AmmelingJAubrevilleMFritzA, et al. An interdisciplinary perspective on AI-supported decision making in medicine. Technol Soc. 2025;81:102791.
2.
AnchetaKLe CalvezSWilliamsJ.The digital revolution in veterinary pathology. J Comp Pathol. 2024;214:19–31. doi:10.1016/j.jcpa.2024.08.001.
3.
BertramCAAubrevilleMDonovanTA, et al. Computer-assisted mitotic count using a deep learning-based algorithm improves interobserver reproducibility and accuracy. Vet Pathol. 2022;59:211–226. doi:10.1177/03009858211067478.
4.
BertramCAKlopfleischR.The pathologist 2.0: an update on digital pathology in veterinary medicine. Vet Pathol. 2017;54:756–766. doi:10.1177/0300985817709888.
5.
BertramCAMarzahlCBartelA, et al. Cytologic scoring of equine exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage: performance of human experts and a deep learning-based algorithm. Vet Pathol. 2023;60:75–85. doi:10.1177/03009858221137582.
6.
CastelvecchiD.Can we open the black box of AI?Nature. 2016;538:20–23.
7.
Fragoso -GarciaMWilmFBertramCA, et al. Automated diagnosis of 7 canine skin tumors using machine learning on H&E-stained whole slide images. Vet Pathol. 2023;60:865–875. doi:10.1177/03009858231189205.
8.
HaghoferAParlakEBartelA, et al. Nuclear pleomorphism in canine cutaneous mast cell tumors: comparison of reproducibility and prognostic relevance between estimates, manual morphometry, and algorithmic morphometry. Vet Pathol. 2024;62:161–177. doi:10.1177/03009858241295399.
9.
HeilBJHoffmanMMMarkowetzF, et al. Reproducibility standards for machine learning in the life sciences. Nat Methods. 2021;18:1132–1135. doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01256-7.
10.
Hernandez- BoussardTBozkurtSIoannidisJPA, et al. MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27:2011–2015. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa088.
11.
HomeyerAGeißlerCSchwenLO, et al. Recommendations on compiling test datasets for evaluating artificial intelligence solutions in pathology. Mod Pathol. 2022;35:1759–1769. doi:10.1038/s41379-022-01147-y.
12.
Maier-HeinLReinkeAGodauP, et al. Metrics reloaded: recommendations for image analysis validation. Nat Methods. 2024;21:195–212. doi:10.1038/s41592-023-02151-z.
13.
MoassefiMSinghYConteGM, et al. Checklist for reproducibility of deep learning in medical imaging. J Imaging Inform Med. 2024;37:1664–1673. doi:10.1007/s10278-024-01065-2.
14.
MontezumaDOliveiraSPNetoPC, et al. Annotating for artificial intelligence applications in digital pathology: a practical guide for pathologists and researchers. Mod Pathol. 2023;36:100086. doi:10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100086.
15.
NorgeotBQuerGBeaulieu-JonesBK, et al. Minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modeling: the MI-CLAIM checklist. Nat Med. 2020;26:1320–1324. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1041-y.
16.
Piedra-MoraCRobinsonSRTostanoskiLH, et al. Reduced SARS-CoV-2 disease outcomes in Syrian hamsters receiving immune sera: quantitative image analysis in pathologic assessments. Vet Pathol. 2022;59:648–660. doi:10.1177/03009858221095794.
17.
PineauJVincent-LamarrePSinhaK, et al. Improving reproducibility in machine learning research (a report from the neurips 2019 reproducibility program). J Mach Learn Res. 2021;22:1–20.
18.
PugetCGanzJOstermaierJ, et al. Artificial intelligence can be trained to predict c-KIT-11 mutational status of canine mast cell tumors from hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological slides. Vet Pathol. 2024;62:152–160. doi:10.1177/03009858241286806.
19.
RosbachEAmmelingJKrügelS, et al. “When two wrongs don’t make a right”-examining confirmation bias and the role of time pressure during human-AI collaboration in computational pathology. In: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM; 2025. doi:10.1145/3706598.3713319.
20.
RosbachEGanzJAmmelingJ, et al. Automation bias in AI-assisted medical decision-making under time pressure in computational pathology. In: PalmCBreiningerKDesernoTM, et al. eds. Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing. Regensburg: Springer; 2025;129–134.
21.
SchulmanFYRoccabiancaPAvalloneG, et al. Reporting guidelines for manuscripts on tumor prognosis. Vet Pathol. 2022;59:397–398. doi:10.1177/03009858221082207.
22.
TejaniASKlontzasMEGattiAA, et al. Checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM): 2024 update. Radiol Artif Intell. 2024;6:e240300. doi:10.1148/ryai.240300.
23.
WahabNMiligyIMDoddK, et al. Semantic annotation for computational pathology: multidisciplinary experience and best practice recommendations. J Pathol Clin Res. 2022;8:116–128. doi:10.1002/cjp2.256.
24.
WulcanJMGiarettaPRFingerhoodS, et al. Artificial intelligence-based quantification of lymphocytes in feline small intestinal biopsies. Vet Pathol. 2024;62:139–151. doi:10.1177/03009858241286828.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
