The Independent Perceptual Calibration of Action-Neutral and -Referential Environmental Properties

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to explore how the calibration of perception of environmental properties taken with reference to an animal and their action capabilities (e.g., affordances) and those that are independent of action capabilities (e.g., metric properties) relate. In both experiments, participants provided reports of the maximum height they could reach above their head with a number of different stick(s) (reach-with-stick height) and the length of those stick(s), a property that is a constituent of reach-with-stick height. In Experiment 1 reach-with-stick height reports improved over trials whereas stick length reports remained constant. In Experiment 2, feedback about maximum reach-with-stick height improved perception of this affordance, but such improvements did not transfer to perception of stick length in a pretest/practice task/posttest design. The results suggest that the perceptual calibration with practice perceiving or feedback about actual dimensions of action-referential and action-neutral properties do not necessarily depend on one another.

Keywords

ecological psychology perception perception or action perceptual learning perceptual organization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abeele

Bock

(2003) Transfer of sensorimotor adaptation between different movement categories. Experimental Brain Research 148: 128–132. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1317-0.

Adolph

K. E.

(2000) Specificity of learning: Why infants fall over a veritable cliff. Psychological Science 11: 290–295.

Amazeen

E. L.

(1999) Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25: 102–119.

Amazeen

E. L.

Turvey

M. T.

(1996) Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22: 213–232.

Ashby

F. G.

Gott

R. E.

(1988) Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 33–53.

Ashby

F. G.

Lee

W. W.

(1991) Predicting similarity and categorization from identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120: 150–172.

Ashby

F. G.

Townsend

J. T.

(1986) Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review 93: 154–179.

Bingham, G. P., & Pagano, C. C. (1998). The necessity of a perceptionaction approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 145–168.

Bruggeman

Warren

W. H.

(2010) The direction of walking—but not throwing or kicking—is adapted by optic flow. Psychological Science 21: 1006–1013.

10.

Chemero

(2003) An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology 15: 181–195. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5.

11.

Chemero

(2000) What events are. Ecological Psychology 12: 37–42. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_3.

12.

Coats, R. O., Pan, J. S., & Bingham, G. P. (2014). Perturbation of perceptual units reveals dominance hierarchy in cross calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 328–341. doi:10.1037/a0033802.

13.

Cooper

M. M.

Carello

Turvey

M. T.

(1999) Further evidence of perceptual independence (specificity) in dynamic touch. Ecological Psychology 11: 269–281.

14.

Cooper

M. M.

Carello

Turvey

M. T.

(2000) Perceptual independence of whole length, partial length, and hand position in wielding a rod. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26: 74–85.

15.

Epstein

(1982) Percept-percept couplings. Perception 11: 75–83.

16.

Fitzpatrick

Carello

Turvey

M. T.

(1994) Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense.”. Neuroscience 60: 551–568.

17.

Harnad

(1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 42: 335–346.

18.

Gibson

E. J.

(1969) Principles of perceptual learning and development, East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

19.

Gibson

J. J.

(1979) The ecological approach to visual perception, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

20.

Gibson

J. J.

(1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

21.

Higuchi

Murai

Kijima

Seya

Wagman

J. B.

Imanaka

(2011) Athletic experience influences shoulder rotations when running through apertures. Human Movement Science 30: 534–549. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.08.003.

22.

Kretch

K. S.

Adolph

K. E.

(2013) Cliff or step? Posture-specific learning at the edge of a drop-Off. Child Development 84: 226–240. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01842.x.

23.

Lee

Carello

Turvey

M. T.

(2012) An archer's perceived form scales the “hitableness” of archery targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38: 1125–1131.

24.

Mandler

J. M.

(2014) Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.

25.

Mark

L. S.

(1987) Eyeheight scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13: 361–370.

26.

Pan, J. S., Coats, R. O., & Bingham, G. P. (2014). Calibration is action specific but perturbation of perceptual units is not. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 404–415. doi:0.1037/a0033795.

27.

Pick

H. L.

Jr. Rieser

J. J.

Wagner

Garing

A. E.

(1999) The recalibration of rotational locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25: 1179–1188.

28.

Proffitt

D. R.

Linkenauger

S. A.

(2013) Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression. In: Prinz

Beisert

Herwig

(eds) Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 171–197.

29.

Ramenzoni

V. C.

Davis

T. J.

Riley

M. A.

Shockley

(2010) Perceiving action boundaries: Learning effects in perceiving maximum jumping-reach affordances. Attention, Percpetion, & Psychophysics 72: 1110–1119. doi:10.3758/APP.72.4.1110.

30.

