangunG. R. (2013). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (4th ed.). New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
17.
GoldreichD.KanicsI. M. (2003).
Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. Journal of Neuroscience,
23, 3439–3445.
18.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1968).
Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology-London,
195, 215–243. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455
19.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1977).
Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey striate cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences,
198, 1–59.
20.
JamesT. W.KimS.FisherJ. S. (2007).
The neural basis of haptic object processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale,
61, 219–229. doi:10.1037/cjep2007023
21.
KahrimanovicM.TiestW. M. B.KappersA. M. L. (2010).
Haptic perception of volume and surface area of 3-D objects. Attention Perception & Psychophysics,
72, 517–527. doi:10.3758/App.72.2.517
22.
KahrimanovicM.TiestW. M. B.KappersA. M. L. (2011).
Discrimination thresholds for haptic perception of volume, surface area, and weight. Attention Perception & Psychophysics,
73, 2649–2656. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0202-y
23.
KlatzkyR. L.LedermanS. J.MetzgerV. A. (1985).
Identifying objects by touch: An expert system. Perception & Psychophysics,
37, 299–302. doi:10.3758/Bf03211351
24.
LacourJ. P.DuboisD.PisaniA.OrtonneJ. P. (1991).
Anatomical mapping of merkel cells in normal human adult epidermis. British Journal of Dermatology,
125, 535–542. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1991.tb14790.x
25.
LedermanS. J. (1991).
Skin and touch. Encyclopedia of Human Biology,
7, 51–63.
26.
LedermanS. J.KlatzkyR. L. (1987).
Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology,
19, 342–368. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90008-9
27.
LedermanS. J.KlatzkyR. L. (2009a).
Haptic perception: A tutorial. Attention Perception & Psychophysics,
71, 1439–1459. doi:10.3758/App.71.7.1439
28.
LedermanS. J.KlatzkyR. L. (2009b). Human haptics. In SquireL. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (
Vol. 5, pp. 11–18).
San Diego, CA:
Academic Press.
29.
LeggeG. E.MadisonC.VaughnB. N.CheongA. M. Y.MillerJ. C. (2008).
Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness. Perception & Psychophysics,
70, 1471–1488. doi:10.3758/Pp.70.8.1471
30.
MayA. C.StewartJ. L.TapertS. E.PaulusM. P. (2014).
The effect of age on neural processing of pleasant soft touch stimuli. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
8, 52. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00052
31.
NormanJ. F.BartholomewA. N. (2011).
Blindness enhances tactile acuity and haptic 3-D shape discrimination. Attention Perception & Psychophysics,
73, 2323–2331. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0160-4
32.
OldfieldR. C. (1971).
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia,
9, 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
OzcanA.TulumZ.PinarL.BaskurtF. (2004).
Comparison of pressure pain threshold, grip strength, dexterity and touch pressure of dominant and non-dominant hands within and between right- and left-handed subjects. Journal of Korean Medical Science,
19, 874–878.
35.
PandayV.TiestW. M. B.KappersA. M. L. (2011). The influence of edges as salient features in haptic shape perception of 3D objects. In IEEE world haptics conference (pp. 529–532). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
36.
PandayV.TiestW. M. B.KappersA. M. L. (2012).
Influence of local properties on the perception of global object orientation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics,
5, 58–65. doi:10.1109/ToH.2011.53
37.
PlaisierM. A.TiestW. M. B.KappersA. M. L. (2009).
Salient features in 3-D haptic shape perception. Attention Perception & Psychophysics,
71, 421–430. doi:10.3758/App.71.2.421
38.
RichardsonB. L.WuilleminD. B.MackintoshG. J. (1981).
Can Passive touch be better than active touch—A comparison of active and passive tactile maze-learning. British Journal of Psychology,
72, 353–362. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1981.tb02194.x
39.
SaviniN.BabiloniC.BrunettiM.CauloM.Del GrattaC.PerrucciM. G.… FerrettiA. (2010).
Passive tactile recognition of geometrical shape in humans: An fMRI study. Brain Research Bulletin,
83, 223–231. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.08.001
40.
SchwartzA. S.PereyA. J.AzulayA. (1975).
Further analysis of active and passive touch in pattern-discrimination. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,
6, 7–9.
41.
Simoes-FranklinC.WhitakerT. A.NewellF. N. (2011).
Active and passive touch differentially activate somatosensory cortex in texture perception. Human Brain Mapping,
32, 1067–1080. doi:10.1002/hbm.21091
42.
StillaR.SathianK. (2008).
Selective visuo-haptic processing of shape and texture. Human Brain Mapping,
29, 1123–1138. doi:10.1002/hbm.20456
43.
SymmonsM. A.RichardsonB. L.WuilleminD. B. (2004, January). Active versus passive touch: Superiority depends more on the task than the mode. In S. Ballesteros & M. Heller (Eds.), Touch, blindness, and neuroscience (pp. 179–185). Madrid, Spain: Universidad Nacional De Educacion a Distancia.
44.
SymmonsM. A.RichardsonB. L.WuilleminD. B.VanDoornG. H. (2005). Active versus passive touch in three dimensions. In World haptics conference: First joint eurohaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, proceedings (pp. 108–113).
45.
TaylorJ. L. (2009). Proprioception. In SquireL. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience. (Vol. 7, pp. 1143–1149). Oxford: Academic.
46.
ThukralN.BhatiaP. (2014).
Comparison of two point discrimination in dominant & nondominant (right vs. left) limbs in healthy adults. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing,
5, 1365–1368.
47.
WangL. Y.WangW. H.YanT. Y.SongJ. Y.YangW. P.WangB.… WuJ. L. (2017).
Beta-band functional connectivity influences audiovisual integration in older age: An EEG study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience,
9, 239. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00239
48.
WangS. (1981).
A comparison of two modes of haptic length perception. Acta Psychologica Sinica,
13, 86–92.
49.
WeinsteinS. (1968). Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality. In KenshaloD. (Ed.), In the skin senses (pp. 195–222). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
50.
WuJ. L.YanT. Y.ZhangZ.JinF. Z.GuoQ. Y. (2012).
Retinotopic mapping of the peripheral visual field to human visual cortex by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Human Brain Mapping,
33, 1727–1740. doi:10.1002/hbm.21324
51.
ZhangZ.LiC.ZhangJ.HuangQ.GoR.YanT.WuJ. (2017).
Discrimination threshold for haptic volume perception of fingers and phalanges. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
80, 576–585. doi:10.3758/s13414-017-1453-z
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
