Abstract
The authors report on the quality control for colposcopy adopted in the Florence District screening program. The sensitivity of colposcopy was determined on all cases of CIN III recorded in the local cancer registry in a four-year period. However although this showed that a centralized colposcopic clinic employing a limited number of expert operators is superior to the performance of colposcopy in private practice, such a parameter was impractical for further routine quality control since differences among operators were too small and statistically insignificant. Other parameters for quality control were chosen, namely a) the rate of colposcopically directed biopsies performed, b) the detection rate of CIN II or more severe lesions, and c) the positive predictive value of a directed biopsy for CIN II or more severe lesions. Analysis of these indicators after stratification by cytologic report allows the identification of those operators who need additional training and provides useful information for colposcopists to optimize their diagnostic and operative criteria.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.