BraddickO. (2018).
Illusion research: An infantile disorder?Perception, 47(8), 805–806. doi:10.1177/0301006618774658
2.
DurginF. H.BairdJ. A.GreenburgM.RussellR.ShaughnessyK.WaymouthS. (2009).
Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,
16, 964–969. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.964
3.
FirestoneC.SchollB. J. (2014).
“Top-down” effects where none should be found: The El Greco fallacy in perception research. Psychological Science,
25, 38–46. doi:10.1177/0956797613485092
4.
FirestoneC.SchollB. J. (2016).
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for ‘top-down’ effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
e229, 1–77. doi:10.1017/S0140525X15000965
5.
FodorJ. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
6.
GregoryR. L. (1997).
Visual illusions classified. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
1, 190–194. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01060-7
7.
KanizsaG. (1985).
Seeing and thinking. Acta Psychologica,
59, 23–33. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(85)90040-X
8.
LeslieA. M. (1988). The necessity of illusion: Perception and thought in infancy. In WeiskrantzL. (Ed.), Thought without language (pp. 185–210).
Oxford, England:
Oxford Science Publications.
9.
PasquinelliE. (2012). The awareness of illusions. In CalabiC. (Ed.), Perceptual illusions: Philosophical and psychological essays (pp. 59–74).
Basingstoke, England:
Palgrave McMillan. doi:10.1057/9780230365292_4
10.
PinnaB.BrelstaffG. J. (2000).
A new visual illusion of relative motion. Vision Research,
40, 2091–2096. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00072-9
11.
PylyshynZ. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
12.
ShapiroA. (2018).
Visual illusions: Nothing to lose but your chains—A reply to Oliver Braddick. Perception, 47(9), 901–904. doi:10.1177/0301006618785964
13.
Todorovic, D. (2018). In Defence of Illusions: A Reply to Braddick. Perception 47(9), 905–908. doi: 10.1177/0301006618787613
14.
WespR.GasperJ. (2012).
Is size misperception of targets simply justification for poor performance?Perception,
41, 994–996. doi:10.1068/p7281
15.
WoodsA. J.PhilbeckJ. W.DanoffJ. V. (2009).
The various perceptions of distance: An alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
35, 1104–1117. doi:10.1037/a0013622