We examined the effect of visual attention on binocular fusion limits by using Posner’s spatial cueing paradigm that entails cued shifts of attentional focus. Results showed that attention decreases the fusion limit. Observers perceived diplopia of a binocular line within +/−26.5 arcmin disparity (+/− correspond to uncrossed and crossed, respectively) more frequently when it was oriented to the line than when cued attention was directed elsewhere. We discuss the results in terms of attention increasing spatial resolution and contrast sensitivity.
Anton-ErxlebenK.CarrascoM. (2013).
Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: Linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.Nature Reviews: Neuroscience,
14, 188–200. doi:10.1038/nrn3443
2.
BadcockD. R.SchorC. M. (1985).
Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,
2, 1211–1216. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.2.001211
3.
BishopP. O.PettigrewJ. D. (1986).
Neural mechanisms of binocular vision.Vision Research,
26, 1587–1600. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(86)90177-X
BlakemoreC. (1970).
The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man.The Journal of Physiology,
211, 599–622. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009296
6.
BrainardD. H. (1997).
The psychophysics toolbox.Spatial Vision,
10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897x00357
7.
CarrascoM. (2006).
Covert attention increases contrast sensitivity: Psychophysical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies. Progress in Brain Research,
154, 33–70. doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)54003-8
8.
CarrascoM. (2011).
Visual attention: The past 25 years.Vision Research,
51, 1484–1525. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
CarrascoM.YeshurunY. (2009).
Covert attention effects on spatial resolution. Progress in Brain Research,
176, 65–86. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17605-7
11.
CollewijnH.ErkelensC. J.SteinmanR. M. (1988).
Binocular co-ordination of human horizontal saccadic eye movements.The Journal of Physiology,
404, 157–182. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017284
12.
CrawfordT. J.MullerH. J. (1992).
Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements.Vision Research,
32, 293–304. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90140-E
13.
CutroneE. K.HeegerD. J.CarrascoM. (2014).
Attention enhances contrast appearance via increased input baseline of neural responses.Journal of Vision,
14, 1–14. doi:10.1167/14.14.16
14.
DieterK.TadinD. (2011).
Understanding attentional modulation of binocular rivalry: A framework based on biased competition.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
5, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00155
15.
FischerB. (1986).
The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided eye-movements in monkey and man.Psychological Research,
48, 251–257. doi:10.1007/Bf00309089
16.
FründI.HaenelN. V.WichmannF. A. (2011).
Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior.Journal of Vision,
11, 119. doi:10.1167/11.6.16
17.
GrossbergS.SrinivasanK.YazdanbakhshA. (2015).
Binocular fusion and invariant category learning due to predictive remapping during scanning of a depthful scene with eye movements.Frontiers in Psychology,
5, 1–41. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01457
18.
GroveP. M.FinlaysonN. J.OnoH. (2014).
The effect of stimulus size on stereoscopic fusion limits and response criteria.Perception,
43, 155–177. doi:10.1068/p7513
19.
HowardI. P.RogersB. J. (2012). Binocular fusion and rivalry. In HowardI. P.RogersB. J. (Eds.), Perceiving in depth: Volume 2 stereoscopic vision (pp. 51–106).
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
20.
LiH. H.CarrascoM.HeegerD. J. (2015).
Deconstructing interocular suppression: Attention and divisive normalization.PLoS Computational Biology,
11, 26. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004510
MeeseT. S.HessR. F. (2005).
Interocular suppression is gated by interocular feature matching.Vision Research,
45, 9–15. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.08.004
25.
MitchellD. E. (1966a).
A review of the concept of “Panum’s fusional areas”. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry,
43, 387–401.
26.
MitchellD. E. (1966b).
Retinal disparity and diplopia.Vision Research,
6, 441–451. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(66)90052-6
27.
MulckhuyseM.TheeuwesJ. (2010).
Unconscious cueing effects in saccadic eye movements—Facilitation and inhibition in temporal and nasal hemifield.Vision Research,
50, 606–613. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.01.005
28.
OgleK. N.PrangenA. D. (1953).
Observations on vertical divergences and hyperphorias.AMA Archives of Ophthalmology,
49, 313–334. doi:10.1001/archopht.1953.00920020322009
29.
OnoH.AngusR.GregorP. (1977).
Binocular single vision achieved by fusion and suppression.Perception and Psychophysics,
21, 513–521. doi:10.3758/BF03198731
30.
O’SheaR. P.BlakeR.WolfeJ. M. (1994).
Binocular rivalry and fusion under scotopic luminances.Perception,
23, 771–784. doi:10.1068/p230771
31.
PaffenC. L. E.AlaisD. (2011).
Attentional modulation of binocular rivalry.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
5, 1–10. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00105
32.
PaffenC. L. E.HoogeI. T. C.BenjaminsJ. S.HogendoornH. (2011).
A search asymmetry for interocular conflict.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
73, 1042–1053. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0100-3
33.
PalmerD. A. (1961).
Measurement of the horizontal extent of Panum’s area by a method of constant stimuli.Optica Acta,
8, 151–159. doi:10.1080/713826374
34.
PelliD. G. (1997).
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies.Spatial Vision,
10, 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
35.
PoggioG. F.PoggioT. (1984).
The analysis of stereopsis.Annual Review of Neuroscience,
7, 379–412. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.002115
36.
PointerJ. S.HessR. F. (1989).
The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range.Vision Research,
29, 1133–1151. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(89)90061-8
37.
PosnerM. I. (1980).
Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
32, 3–25. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231
38.
PosnerM. I. (2014).
Orienting of attention: Then and now.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
69, 1864–1875. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.937446
39.
RobertsM.CymermanR.SmithR. T.KiorpesL.CarrascoM. (2016).
Covert spatial attention is functionally intact in amblyopic human adults.Journal of Vision,
16, 30. doi:10.1167/16.15.30
40.
RobinsonD. A. (1964).
The mechanics of human saccadic eye movement.The Journal of Physiology,
174, 245–264. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007485
41.
SchorC. M.TylerC. W. (1981).
Spatio-temporal properties of Panum’s fusional area. Vision Research,
21, 683–692. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(81)90076-6
42.
SchorC. M.WoodI. C.OgawaJ. (1984).
Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis.Vision Research,
24, 573–578. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(84)90111-1
43.
TylerC. W.KontsevichL. L. (1995).
Mechanisms of stereoscopic processing: Stereoattention and surface perception in depth reconstruction.Perception,
24, 127–153. doi:10.1068/p240127
44.
WangF.ChenM.YanY.ZhaopingL.LiW. (2015).
Modulation of neuronal responses by exogenous attention in macaque primary visual cortex.The Journal of Neuroscience,
35, 13419–13429. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0527-15.2015
45.
WolfeJ. M.FranzelS. L. (1988).
Binocularity and visual search.Perception and Psychophysics,
44, 81–93. doi:10.3758/bf03207480
46.
WooG. C. (1974).
The effect of exposure time on the foveal size of Panum’s area.Vision Research,
14, 473–480. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(74)90035-2
47.
YeshurunY.CarrascoM. (1998).
Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution.Nature,
396, 72–75. doi:10.1038/23936
48.
ZeinerK. M.SpitschanM.HarrisJ. M. (2014).
Perceptual integration across natural monocular regions. Journal of Vision,
14, 1–14. doi:10.1167/14.3.5
49.
ZhaopingL. (2008).
Attention capture by eye of origin singletons even without awareness—A hallmark of a bottom-up saliency map in the primary visual cortex.Journal of Vision,
8, 1.1–1.18. doi:10.1167/8.5.1
