We investigated recognition of familiar and unfamiliar own- and other-race faces across natural variability in appearance. Participants sorted 20 photographs of each of two identities into piles such that each pile contained all photographs of a single identity. The other-race effect was limited to unfamiliar faces. When faces were unfamiliar, participants perceived more identities when sorting other-race faces; when faces were familiar, participants made two piles for both own- and other-race faces. Our work calls for rethinking the concept of the other-race effect.
BurtonA. M. (2013) Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology66: 1467–1485.
2.
BurtonA. M.SchweinbergerS. R.JenkinsR.KaufmannJ. M. (2015) Arguments against a configural processing account of familiar face recognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science10: 482–496.
3.
CarbonC. C. (2008) Famous faces as icons. The illusion of being an expert in the recognition of famous faces. Perception37: 801–806.
4.
JenkinsR.WhiteD.Van MontfortX.BurtonA. M. (2011) Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition121: 313–323.
5.
LaurenceS.ZhouX.MondlochC. J. (2016) The flip side of the other-race coin: They all look different to me. British Journal of Psychology107: 374–388.
6.
MeissnerC. A.BrighamJ. C. (2001) Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law7: 3–35.
7.
MondlochC. J.ElmsN.MaurerD.RhodesG.HaywardW. G.TanakaJ. W.ZhouG. (2010) Processes underlying the cross-race effect: An investigation of holistic, featural, and relational processing of own-race versus other-race faces. Perception39: 1065–1085.
8.
RhodesG.HaywardW. G.WinklerC. (2006) Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review13: 499–505.
9.
ValentineT. (1991) A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology43: 161–204.
