HorattasM.C., TrupianoJ., HopkinsS., PasiniD., MartinoC., MurtyA.: Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: Catheter selection and cost savings.Am J Infect Control, 29: 32–40, 2001.
2.
BallariniC., IntraM., Pisani CerettiA., CordovanaA., PaganiM., FarinaG., PerroneS., TomirottiM., ScanniA., SpinaG.P.: Complications of subcutaneous infusion port in the general oncology population.Oncology, 56: 97–102, 1999.
3.
BiffiR., CorradoF., de BraudF., de LuciaF., ScarpaD., TestoriA., OrsiF., BellomiM., MauriS., AaproM., AndreoniB.: Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.Eur J Cancer, 33: 1190–1194, 1997.
4.
BertoglioS., Di SommaC., MeszarosP., GipponiM., CafieroF., PercivaleP.: Long-term femoral vein central venous access in cancer patients.Eur J Surg Oncol, 22: 162–165, 1996.
5.
AldrighettiL., CateriniR., RonzoniM., JannelloA., FerlaG.: Role of totally implantable systems for long-term vascular access in the treatment of the neoplastic patient.Minerva Chir, 50: 447–454, 1995.
6.
BiffiR., de BraudF., OrsiF., PozziS., MauriS., GoldhirschA., NoleF., AndreoniB.: Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.Ann Oncol, 9: 767–773, 1998.
7.
FreytesC.O.: Indications and complications of intravenous devices for chemotherapy.Curr Opin Oncol, 12: 303–307, 2000.
8.
AlexanderH.R.: Vascular access and specialized techniques of drug delivery. In: Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, De VitaV.T.Jr., HellmanS., RosenbergS.A. (Eds), pp 725–734, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, 1997.
9.
BiffiR., MartinelliG., PozziS., CinieriS., CocorocchioE., PeccatoriF., FerrucciP.F., PistorioR., AndreoniB.: Totally implantable central venous access ports for high-dose chemotherapy administration and autologous stem cell trans plantation: analysis of overall and septic complications in 68 cases using a single type of device.Bone Marrow Transplant, 24: 89–93, 1999.
10.
deGramontA., BossetJ., MilanC., RougierP., BouchéO., EtienneP., MorvanF., LouvetC., GuillotE., BedenneL.: Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with bimonthly high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer: a French Intergroup study.J Clin Oncol, 15: 808–815, 1997.
11.
deGramontA., FigerA., SeymourM., HomerinM., HmissiA., CassidyJ., BoniC., Cortes-FunesH., CervantesA., FreyerG., PapamichaelD., Le BailN., LouvetC., HendlerD., deBraudF., WilsonC., MarvanF., BonettiA.: Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.J Clin Oncol, 18: 2938–2947, 2000.
12.
SaltzL.B., CoxJ.V., BlankeC., LeeS.R., FehrenbacherL., MooreM.J., MarounJ.A., AcklandS.P., LockerP.K., PirottaN., ElfringG.L., MillerL.L.for the Irinotecan Study Group: Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.N Engl J Med, 343: 905–914, 2000.
13.
LombardiD., MagriM.D., CrivellariD., SpazzapanS., PaolelloC., De CiccoM., Di LauroV., ScuderiC., VeronesiA.: Combination chemotherapy with navelbine and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in metastatic, chemotherapy refractory breast cancer.Ann Oncol, 11: 1041–1043, 2000.
14.
GarufiC., DogliottiL., D'AttinoR.M., TampelliniM., AschelterA.M., PuglieseP., PerroneM., NisticoC., ComosS., TerzoliE.: Irinotecan and chronomodulated infusion of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: a phase I study.Cancer, 91: 712–720, 2001.
15.
BowE.J., KilpatrickM.G., ClinchJ.J.: Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies. A randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life.J Clin Oncol, 17: 1267, 1999.