Processing the spatial frequency components of an image is a crucial feature for visual perception, especially in recognition of faces. Here, we study the correlation between spatial frequency components of images of faces and neuronal activity in monkey amygdala while performing a visual recognition task. The frequency components of the images were analyzed using a fast Fourier transform for 40 spatial frequency ranges. We recorded 65 neurons showing statistically significant responses to at least one of the images used as a stimulus. A total of 37 of these neurons (n = 37) showed significant responses to at least three images, and in eight of them (8/37, 22%), we found a statistically significant correlation between neuron response and the modulus amplitude of at least one frequency range present in the images. Our results indicate that high spatial frequency and low spatial frequency components of images influence the activity of amygdala neurons.
AggletonJ. P.BurtonM. J.PassinghamR. E. (1980) Cortical and subcortical afferents to the amygdala of the rhesus monkey. Brain Research190: 347–368.
2.
AmaralD. G.PriceJ. L.PitkänenA.CarmichaelS. T. (1992) Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. In J. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction, New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, pp. 1–66.
3.
AmaralD. G. (2002) The primate amygdala and the neurobiology of social behavior: Implications for understanding social anxiety. Biological Psychiatry51: 11–17.
4.
BaxterM. G.MurrayE. A. (2002) The amygdala and reward. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience3: 563–573.
5.
BermudezM. A.VicenteA. F.RomeroM. C.PerezR.GonzalezF. (2009) Spatial frequency components influence cell activity in the inferotemporal cortex. Visual Neuroscience26: 421–428.
6.
BermudezM. A.SchultzW. (2010) Responses of amygdala neurons to positive reward-predicting stimuli depend on background reward (contingency) rather than stimulus-reward pairing (contiguity). Journal of Neurophysiology103: 1158–1170.
7.
BermudezM. A.GobelC.SchultzW. (2012) Sensitivity to temporal reward structure in amygdala neurons. Current Biology22: 1839–1844.
8.
CampbellF. W.RobsonJ. G. (1968) Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. The Journal of Physiology197: 551–566.
9.
CostenN. P.ParkerD. M.CrawI. (1996) Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification. Perception & Psychophysics58: 602–612.
10.
DamasioA. R.DamasioH.Van HoesenG. W. (1982) Prosopagnosia: Anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology32: 331–341.
11.
De ValoisR. L.AlbrechtD. G.ThorellL. G. (1982) Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Research22: 545–559.
12.
DiCarloJ. J.MaunsellJ. H. (2003) Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position. Journal of Neurophysiolpgy89: 3264–3278.
13.
EverittB. J.MorrisK. A.O’BrienA.RobbinsT. W. (1991) The basolateral amygdala-ventral striatal system and conditioned place preference: Further evidence of limbic-striatal interactions underlying reward related processes. Neuroscience42: 1–18.
14.
GeorgesonM. A. (1980) Spatial frequency analysis in early visual processing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences290: 11–22.
15.
GonzalezF.KrauseF.PerezR.AlonsoJ. M.AcunaC. (1993) Binocular matching in monkey visual cortex: Single cell responses to correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random dot stereograms. Neuroscience52: 933–939.
16.
GothardK. M. (2014) The amygdalo-motor pathways and the control of facial expressions. Frontiers in Neuroscience8: 1–7.
17.
GrahamN. (1994) Non-linearities in texture segregation. Ciba Foundation Symposium184: 309–322.
18.
HayesT.MorroneM. C.BurrD. C. (1986) Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images. Perception15: 15595–15602.
19.
HolmesA.WinstonJ. S.EimerM. (2005) The role of spatial frequency information for ERP components sensitive to faces and emotional facial expression. Brain Research Cognition25: 508–520.
20.
InagakiM.FujitaI. (2011) Reference frames for spatial frequency in face representation differ in the temporal visual cortex and amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience31: 10371–10379.
21.
IrvinG. E.CasagrandeV. A.NortonT. T. (1993) Center/surround relationships of magnocellular, parvocellular, and koniocellular relay cells in primate lateral geniculate nucleus. Vision Neuroscience10: 363–373.
22.
JonesJ. P.PalmerL. A. (1987) An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology58: 1233–1258.
23.
JonesJ. P.StepnoskiA.PalmerL. A. (1987) The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology58: 1212–1232.
24.
KuraokaK.NakamuraK. (2007) Responses of single neurons in monkey amygdala to facial and vocal emotions. Journal of Neurophysiology97: 1379–1387.
25.
LeDouxJ. (2003) The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology23: 727–738.
26.
LeDouxJ. (1995) Emotion: Clues from the brain. The Annual Review of Psychology46: 209–235.
27.
LeonardC. M.RollsE. T.WilsonF. A.BaylisG. C. (1985) Neurons in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Behavioral Brain Research15: 159–176.
28.
LiuC. H.CollinC. A.RainvilleS. J.ChaudhuriA. (2000) The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition. The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26: 956–979.
29.
LivingstoneM.HubelD. (1988) Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science240: 740–749.
30.
LivingstoneM.HubelD. (1987) Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience7: 3416–3468.
31.
MalkovaL.GraffanD.MurrayE. A. (1997) Excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala fail to produce impairment in visual learning for auditory secondary reinforcement but interfere with reinforcer devaluation effects in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience17: 6011–6020.
32.
