The experience of seeing one's own face in a mirror is a common experience in daily life. Visual feedback from a mirror is linked to a sense of identity. We developed a procedure that allowed individuals to watch their own face, as in a normal mirror, or with specific distortions (lag) for active movement or passive touch. By distorting visual feedback while the face is being observed on a screen, we document an illusion of reduced embodiment. Participants made mouth movements, while their forehead was touched with a pen. Visual feedback was either synchronous (simultaneous) with reality, as in a mirror, or asynchronous (delayed). Asynchronous feedback was exclusive to touch or movement in different conditions and incorporated both in a third condition. Following stimulation, participants rated their perception of the face in the mirror, and perception of their own face, on questions that tapped into agency and ownership. Results showed that perceptions of both agency and ownership were affected by asynchrony. Effects related to agency, in particular, were moderated by individual differences in depersonalisation and auditory hallucination-proneness, variables with theoretical links to embodiment. The illusion presents a new way of investigating the extent to which body representations are malleable.
AndersonJ. R. (1984) The development of self-recognition: A review. Developmental Psychobiology17: 35–49. doi: 10.1002/dev.420170104.
2.
AppsM. A. J.TsakirisM. (2014) The free-energy self: A predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews41: 85–97. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.029.
3.
AsaiT.MaoZ.SugimoriE.TannoY. (2011) Rubber hand illusion, empathy, and schizotypal experiences in terms of self-other representations. Consciousness and Cognition20: 1744–1750. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.005.
4.
BentallR. P.SladeP. D. (1985) Reliability of a scale measuring disposition towards hallucination: A brief report. Personality and Individual Differences6: 527–529. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90151-5.
5.
BertaminiM.BerselliN.BodeC.LawsonR.WongL. T. (2011) The rubber hand illusion in a mirror. Consciousness and Cognition20: 1108–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.006.
6.
BertaminiM.ParksT. E. (2005) On what people know about images on mirrors. Cognition98: 85–104. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.002.
7.
BertaminiM.O'SullivanN. (2014) The use of realistic and mechanical hands in the rubber hand illusion, and the relationship to hemispheric differences. Consciousness and Cognition27: 89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.010.
8.
BertaminiM.WynneL. A. (2009) The tendency to overestimate what is visible in a planar mirror amongst adults and children. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology22: 516–528. doi: 10.1080/09541440902934087.
9.
BianchiI.SavardiU.BertaminiM. (2008) Estimation and representation of head size (people overestimate their own head, evidence starting from the 15th century). British Journal of Psychology99: 513–531. doi: 10.1348/000712608X304469.
10.
BlakemoreS. J.FrithC. (2003) Self-awareness and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology13: 219–224. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00043-6.
CacioppoS.ZhouH.MonteleoneG.MajkaE.QuinnK.BallA.CacioppoJ. (2014) You are in sync with me: Neural correlates of interpersonal synchrony with a partner. Neuroscience277: 842–858. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience. 2014.07.051.
13.
ConnorsM. H.ColtheartM. (2011) On the behaviour of senile dementia patients vis-à-vis the mirror: Ajuriaguerra, Strejilevitch, and Tissot (1963). Neuropsychologia49: 1679–1692. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.041.
14.
CostantiniM.HaggardP. (2007) The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition16: 229–240. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.001.
15.
de BezenacC.SlumingV.O'SullivanN.CorcoranR. (2015) Ambiguity between self and other: Individual differences in action attribution. Consciousness and Cognition35: 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.010.
16.
de HaanS.FuchsT. (2010) The ghost in the machine: Disembodiment in schizophrenia – two case studies. Psychopathology43: 327–333. doi: 10.1159/000319402.
17.
FristonK.SchwartenbeckP.FitzGeraldT.MoutoussisM.BehrensT.DolanR. J. (2013) The anatomy of choice: Active inference and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience7: 598. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00598.
18.
FrithC. D. (2005) The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control. Consciousness and Cognition14: 752–770. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.002.
19.
