Abstract
Between August 1979 and August 1984, 47 consecutive patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck entered one of three consecutive second-line treatments. Response rates with each treatment were very different (70 % vs 5.9 % vs 75 %), but there was no statistical difference in actuarial survival (survival: 30 % vs 29 % vs 20 %, respectively, at 260 days). In light of this observation, the efficacy of the second-line therapy appears doubtful and the survival of relapsing patients seems unrelated to the response achieved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
