In a series of five experiments we sought to determine what causes the biological motion sex aftereffect—adaptation of a general representation of the stimulus sex, adaptation to the motion in the stimulus, or adaptation to the form in the stimulus. The experiments showed that (a) adaptation to gendered faces and gendered full body images did not create a biological motion sex aftereffect; (b) adaptation to moving partial biological motion displays containing the most important motion cues for sex discrimination (shoulders and hips or shoulders, hips, and feet) did not create a biological motion sex aftereffect; and (c) adaptation to a static frame or shapes derived from a static frame did create a biological motion sex aftereffect. These results suggest that form information is sufficient to create a biological motion sex aftereffect and suggests that biological motion sex aftereffects may be a result of lower level rather than higher level adaptation in the visual system.
AfrazA.CavanaghP. (2009) The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations. Journal of Vision9: 1–17. doi:10.1167/9.10.10.
2.
AlaertsK.NackaertsE.MeynsP.SwinnenS. P.WenderothN. (2011) Action and emotion recognition from point light displays: An investigation of gender differences. PLoS ONE6: e20989, . doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020989.
3.
AtkinsonA. P.DittrichW. H.GemmellA. J.YoungA. W. (2004) Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full light displays. Perception33: 717–746.
4.
AtkinsonA. P.TunstallM. L.DittrichW. H. (2007) Evidence for distinct contributions of form and motion information to the recognition of emotions from body gestures. Cognition104: 59–72.
5.
BarclayC. D.CuttingJ. E.KozlowskiL. T. (1978) Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics23: 145–152.
6.
BarracloughN.JellemaT. (2011) Visual aftereffects for walking actions reveal underlying neural mechanisms for action recognition. Psychological Science22: 87–94. doi:10.1177/0956797610391910.
7.
BeintemaJ. A.GeorgK.LappeM. (2006) Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics68: 613–624.
8.
BeintemaJ. A.LappeM. (2002) Perception of biological motion without local image motion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America99: 5661–5663.
9.
BlakeR.ShiffrarM. (2007) Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology58: 47–74.
10.
BrainardD. H. (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision10: 433–436.
11.
BruceC.DesimoneR.GrossC. G. (1981) Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology46: 369–384.
12.
CasileA.GieseM. A. (2005) Critical features for the recognition of biological motion. Journal of Vision5: 348–360. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/5/4/6.
13.
ChangD. H. F.TrojeN. F. (2009a) Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. Journal of Vision9: 1–17. doi:10.1167/9.1.19.
14.
ChangD. H. F.TrojeN. F. (2009b) Characterizing global and local mechanisms in biological motion perception. Journal of Vision9: 1–10. doi:10.1167/9.5.8.
15.
DavisJ. W.GaoH. (2004) An expressive three-mode principal components model for gender recognition. Journal of Vision4: 362–377. doi:10.1167/4.5.2.
16.
DittrichW. H. (1993) Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception22: 15–22.
17.
FitzgeraldS.-A.BrooksA.van der ZwanR.BlairD. (2014) Seeing the world topsy-turvy: The primary role of kinematics in biological motion inversion effects. i-Perception5: 120–131. doi:10.1068/i0612.
18.
Franz, V. H., & Loftus, G. R. (2012). Standard errors and confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: Generalizing Loftus and Masson (1994) and avoiding the biases of alternative accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 395–404. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0230-1.
19.
GieseM. A.PoggioT. (2003) Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience4: 179–192.
20.
GrossmanE. D.JardineN. L.PylesJ. A. (2010) fMR-adaptation reveals invariant coding of biological motion on the human STS. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience4: 1–18. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.015.2010.
21.
HiraiM.ChangD. H. F.SaundersD. R.TrojeN. F. (2011) Body configuration modulates the usage of local cues to direction in biological motion perception. Psychological Science22: 1543–1549. doi:10.1177/0956797611417257.
22.
HirisE. (2007) Detection of biological and nonbiological motion. Journal of Vision7: 1–16. doi:10.1167/7.12.4.
23.
JacksonS.BlakeR. (2010) Neural integration of information specifying human structure from form, motion, and depth. The Journal of Neuroscience30: 838–848.
24.
JastorffJ.OrbanG. A. (2009) Human functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals separation and integration of shape and motion cues in biological motion processing. The Journal of Neuroscience29: 7315–7329.
25.
JastorffJ.PopivanovI. D.VogelsR.VanduffelW.OrbanG. A. (2012) Integration of shape and motion cues in biological motion processing in the monkey STS. NeuroImage60: 911–921. doi:10:1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.087.
26.
JohanssonG. (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics14: 201–211.
27.
JohnsonK. L.GillS.ReichmanV.TassinaryL. G. (2007) Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology93: 321–334. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.321.
28.
JohnsonK. L.TassinaryL. G. (2005) Perceiving sex directly and indirectly. Psychological Science16: 890–897.
29.
JordanH.FallahM.StonerG. R. (2006) Adaptation of gender derived from biological motion. Nature Neuroscience9: 738–739.
KohnA. (2007) Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. Journal of Neurophysiology97: 3155–3164. doi:10.1152/jn.00086.2007.