Rieser

J. J.

Pick

H. L.

Jr. Ashmead

D. H.

Garing

A. E.

(1995) Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21: 480–497.

31.

Rumelhart

D. E.

(1980) Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In: Spiro

R. J.

Bruce

B. C.

Brewer

W. F.

(eds) Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 35–58.

32.

Santana

M. V.

Hove

Riley

M. A.

Tollnew

(2003) Haptically perceiving whole and partial rod length at the small scale. Ecological Psychology 15: 297–315. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1504_5.

33.

Shockley

Carello

Turvey

M. T.

(2004) Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveableness. Perception & Psychophysics 66: 731–742. doi:10.3758/BF03194968.

34.

Stephen

D. G.

Hajnal

(2011) Transfer of calibration between hand and foot: Functional equivalence and fractal fluctuations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 73: 1302–1328. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0142-6.

35.

Stoffregen

T. A.

(2003) Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology 15: 115–134. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_2.

36.

Stoffregen

T. A.

(2000) Affordances and events. Ecological Psychology 12: 1–28. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_1.

37.

Stoffregen

T. A.

Bardy

B. G.

(2001) On specification and the senses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 195–213.

38.

Thomas, B. J. (2016). The independence of animal-neutral and -referential environmental properties (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Ohiolink (Access No. 1470741055).

39.

Thomas

B. J.

Riley

M. A.

(2014) Remembered affordances reflect the fundamentally action-relevant, context-specific nature of visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40: 2361–2371. doi:10.1037/xhp0000015.

40.

Turvey

M. T.

Burton

Pagano

C. C.

Solomon

H. Y.

Runeson

(1992) Role of the inertia tensor in perceiving object orientation by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18: 714–727.

41.

Wagman

J. B.

(2015) As easy to move as a feather: Perception of 'lightness' as 'ease to move.'. Journal of Motor Behavior 7: 340–342. doi:10.1080/00222895.2014.983451.

42.

Wagman

J. B.

(2012) Perception of maximum reaching height reflects impending changes in reaching ability and improvements transfer to unpracticed reaching tasks. Experimental Brain Research 219: 467–476. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3104-x.

43.

Wagman

J. B.

Abney

D. H.

(2013) Is calibration of the perception of length modality-independent? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75: 824–829. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0483-4.

44.

Wagman

J. B.

Abney

D. H.

(2012) Transfer of recalibration from audition to touch: Modality independence as a special case of anatomical independence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38: 589–602. doi:10.1037/a0025427.

45.

Wagman

J. B.

Higuchi

Taheny

C. A.

(2014) Improvements in perception of maximum reaching height transfer to increases or decreases in reaching ability. American Journal of Psychology 127: 269–279. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.3.0269.

46.

Wagman, J. B., & Morgan, L. L. (2010). Nested prospectivity in perception: perceived maximum reaching height reflects anticipated changes in reaching ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 905–909. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.6.905.

47.

Wagman, J. B., Thomas, B. J., McBride, D. M., & Day, B. M. (2013). Perception of maximum reaching height when the means of reaching are no longer in view. Ecological Psychology, 25, 63–80. doi:10.1080/10407413.2013.753810.

48.

Wagman

J. B.

Van Norman

E. R.

(2011) Transfer of calibration in dynamic touch: What do perceivers learn when they learn about length of a wielded object? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64: 889–901. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.526233.

49.

Weast

J. A.

Shockley

Riley

M. A.

(2011) The influence of athletic experience and kinematic information on skill-relevant affordance perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64: 689–706. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.523474.

50.

Withagen

Michaels

C. F.

(2007) Transfer of calibration between length and sweet-spot perception by dynamic touch. Ecological Psychology 19: 1–19.

51.

Withagen, R., & Michaels, C. F. (2005). The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1379–1390. doi:0.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1379.

52.

Withagen

Michaels

C. F.

(2004) Transfer of calibration in length perception by dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics 66: 1282–1292.

53.

Withagen

Michaels

C. F.

(2002) The calibration of walking transfers to crawling: Are action systems calibrated? Ecological Psychology 14: 223–234. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1404_2.

54.

Witt

J. K.

(2011) Action’s effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20: 201–206. doi:10.1177/0963721411408770.

55.

Witt

J. K.

Riley

M. A.

(2014) Discovering your inner Gibson: Reconciling action-specific and ecological approaches to perception–action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21: 1353–1370. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0623-4.

56.

Yasuda

Wagman

J. B.

Higuchi

(2014) Can perception of aperture passability be improved immediately after practice in actual passage? Dissociation between walking and wheelchair use. Experimental Brain Research 232: 753–764. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3785-9.