FuchsT. (2010) The psychopathology of hyper-reflexivity. Journal of Speculative Philosophy24: 239–255. doi: 10.1353/jsp.2010.0010.
20.
GallagherS. (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences4: 14–21. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5.
21.
GallupG. G. J. (1970) Chimpanzees: Self-recognition. Science167: 86–87. doi: 10.1126/science.167.3914.86.
22.
HoggM. A.ShermanD. K.DierselhuisJ.MaitnerA. T.MoffittG. (2007) Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology43: 135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.008.
23.
IraniF.PlatekS. M.PanyavinI. S.CalkinsM. E.KohlerC.SiegelS. J.GurR. C. (2006) Self-face recognition and theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and first-degree relatives. Schizophrenia Research88: 151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.07.016.
24.
JeannerodM. (2009) The sense of agency and its disturbances in schizophrenia: A reappraisal. Experimental Brain Research192: 527–532. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1533-3.
25.
KammersM. P.de VignemontF.VerhagenL.DijkermanH. C. (2009) The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia47: 204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.028.
26.
KammersM. P.MulderJ.de VignemontF.DijkermanH. C. (2010) The weight of representing the body: Addressing the potentially indefinite number of body representations in healthy individuals. Experimental Brain Research204: 333–342. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2009-9.
27.
KilcommonsA. M.MorrisonA. P. (2005) Relationships between trauma and psychosis: An exploration of cognitive and dissociative factors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica112: 351–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00623.x.
28.
LakinsD.StelM. (2011) If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition29: 1–14. doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.1.
29.
LewisE.LloydD. M. (2010) Embodied experience: A first-person investigation of the rubber hand illusion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences9: 317–339. doi: 10.1007/s11097-010-9154-2.
MaK.HommelB. (2015b) The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion. Consciousness & Cognition36: 277–288. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.008.
32.
MaK.SellaroR.LippeltD. P.HommelB. (2016) Mood migration: How enfacing a smile makes you happier. Cognition151: 52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.018.
33.
MedfordN.SierraM.BakerD.DavidA. S. (2005) Understanding and treating depersonalisation disorder. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment11: 92–100. doi: 10.1192/apt.11.2.92.
34.
MiallR. C.WolpertD. M. (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks9: 1265–1279. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4.
35.
MoutoussisM.FearonP.El-DeredyW.DolanR. J.FristonK. J. (2014) Bayesian inferences about the self (and others): A review. Consciousness and Cognition25: 67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.009.
36.
NewportR.PearceR.PrestonC. (2010) Fake hands in action: Embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental Brain Research204: 385–395. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2104-y.
Perona-GarcelánS.Carrascoso-LópezF.García-MontesJ. M.Ductor-RecuerdaM. J.López JiménezA. M.Vallina-FernándezO.Gómez-GómezM. T. (2012) Dissociative experiences as mediators between childhood trauma and auditory hallucinations. Journal of Traumatic Stress25: 323–329. doi: 10.1002/jts.21693.
39.
Perona-GarcelánS.Cuevas-YustC.García-MontesJ. M.Pérez-AlvarezM.Ductor-RecuerdaM. J.Salas-AzconaR.Rodríguez-MartínB. (2008) Relationship between self-focused attention and dissociation in patients with and without auditory hallucinations. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease196: 190–197. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318165c7c1.
40.
Perona-GarcelánS.García-MontesJ. M.Ductor-RecuerdaM. J.Vallina-FernándezO.Cuevas-YustC.Pérez-ÁlvarezM.Gómez-GómezM. T. (2012) Relationship of metacognition, absorption, and depersonalization in patients with auditory hallucinations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology51: 100–118. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02015.x.
41.
PostmesL.SnoH. N.GoedhartS.van der StelJ.HeeringH. D.de HaanL. (2014) Schizophrenia as a self-disorder due to perceptual incoherence. Schizophrenia Research152: 41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.027.
42.
SassL. A.ParnasJ. (2003) Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophrenia Bulletin29: 427–44. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007017.
43.
