BarghJ. A. (2008). Free will is un-natural. In J, J. CBaer. KaufmanR. F. Baumeister (Eds), Are we free? Psychology and free will.
Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press.
2.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (1999).
The unbearable automaticity of being.American Psychologist,
54, 462.
3.
ChabrisC.SimonsD. (2010). The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us. New York: Random House.
4.
ChaterN. (2018). The Mind is Flat: The Illusion of Mental Depth and the Improvised Mind.
London, England:
Penguin.
5.
Chater, N., Felin, T., Funder, D.C., Gigerenzer, G., Koenderink, J.J., Krueger, J.I., Noble, D., Nordli, S.A., Oaksford, M., Schwartz, B., Stanovich, K.E., Todd, P.M. (2018). Mind, rationality and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 793–826
6.
FelinT.KoenderinkJ.KruegerJ. I. (2017).
Rationality, perception, and the all-seeing eye.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review24, 1040–1059.
7.
ForgasJ. P.BaumeisterR. F. (2019). Homo Credulus: The Social Psychology of Gullibility.
New York, NY:
Psychology Press.
8.
HoffmanD. D.SinghM.PrakashC. (2015).
The interface theory of perception.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
22, 1480–1506.
9.
KahnemanD. (2003).
A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.American Psychologist,
58, 697.
10.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow.
New York, NY:
Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
KleinO.DoyenS.LeysC.Magalhães de Saldanha da GamaP. A.MillerS.QuestienneL.CleeremansA. (2012).
Low hopes, high expectations: Expectancy effects and the replicability of behavioral experiments.Perspectives on Psychological Science,
7, 572–584.
13.
KruegerJ. I.FunderD. C. (2004).
Social psychology: A field in search of a center. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
27, 361–367.
14.
KuhnG.AmlaniA. A.RensinkR. A. (2008).
Towards a science of magic.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
12, 349–354.
15.
KuhnG.CaffarattiH. A.TeszkaR.RensinkR. A. (2014).
A psychologically-based taxonomy of misdirection.Frontiers in Psychology,
5, 1392.
16.
LamontP.WisemanR. (2005). Magic in Theory: An Introduction to the Theoretical and Psychological Elements of Conjuring.
Hatfield, Hertfordshire:
University of Hertfordshire Press.
17.
MacknikS. L.KingM.RandiJ.RobbinsA.ThompsonJ.Martinez-CondeS. (2008).
Attention and awareness in stage magic: Turning tricks into research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience,
9, 871.
18.
O’ReganJ. K.RensinkR. A.ClarkJ. J. (1999).
Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’.Nature,
398, 34.
19.
OrneM. T. (1962).
On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.American Psychologist,
17, 776.
20.
RensinkR. A.KuhnG. (2015).
A framework for using magic to study the mind.Frontiers in Psychology,
5, 1508.
21.
RensinkR. A.O’ReganJ. K.ClarkJ. J. (1997).
To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,
8, 368–373.
22.
RogersB. (2014).
Delusions about illusions.Perception,
43, 840–845.
23.
SharpeS. H. (1988). Conjurer’s Psychological Secrets.
Calgary, Canada:
Hades Publications.
24.
ShapiroA. G.TodorovicD. (Eds). (2017). The Oxford Compendium of Visual Illusions.
Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press.
25.
SimonsD. J.ChabrisC. F. (1999).
Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.Perception,
28, 1059–1074.
26.
SimonsD. J.LevinD. T. (1997).
Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
1, 261–267.
27.
Von UexküllJ. (2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.