The purpose of the study was to identify clinical, mammographic or sonographic abnormalities of the male breast that require histological characterization.
Methods and study design
Clinical and imaging features of 31 male patients with breast lesions were retrospectively evaluated and correlated with core needle biopsy results.
Results
Seven of 31 (22.6%) lesions proved to be malignant and 24 of 31 (77.4%) benign, with a benign/malignant ratio of 4.4:1. In the case of a suspicious clinical presentation (firm mass, nipple retraction) and/or the presence of risk factors for breast cancer (BRCA2 mutation, previous breast cancer), core needle biopsy always demonstrated malignancy. All malignant lesions identified on mammography (4 of 7) appeared as a mass. Benign lesions detected on mammography (21 of 24) presented as an area of increased density (20 of 21) more frequently than a mass (1 of 21).
Conclusions
Sonographic features of cancers were not different from those of benign lesions. Clinical and mammographic findings, along with patient history, can be useful in the identification of male breast lesions that require core needle biopsy.
ChenL., ChantraP.K., LarseL.H.: Imaging characteristics of malignant lesions of the male breast. Radiographics, 26: 992–1006, 2006.
2.
O’ HanlonD.M., KentP., KerinM.J., GivenH.F.: Unilateral breast masses in men over 40: a diagnostic dilemma. Am J Surg, 170: 24–26, 1995.
3.
StavrosA.T., ThickmanD., RappC.L., DennisM.A., ParkerS.H., SisneyG.A.: Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology, 196: 123–134, 1995.
4.
Ravanadi-KashaniF., HayesT.G.: Male breast cancer: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer, 34: 1341–1347, 1998.
5.
ChantraP.K., SoG.J., WollmanJ.S., BassettL.W.: Mammography of the male breast. Am J Roentgenol, 164: 853–858, 1995.
6.
GiordanoS.H., CohenD.S., BuzdarA.U., PerkinsG., HortobagyiG.N.: Breast carcinoma in men: a population-based study. Cancer, 101: 51–57, 2004.
7.
HodgsonN.C., ButtonJ.H., FranceschiD., MoffatF.L., LivingstoneA.S.: Male breast cancer: is the incidence increasing?Ann Surg Oncol, 11: 751–755, 2004.
8.
EvansG.F., AnthonyT., TurnageR.H., SchumpertT.D., LevyK.R., AmirkhanR.H., CampbellT.J., LopezJ., AppelbaumA.H.: The diagnostic accuracy of mammography in the evaluation of male breast disease. Am J Surg, 181: 96–100, 2001.
9.
PattersonS.K., HelvieM.A., AzizK., NeesA.V.: Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound. Breast J, 12: 418–423, 2006.
10.
YangW.T., WhitmanG.J., YuenE.H., TseG.M., StellingC.B.: Sonographic features of primary breast cancer in men. Am J Roentgenol, 176: 413–416, 2001.
11.
BelliciE., MalagaR., RemoA., BonettiF., Pozzi MucelliR.: Imaging of male breast. Radiol Med, 110: 574–588, 2005.
12.
GolshanM., RusbyJ., DominguezF., SmithB.L.: Breast conservation for male breast carcinoma. Breast, 16: 653–656, 2007.
13.
TemmimL., LuqmaniY.A., JarallahM., JumaI., MathewM.: Evaluation of prognostic factors in male breast cancer. Breast, 10: 166–175, 2001.
14.
CamilaC., Bergqvist, PerH., JonasB.: How to treat male breast cancer. Breast, 16: 147–154, 2007.
15.
AgrawalA., AyantudeA.A., RampulR., RobertsonJ.F.: Male breast cancer: a review of clinical management. Breast Cancer Res Treatment, 103: 11–21, 2007.
16.
AppelbaumA.H., EvansF.F.G., LevyK.R., AmirkanR.H., SchumpertT.D.: Mammographic appearances of male breast disease. Radiographics, 19: 559–568, 1999.
17.
GateleyC.A.Male breast disease. Breast, 7: 121–127, 1998.
18.
JanesS.E., LengyelG.A., SinghS., AluwihareN., IsgarB.: Needle core biopsy for the assessment of unilateral breast masses in men. Breast, 15: 273–275, 2005.
19.
BurgaA.M., FadareO., LiningerR.A., TavassoliF.A.: Invasive carcinomas of male breast: a morphologic study of the distribution of histologic subtypes and metastatic patterns in 778 cases. Virchows Arch, 449: 507–512, 2006.
20.
JacksonV.P., GilmorR.L.: Male breast carcinoma and gynecomastia: comparision of mammography and sonography. Radiology, 149: 533–536, 1983.
21.
HoussamiN., CiattoS., EllisI., AmbrogettiD.: Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy. Cancer, 109: 487–495, 2007.
22.
ZuianiC., LonderoV., BestagnoA., PuglisiF., Di LoretoC., BazzocchiM.: Proliferative high-risk lesions of the breast: contribution and limits of US-guided core biopsy. Radiol Med, 110: 589–602, 2005.
23.
LonderoV., ZuianiC., FurlanA., NoriJ., BazzocchiM.: Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Radiol Med, 112: 304–317, 2007.
JackmanR.J., YaremkoM.L., KluskensL.F., JokichP.M.: Stereotaxic large core-needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology, 193: 91–95, 1994.
26.
ParkerS.H., BurbankF., JackmanR.J., AucremanC.J., CardenosaG., CinkT.M., CosciaJ.L.Jr., EklundG.W., EvansW.P.3rd, GarverP.R.: Percutaneous large core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology, 193: 359–364, 1994.
27.
IshikawaT., HamaguchiY., TanabeM., MomiyamaN., ChishimaT., NakataniY., NozawaA., SasakiT., KitamuraH., ShimadaH.: False-positive and false-negative cases of fine-needle aspiration cytology for palpable breast lesions. Breast Cancer, 14: 388–392, 2007.
28.
WestenedP.J.: Core needle biopsy in male breast lesions. J Clin Pathol, 56: 863–865, 2003.
29.
BrittonP.D.Fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. Breast, 8: 1–4, 1999.
30.
DowlatshahiK., YaremkoM.L., KluskensL.F., JokichP.M.: Non-palpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology, 181: 745–750, 1991.
31.
GargS., MohanH., AmanjitB., AttriA.K., KochharS.: A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions. Diag Cytopathol, 35: 681–689, 2007.