32.
KozlowskiL. T.CuttingJ. E. (1977) Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics21: 571–580.
33.
KuhlmannS.de LussanetM. H. E.LappeM. (2009) Perception of limited-lifetime biological motion from different viewpoints. Journal of Vision9: 1–14. doi:10.1167/9.10.11.
34.
LangeJ.GeorgK.LappeM. (2006) Visual perception of biological motion by form: A template-matching analysis. Journal of Vision6: 836–849. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/6/8/6/.
35.
LangeJ.LappeM. (2006) A model of biological motion perception from configural form cues. The Journal of Neuroscience26: 2894–2906.
36.
LangeJ.LappeM. (2007) The role of spatial and temporal information in biological motion perception. Advances in Cognitive Psychology3: 419–428.
37.
LoulaF.PrasadS.HarberK.ShiffrarM. (2005) Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance31: 210–220.
38.
MatherG.MurdochL. (1994) Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B258: 273–279.
39.
MatherG.VerstratenF.AnstisS. M. (1998) The motion aftereffect: A modern perspective, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
MirenziA.HirisE. (2011) The Thatcher effect in biological motion. Perception40: 1257–1260. doi:10.1068/p7077.
41.
NishidaS. (2011) Advancement of motion psychophysics: Review 2001-2010. Journal of Vision11: 1–53. doi:10.1167/11.5.11.
42.
PalumboR.LaengB.TommasiL. (2013) Gender-specific aftereffects following adaptation to silhouettes of human bodies. Visual Cognition21: 1–12. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.753970.
43.
PeelenM. V.GlaserB.VuilleumierP.EliezS. (2009) Differential development of selectivity for faces and bodies in the fusiform gyrus. Developmental Science12: F16–F25.
44.
PelliD. G. (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision10: 437–442.
45.
PintoJ.ShiffrarM. (1999) Subconfigurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays. Acta Psychologica102: 293–318.
46.
PollickF. E.KayJ. W.HeimK.StringerR. (2005) Gender recognition from point-light walkers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance31: 1247–1265. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1247.
47.
PollickF. E.PatersonH. M.BruderlinA.SanfordA. J. (2001) Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition82: B51–B61.
48.
ReidR.BrooksA.BlairD.van der ZwanR. (2009) Snap! Recognising implicit actions in static point-light displays. Perception38: 613–616. doi:10.1068/p6320.
49.
RoetherC. L.OmlorL.ChristensenA.GieseM. A. (2009) Critical features for the perception of emotion from gait. Journal of Vision9: 1–32. doi:10.1167/9.6.15.
50.
SaundersD. R.WilliamsonD. K.TrojeN. F. (2010) Gaze patterns during perception of direction and gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision10: 1–10. doi:10.1167/10.11.9.
51.
TaylorJ. C.WiggettA. J.DowningP. E. (2007) Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. Journal of Neurophysiology98: 1626–1633.
52.
TheusnerS.de LussanetM. H. E.LappeM. (2011) Adaptation to biological motion leads to a motion and a form aftereffect. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics73: 1843–1855. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0133-7.
53.
ThirkettleM.BentonC. P.Scott-SamuelN. E. (2009) Contributions of form, motion and task to biological motion perception. Journal of Vision9: 1–11. doi:10.1167/9.3.28.
54.
ThurmanS. M.GieseM. A.GrossmanE. D. (2010) Perceptual and computational analysis of critical features for biological motion. Journal of Vision10: 1–14. doi:10.1167/10.12.15.
55.
ThurmanS. M.GrossmanE. D. (2008) Temporal “bubbles” reveal key features for point-light biological motion perception. Journal of Vision8: 1–11. doi:10.1167/8.3.28.
56.
TrojeN. F. (2002) Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision2: 371–387. doi:10:1167/2.5.2.
57.
TrojeN. F.SadrJ.GeyerH.NakayamaK. (2006) Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision6: 850–857. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/6/8/7/.
58.
TrojeN. F.WesthoffC. (2006) The inversion effect in biological motion perception: Evidence for a “life detector”?Current Biology16: 821–824.
59.
TrojeN. F.WesthoffC.LavrovM. (2005) Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues. Perception & Psychophysics67: 667–675.
60.
van BoxtelJ. J. A.LuH. (2013) Impaired global, and compensatory local, biological motion processing in people with high levels of autistic traits. Frontiers in Psychology4: 1–10.
61.
WebsterM. A. (1996) Human colour perception and its adaptation. Computation in Neural Systems7: 587–634.
62.
WebsterM. A.KapingD.MizokamiY.DuhamelP. (2004) Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature428: 557–561.
63.
WesthoffC.TrojeN. F. (2007) Kinematic cues for person identification from biological motion. Perception & Psychophysics69: 241–253.
64.
XuH.DayanP.LipkinR. M.QianN. (2008) Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: Low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments. The Journal of Neuroscience28: 3374–3383. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0182-08.2008.
65.
YangX.HeS.JiangY. (2011) Adapting to male or female faces induce gender aftereffect in point-light walkers. Journal of Vision11: 691, . doi:10.1167/11.11.691.
