Reasons for Failure of Physical Examination in Breast Cancer Detection (Analysis of 232 False-Negative Cases)

Abstract

The diagnostic role of physical examination (PE) is evaluated in 1450 cases of breast cancer detected in 34,677 women controlled at the Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica in the period 1974–1981. In 47 cancer cases, PE findings were normal since the neoplasm was not clinically palpable because of its size and site, and in another 185 cases the clinical diagnosis was benignancy without evidence of suspect signs. Therefore, the overall sensitivity of PE was 84%. PE errors did not involve a therapeutic delay for the patient in 75% of cases in which a biopsy was recommended for clinical benignancy or for suspicion on the basis of other diagnostic methods. The present study confirms that PE has a good diagnostic sensitivity when the examined population is represented by self-referred women, who for the most part are symptomatic, whereas it cannot be considered as the only diagnostic test for early diagnosis in mass screening, since in asymptomatic women a large number of cancers are not clinically palpable. Moreover, PE shows lower sensitivity for small lesions and in younger women. Extensive use of fine needle aspiration cytology and other diagnostic methods in association with PE is therefore recommended to reduce the possibility of errors.