MaloneB. J.KumarV. R.RingachD. L. (2007) Dynamics of receptive field size in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology97: 407–414.
33.
McDonaldA. J. (1998) Cortical pathways to the mammalian amygdala. Progress of Neurobiology55: 257–332.
34.
MorawetzC.BaudewigJ.TreueS.DechentP. (2011) Effects of spatial frequency and location of fearful faces on human amygdala activity. Brain Research1371: 87–99.
35.
MorecraftR. J.McNealD. W.Stilwell-MorecraftK. S.GedneyM.SchroederC. M.HoesenG. W. (2007) Amygdala interconnections with the cingulate motor cortex in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology500: 134–165.
36.
MorrisJ. S.OhmanA.DolanR. J. (1999) A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating ‘unseen’ fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America96: 1680–1685.
37.
Montes-LouridoP.VicenteA. F.BermudezM. A.GonzalezF. (2015) Neural activity in monkey amygdala during performance of a multisensory operant task. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience6: 1–15.
38.
NakamuraK.MikamiA.KubotaK. (1992) Activity of single neurons in the monkey amygdala during performance of a visual discrimination task. Journal of Neurophysiology67: 1447–1463.
39.
NasanenR. (1999) Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images. Vision Research39: 3824–3833.
40.
NishijoH.OnoT.NishinoH. (1988) Single neuron responses in amygdala of alert monkey during complex sensory stimulation with affective significance. The Journal of Neuroscience8: 3570–3583.
41.
OlzakL. A.ThomasJ. P. (2003) Dual nonlinearities regulate contrast sensitivity in pattern discrimination tasks. Vision Research43: 1433–1442.
42.
OttavianiC.CevolaniD.NuciforaV.BorlimiR.AgatiR.LeonardiM.BrighettiG. (2012) Amygdala responses to masked and low spatial frequency fearful faces: A preliminary fMRI study in panic disorder. Psychiatry Research203: 159–165.
43.
PasupathyA. (2006) Neural basis of shape representation in the primate brain. Progress in Brain Research154: 293–313.
44.
PeckE. L.PeckC. J.SalzmanC. D. (2014) Task-dependent spatial selectivity in the primate amygdala. The Journal of Neuroscience34: 16220–16233.
45.
PerezR.CastroA. F.JustoM. S.BermudezM. A.GonzalezF. (2005) Retinal correspondence of monocular receptive fields in disparity-sensitive complex cells from area V1 in the awake monkey. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science46: 1533–1539.
46.
PessoaL.AdolphsR. (2010) Emotion processing and the amygdala: From a ‘low road’ to ‘many roads’ of evaluating biological significance. Nature reviews. Neuroscience11: 773–783.
47.
PollenD. A.NaglerM.DaugmanJ.KronauerR.CavanaghP. (1984) Use of Gabor elementary functions to probe receptive field substructure of posterior inferotemporal neurons in the owl monkey. Vision Research24: 233–241.
48.
PrattW. E.MizumoriS. J. (1998) Characteristics of basolateral amygdala neuronal firing on a spatial memory task involving differential reward. Behavioral neuroscience112: 554–570.
49.
RodieckR. W. (1965) Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Research5: 583–601.
50.
RotshteinP.SchofieldA.FunesM. J.HumphreysG. W. (2010) Effects of spatial frequency bands on perceptual decision: It is not the stimuli but the comparison. Journal of Vision10: 1–20.
51.
SahP.FaberE. S.Lopez De ArmentiaM.PowerJ. (2003) The amygdaloid complex: Anatomy and physiology. Physiological Reviews83: 803–834.
52.
SaidC. P.BaronS. G.TodorovA. (2009) Nonlinear amygdala response to face trustworthiness: contributions of high and low spatial frequency information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience21: 519–528.
53.
SangheraM. K.RollsE. T.Roper-HallA. (1979) Visual responses of neurons in the dorsolateral amygdala of the alert monkey. Experimental Neurology63: 610–626.
54.
SchynsP. G.OlivaA. (1994) From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time-and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science5: 195–200.
55.
SripatiA. P.OlsonC. R. (2009) Representing the forest before the trees: A global advantage effect in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience29: 7788–7796.
56.
TanakaK. (1996) Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. The Annual Review of Neuroscience19: 109–139.
57.
VlamingsP. H.GoffauxV.KemnerC. (2009) Is the early modulation of brain activity by fearful facial expressions primarily mediated by coarse low spatial frequency information?Journal of Vision9: 12–13.
58.
VuilleumierP.ArmonyJ. L.DriverJ.DolanR. J. (2003) Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nature Neuroscience6: 624–631.
59.
VuilleumierP. (2005) Cognitive science: Staring gear in the face. Nature433: 22–23.
60.
WilsonF. A.RollsE. T. (1993) The effects of stimulus novelty and familiarity on neuronal activity in the amygdala of monkeys performing recognition memory tasks. Experimental Brain Research93: 367–382.
61.
WinstonJ. S.VuilleumierP.DolanR. J. (2003) Effects of low-spatial frequency components of fearful faces on fusiform cortex activity. Current Biology13: 1824–1829.
62.
ZhangW.SchneiderD. M.BelovaM. A.MorrisonS. E.PatonJ. J.SalzmanC. D. (2013) Functional circuits and anatomical distribution of response properties in the primate amygdala. The Journal of Neuroscience33: 722–733.
