AddamsR. (1834). An account of a peculiar optical phenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body. London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 5, 373–374.
2.
AddamsR. (1835). Optische Täuschung nach Betrachtung eines in Bewegung begriffenen Körpers [Optical illusion after looking at a moving body]. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 34, 348.
3.
Addams, R. (1836). On the interference of the aerial waves propagated by a tuning fork. West of England Journal of Science and Literature, 1835–1836, 60–61.
4.
BeattieW. (1838). Caledonia illustrated in a series of views taken expressly for the work of W. H. Bartlett, T. Allom, and others. London: Virtue.
5.
Bishop, G. D. (1961). Physics teaching in England from early times up to 1850. London: P.R.M. Publishers.
6.
BowditchH. P.HallG. S. (1881). Optical illusions of motion. Journal of Physiology, 3, 297–307.
7.
CooperM. L.HallV. M. D. (1982). William Robert Grove and the London Institution, 1841–1845. Annals of Science, 39, 229–254.
8.
FaradayM. (1831). On a peculiar class of optical deception. Journal of the Royal Institution of Great Britain, 1, 205–223.
9.
Mach, E. (1875). Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungsempfindungen [Fundamentals of the theory of movement perception]. Leipzig: Engelmann.
10.
Martin, T. (1933). (ed). Faraday's diary. Being the various philosophical notes of experimental investigation. Volume IV. London: Bell.
11.
Neve, M. R. (1984). Natural philosophy, medicine and the culture of science in provincial England: The cases of Bristol, 1790–1850. Doctoral dissertation, University College London. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1317986/2/312208.pdf
12.
Plateau, J. (1833). Des illusions sur lesquelles se fonde le petit appareil appelé récemment Phénakisticope [Illusions based upon the small device recently called Phenakisticope]. Annales de Chimie et de Physique de Paris, 53, 304–308.
13.
PlateauJ. (1849). Quatrième note sur de nouvelles applications curieurses de la persistence des impressions de la rétine [Fourth note on new curious applications of the persistence of retinal impressions]. Bulletins de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Bruxelles, 16, 254–260.
Stampfer, S. (1833). Die stroboskopischen Scheiben oder optische Zauberscheiben, deren Theorie und Wissenschaftliche Anwendung [The stroboscopic disks or optical magic disks, their theory and scientific application]. Vienna: Trentsensky & Vieweg.
16.
SteerF. W. (1962). The Chichester Literary and Philosophical Society and Mechanics' Institute, 1831–1924. Chichester: Chichester City Council.
17.
ThompsonS. P. (1880). Optical illusions of motion. Brain, 3, 289–298.
18.
WadeN. J. (2017). Early history of illusions. In ShapiroA.TodorovicD. (eds) Oxford compendium of visual illusions (pp. 3–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
WadeN. J.SpillmannL.SwanstonM. T. (1996). Visual motion aftereffects: Critical adaptation and test conditions. Vision Research, 36, 2167–2175.
20.
WadeN. J.VerstratenF. A. J. (1998). Introduction and historical overview. In MatherG.VerstratenF.AnstisS. (eds) The motion after-effect: A modern perspective (pp. 1–23). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
WohlgemuthA. (1911). On the after-effect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology, Monograph Supplement, 1, 1–117.
22.
Wundt, W. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie [Fundamentals of physiological psychology]. Leipzig: Engelmann.