SassL.PienkosE.NelsonB.MedfordN. (2013) Anomalous self-experience in depersonalization and schizophrenia: A comparative investigation. Consciousness and Cognition22: 430–441. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.009.
44.
SforzaA.BufalariI.HaggardP.AgliotiS. M. (2010) My face in yours: Visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity. Social Neuroscience5: 148–162. doi: 10.1080/17470910903205503.
45.
SierraM.BakerD.MedfordN.DavidA. S. (2005) Unpacking the depersonalization syndrome: An exploratory factor analysis on the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale. Psychological Medicine35: 1523–1532. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705005325.
46.
SierraM.BerriosG. E. (2000) The Cambridge Depersonalisation Scale: A new instrument for the measurement of depersonalisation. Psychiatry Research93: 153–164. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1781(00)00100-1.
47.
SimeonD.KozinD. S.SegalK.LerchB.DujourR.GiesbrechtT. (2008) De-constructing depersonalization: Further evidence for symptom clusters. Psychiatry Research157, 1–3: 303–306. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.07.007.
48.
SpenceS. A.BrooksD. J.HirschS. R.LiddleP. F.MeehanJ.GrasbyP. M. (1997) A PET study of voluntary movement in schizophrenic patients experiencing passivity phenomena (delusions of alien control). Brain120: 1997–2011. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.11.1997.
49.
StanghelliniG. (2009) Embodiment and schizophrenia. World Psychiatry8: 56–59. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00212.x.
50.
StanghelliniG.BalleriniM.PoliP. F.CuttingJ. (2012) Abnormal bodily experiences may be a marker of early schizophrenia. Current Pharmaceutical Design18: 392–398. doi: 10.2174/138161212799316181.
51.
SynofzikM.VosgerauG.NewenA. (2008) Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two–step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition17: 219–239. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010.
52.
Tajadura-JiménezA.GrehlS.TsakirisM. (2012) The other in me: Interpersonal multisensory stimulation changes the mental representation of the self. PLoS One7: e40682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040682.
53.
Tajadura-JiménezA.LongoM. R.ColemanR.TsakirisM. (2012) The person in the mirror: Using the enfacement illusion to investigate the experiential structure of self-identification. Consciousness and Cognition21: 1725–1738. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.10.004.
54.
TsakirisM. (2010) My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia48: 703–712. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034.
55.
TsakirisM.CarpenterL.JamesD.FotopoulouA. (2010) Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research204: 343–352. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2039-3.
56.
TsakirisM.HaggardP. (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance31: 80–91. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80.
57.
TsakirisM.PrabhuG.HaggardP. (2006) Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition15: 423–432. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.004.
58.
VareseF.BarkusE.BentallR. P. (2012) Dissociation mediates the relationship between childhood trauma and hallucination-proneness. Psychological Medicine42: 1025–1036. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001826.
59.
VillarejoA.MartinV. P.Moreno-RamosT.Camacho-SalasA.Porta-EtessamJ.Bermejo-ParejaF. (2011) Mirrored-self misidentification in a patient without dementia: Evidence for right hemisphere and bifrontal damage. Neurocase17: 276–284. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2010.498427.
60.
von HolstE. (1954) Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. British Journal of Animal Behaviour2: 89–94. doi: 10.1016/S0950-5601(54)80044-X.
61.
WegnerD. M. (2003) The mind's best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7: 65–69. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00002-0.
62.
WoodruffP. W. (2004) Auditory hallucinations: Insights and questions from neuroimaging. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry9, 1–2; 73–91. doi: 10.1080/13546800344000165.
63.
ZhengZ. Z.MacDonaldE. N.MunhallK. G.JohnsrudeI. S. (2011) Perceiving a stranger's voice as being one's own: A ‘rubber voice’ illusion. PLoS One6: e18655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018655.
64.
ZopfR.TruongS.FinkbeinerM.FriedmanJ.WilliamsM. A. (2011) Viewing and feeling touch modulates hand position for reaching. Neuropsychologia49: 1287–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.012.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
