Report of the Joint Working Party of the Royal College of Pathologists, August 1991.
2.
KarranS.J., RanaboldoC.J., KarranA.: Review of the perceptions of general surgical staff within the Wessex region of the status of quality assurance and surgical audit.Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 75: 104–107, 1993.
3.
Good Medical Practice.General Medical Council, 1997.
4.
MeredithP., WoodC.: The development of the Royal College of Surgeons of England's patient satisfaction audit service.J Qual Clin Pract, 15: 67–74, 1995.
5.
StonebridgeP.A., ThompsonA.M., NixsonS.J.: Completion of the Journey of Care: Scottish audit of surgical mortality (SASM).J R Coll Surg Edinb, 4: 185–186, 1999.
6.
Fernandez-SegovianoP., LazaroA., EstebanA., RubioJ.M., IruretagoyenaJ.R.: Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit.Crit Care Med, 16: 683–685, 1988.
7.
MolloF., BertoldoE., GrandiG.: Reliability of death certification for different types of cancerian autopsy survey.Path Res Pract, 181: 442–447, 1986.
8.
ThomasA.C., KnapmanP.A., KriklerD.M., DaviesM.J.: Community study of the causes of “natural” sudden death.Br Med J, 297: 1453–1456, 1988.
9.
MosqueraD.A., GoldmanM.D.: Surgical audit without autopsy: tales of the unexpected.Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 75: 115–117, 1993.
10.
RusselT.M.R.: From my perspective.Bull Am Coll Surgeons, 85: 4–5, 2000.
11.
EllamushiH.E., KhanR., KitchenN.D.: Consent to surgery in a high-risk specialty: A prospective audit.Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 82: 213–216, 2000.
12.
BrandyJ.M., ChandonI., CarpenterR., RhodenA., Meeks-AitkenN.: The challenge of designing a database for auditing surgery in patients.West Indian Med J, 48: 195–197, 1999.