A law banning smoking in enclosed public places was implemented in Italy on January 10, 2005. The aim of this paper is to present a cross-sectional survey on two representative samples of non-smokers of two Italian towns (Florence and Belluno), conducted one year after the introduction of the ban, in order to assess prevalence of second-hand smoke exposure, to record the attitudes towards the ban, and the perception about its compliance in a representative sample of non-smokers.
Methods
Computer-assisted telephone interviews were carried out in March 2006, from a random sample of households from telephone registries. Respondents were 402 non-smokers from Belluno and 1,073 from Florence.
Results
About 12% of Florentines and 7% of Belluno respondents were exposed at home; 39% and 19%, respectively, at work; 10% and 5% in hospitality venues; 20% and 10% in cars. The smoke-free law was almost universally supported (about 98%) even if a smaller proportion of people (about 90%) had the perception that the ban was observed.
Conclusions
Second-hand smoke exposure at home and in hospitality premises has dropped to ≤10%, whereas exposure at work remained higher. These results suggest the need for more controls in workplaces other than hospitality venues.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking, vol 83, IARC Monographs, Lyon, 2002.
2.
California Environmental Protection Agency - National Cancer Institute: Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: the report of the California Environmental Protection Agency.Smoking and tobacco control monograph 10, Bethesda, MD, 1999.
3.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: The Health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2006.
AllwrightS., PaulG., GreinerB., MullallyB.J., PursellL., KellyA., BonnerB., D'EathM., McConnellB., McLaughlinJ.P., O'DonovanD., O'KaneE., PerryI.J.: Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study.BMJ, 331: 1117–1122, 2005.
7.
RepaceJ.: Respirable particles and carcinogens in the air of Delaware hospitality venues before and after a smoking ban.J Occup Environ Med, 46: 887–905, 2004.
8.
HelomaA., JaakkolaM.S.: Four-year follow-up of smoke exposure, attitudes and smoking behaviour following enactment of Finland's national smoke-free work-place law.Addiction, 98: 1111–1117, 2003.
9.
FongG.T., HylandA., BorlandR., HammondD., HastingsG., McNeillA., AndersonS., CummingsK.M., AllwrightS., MulcahyM., HowellF., ClancyL., ThompsonM.E., ConnollyG., DriezenP.: Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK survey.Tob Control,15(Suppl 3): 51–58, 2006.
10.
GoriniG., GasparriniA., FondelliM.C., CostantiniA.S., CentrichF., LopezM.J., NebotM., TamangE.: Environmental tobacco smoke (SHS) exposure in Florence hospitality venues before and after the smoking ban in Italy.J Occup Environ Med, 47: 1208–1210, 2005.
11.
SempleS., CreelyK.S., NajiA., MillerB.G., AyresJ.G.: Second-hand smoke levels in Scottish pubs: the effect of smoke-free legislation.Tob Control, 16: 127–132, 2007.
12.
FarrellyM.C., NonnemakerJ.M., ChouR., HylandA., PetersonK.K., BauerU.E.: Changes in hospitality workers’ exposure to second-hand smoke following the implementation of New York's smoke-free law.Tob Control, 14: 236–241, 2005.
13.
SkogstadM., KjaerheimK., FladsethG., GjølstadM., DaaeH.L., OlsenR., MolanderP., EllingsenD.G.: Cross shift changes in lung function among bar and restaurant workers before and after implementation of a smoking ban.Occup Environ Med, 63: 482–487, 2006.
14.
JousilahtiP., HelakorpiS.: Prevalence of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke at work and at home: 15-year trends in Finland.Scand J Work Environ Health, 28 Suppl, 2: 16–20, 2002.
15.
PickettM.S., SchoberS.E., BrodyD.J., CurtinL.R., GiovinoG.A.: Smoke-free laws and second-hand smoke exposure in US non-smoking adults, 1999–2002.Tob Control, 15: 302–307, 2006.
16.
GilpinE.A., WhiteM.M., WhiteV.M., DistefanJ.M., TrinidadD.R., JamesL., LeeL., MajorJ., KealeyS., PierceJ.P.: Tobacco control successes in California: a focus on young people, results from the California Tobacco Surveys, 1990–2002.La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, 2003.
17.
Italian Institute of Statistics (ISTAT): Multipurpose survey on health condition and access to health services, 2005.ISTAT, Rome, 2007.
18.
NebotM., LopezM.J., EBETSPV Group: Evidence-based policy development and enforcement for the prevention of exposure to passive smoking in European and accession countries (EBETSPV), 2004. Available at: http://www.ensp.org/files/ets_nebot.pdf (accessed November 2008).
19.
LevyP., LemeshowS.: Sampling of Populations, 3rd ed, Wiley, New York, 1999.
20.
Stata Corporation: Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0.Texas: College Station, 2003.
21.
Italian Institute of Statistics (ISTAT): Multipurpose survey on health condition and access to health services, 1999–2000.ISTAT, Rome, 2002.
22.
RossiS., MartucciL., MastrobattistaL., CarosiG., SpoletiniR., PacificiR.: Divieti di fumare nei locali pubblici e sul posto di lavoro. In: Proceedings of the 8th National Congress on Tobacco Consumption and National Health System. Rome, May 31, 2006. Available at: http://www.iss.it/ofad/fumo/cont.php?id=161&lang=1&tipo=3 (accessed November 2008).
23.
GallusS., ZuccaroP., ColomboP., ApoloneG., PacificiR., GarattiniS., La VecchiaC.: Effects of new smoking regulations in Italy.Ann Oncol, 17: 346–347, 2006.
GoriniG., MoshammerH., SbrogiòL., GasparriniA., NebotM., NeubergerM., TamangE., LopezM.J., GaleoneD., SerrahimaD.: Second-hand smoke exposure in Italian and Austrian hospitality premises before and after 2 years from the introduction of the Italian smoking ban.Indoor Air,18(4): 328–334, 2008.
26.
GasparriniA., GoriniG., MarcolinaD., AlbertiniM., FondelliM.C., TamangE., NebotM.: Second-hand smoke exposure in Florence and Belluno before and after the Italian smoke-free legislation.Epidemiol Prev, 30: 348–351, 2006.
27.
GoriniG., ChelliniE., GaleoneD.: What happened in Italy? A brief summary of the studies conducted in Italy to evaluate the impact of the smoking ban.Ann Oncol, 18: 1620–1622, 2007.
28.
GallusS., ZuccaroP., ColomboP., ApoloneG., PacificiR., GarattiniS., BosettiC., La VecchiaC.: Smoking in Italy 2005–2006: effects of a comprehensive National Tobacco Regulation.Prev Med, 45: 198–201, 2007.
29.
ReesV.W., ConnollyG.N.: Measuring air quality to protect children from second-hand smoke in cars.Am J Prev Med, 31: 363–368, 2006.
30.
BarnoyaJ., GlantzS.A.: Cardiovascular effects of second-hand smoke: nearly as large as smoking.Circulation, 111: 2684–2698, 2005.
31.
La VecchiaC., GarattiniS., ColomboP., ScarpinoV.: Attitudes towards smoking regulation in Italy.Lancet, 358: 245, 2001.
