We designed a comparative planning study aimed at quantifying the advantages of intensity-modu-lated radiotherapy (IMRT) over the conventional 3-field technique (3FT) and a 5-field conformal technique (5FCT) for head and neck (HN) cancer.
Methods
We selected 9 patients treated at our institution with curative radiotherapy for a HN cancer. For all cases 4 plans were generated: 2 plans using the “standard” techniques (3FT and 5FCT), a third plan using IMRT, and a fourth “mixed” plan using IMRT followed by a conventional boost.
Results
Our study confirmed literature data on the ability of IMRT to significantly decrease the dose received by organs at risk, compared with previous techniques. Target coverage was systematically better with 5FCT and IMRT than with 3FT. However, the increase in coverage of both PTV2 and PTV1 was only about 3-5% and this was achieved at the price of a similar increase in maximum dose (D1%). Volumetric parameters (V100%, V95%) were much more sensitive in detecting the improvement with IMRT.
Conclusions
The improvement of target coverage attained by IMRT, as compared with conventional and conformal techniques, might be overestimated by data currently available in the medical literature. If treatment with conventional techniques is planned using all tools provided by currently available fully 3-D planning systems, excellent target coverage can be obtained.
PuriD.R., ChouW., LeeN.: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers. Dosimetric advantages and update of clinical results.Am J Clin Oncol, 28: 415–423, 2005.
3.
MilesE.A., ClarkC.H., Guerrero UrbanoM.T., BidmeadM., DearnaleyD.P., HarringtonK.J., A'HernR., NuttingC.M.: The impact of introducing intensity modulated radiotherapy into routine clinical practice.Radiother Oncol, 77: 241–246, 2005.
4.
GabrieleP., MaciasV., StasiM., ChauvieS., MunozF., DelmastroE., ScielzoG.: Feasibility of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of advanced cervical chordoma.Tumori, 89: 298–304, 2003.
5.
LongobardiB., De MartinE., FiorinoC., Dell'OcaI., BroggiS., CattaneoS.M., CalandrinoR.: Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.Radiother Oncol, 77: 148–156, 2005.
6.
StasiM., GiordanengoS., CirioR., BorianoA., BourhalebF., CorneliusI., DonettiM., GarelliE., GomolaI., MarchettoF., PoezioM., Sanz FreireC.J., SardoA., PeroniC.: D-IMRT verification with a 2D pixel ionization chamber: dosimetric and clinical results in head and neck cancer.Phys Med Biol, 50: 4681–4694, 2005.
7.
SanguinetiG., CulpL.R., EndresE.J., BayouthJ.E.: Are neck nodal volumes drawn on CT slices covered by standard three-field technique?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 59: 725–742, 2004.
8.
GregoireV., MaingonP.: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an adaptation of 2-dimensional concepts or a reconsideration of current clinical practice?Sem Radiat Oncol, 14: 110–120, 2004.
9.
GardenA.S., MorrisonW.H., RosenthalD.I., ChaoK.S.C., AngK.K.: Target coverage for head and neck cancers treated with IMRT: review of clinical experiences.Sem Radiat Oncol, 14: 103–109, 2004.
KamMKMK, ChauR.M.C., SuenJ., ChoiP.H.K., TeoP.M.L.: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: dosimetric advantage over conventional plans and feasibility of dose escalation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 56: 145–157, 2003.
13.
ShonJ.W., SuhJ.H., PoharS.: A method for delivering accurate and uniform radiation dosage to the head and neck with asymmetric collimators and a single isocenter.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 32: 809–813, 1995.
14.
FogliataA., CozziL., BieriS., BernierJ.: Critical appraisal of a conformal head and neck cancer irradiation avoiding electron beams and field matching.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 45: 1331–1338, 1999.
15.
PalazziM., SoattiC., BianchiE., AlterioD., BaioA., BocciC., BonettaA., FeltreL., GuzzettiR., Jereczek-FossaB.A., MerlottiA.: Guidelines for the delineation of nodal regions of the head and neck on axial computed tomography images.Tumori, 88: 355–360, 2002.
16.
GregoireV., LevendagP., AngK.K., BernierJ., BraaksmaM., BudachV., ChaoC., CocheE., CooperJ.S., CosnardG., EisbruchA., El-SayedS., EmamiB., GrauC., HamoirM., LeeN., MaingonP., MullerK., ReychlerH.: CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC, RTOG consensus guidelines.Radiother Oncol, 69: 227–236, 2003.
17.
EisbruchA., Ten HakenR.K., KimH.M., MarshL.H., ShipJ.A.: Dose, volume and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 45: 577–587, 1999.
18.
ChaoK.S.C., DeasyJ.O., MarkmanJ., HaynieJ., PerezC.A., PurdyJ.A., LowD.A.: A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: initial results.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 49: 907–916, 2001.
19.
PacholkeH.D., AmdurR.J., MorrisC.G., LiJ.G., DempseyJ.F., HinermanR.W., MendenhallW.M.: Late xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conventional radiotherapy.Am J Clin Oncol, 28: 351–358, 2005.
20.
JabbariS., KimH.M., FengM., LinA., TsienC., ElshaikhM., TerrelJ.E., Murdoch-KinchC., EisbruchA.: Matched case-control study of quality of life and xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: initial report.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 63: 725–731, 2005.
21.
LeeN., XiaP., QuiveyJ., SultanemK., PoonI., AkazawaC., AkazawaP., WeinbergV., FuK.K.: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 53: 12–22, 2002.
22.
CozziL., FogliataA., LomaxA., BolsiA.: A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumours.Radiother Oncol, 61: 287–297, 2001.
23.
NuttingC.M., Con veryD.J., CosgroveV.P., RowbottomC., ViniL., HarmerC., DearnaleyD.P., WebbS.: Improvements in target coverage and reduced spinal cord irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with carcinoma of the thyroid gland.Radiother Oncol, 60: 173–180, 2001.
24.
DoganN., LeybovichL.B., KingS., SethiA., EmamiB.: Improvement of treatment plans developed with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for concave-shaped head and neck tumors.Radiology, 223: 57–64, 2002.
25.
CozziL., FogliataA., BolsiA., NicoliniG., BernierJ.: Three-dimensional conformal vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 58: 617–624, 2004.
26.
ClarkC.H., BidmeadA.M., MubataC.D., HarringtonK.J., NuttingC.M.: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves target coverage, spinal cord sparing and allows dose escalation in patients with locally advanced cancer of the larynx.Radiother Oncol, 70: 189–198, 2004.
27.
ZhouJ., FeiD., WuQ.: Potential of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate doses to head-and-neck cancers: what is the maximal dose?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 57: 673–682, 2003.
ChenS.W., YangS.N., LiangJ.A., ShiauA.C., LinF.J.: Comparative dosimetric study of two strategies of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer.Med Dosim, 30: 219–227, 2005.
