In a double-blind, crossover, randomized clinical pharmacological study performed on 10 healthy volunteers, peripheral and central effects of 10 mg cetirizine and 10 and 40 mg loratadine were compared. Cetirizine (10 mg) significantly (P < 0.001) inhibited 10 or 100 mg/ml histamine-induced weals 2 and 6 h after drug intake. Cetirizine was more potent than 10 mg loratadine after 2 and 6 h, and was even more potent than 40 mg loratadine after 6 h. Neither drug affected subjective evaluation of central effects and cetirizine was completely devoid of electro-encephalographic (EEG) changes, whereas 10 and 40 mg loratadine induced only slight and limited EEG changes.
HutherKJRenftleGBarraudNInhibitory activity of terfenadine on histamine-induced skin wheals in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol1977; 12: 195–199.
2.
RaffertyPHolgateSTTerfenadine is a potent and selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist in asthmatic airways. Am Rev Respir Dis1987; 135: 181–184.
3.
RoseCQuachTTLlorensCRelationship between occupation of cerebral H1-receptors and selective properties of antihistamines. Arzneimittelforschung1982; 32: 1171–1173.
4.
SnyderSHSnowmanAMReceptor effects of cetirizine. Ann Allergy1987; 59: 4–8.
5.
AhnHSBarnettASelective displacement of [3H]mepyramine from peripheral vs central nervous system receptors by loratadine, a non-sedating antihistamine. Eur J Pharmacol1986; 127: 153–155.
6.
LevanderSHagermarkOStahleMPeripheral antihistamine and central sedative effects of three H1-receptor antagonists. Eur J Clin Pharmacol1985; 28: 523–529.
7.
RihouxJ-PCompared peripheral H1 inhibiting effects of cetirizine and loratadine. Ann Allergy1990; 65: 139–142.
8.
RihouxJ-PDupontPComparative study of the peripheral and central effects of terfenadine and cetirizine 2HCl. Ann Allergy1987; 59: 235–238.
9.
CouliePDe VosCGhysLPharmacologic modulation by cetirizine 2HCl and loratadine of the histamine-induced skin reaction in mice and in humans. Drug Dev Res1989; 17: 199–206.
10.
DreborgSThe Skin Prick Test.Linköping University: Medical Dissertation, 1987; no. 239.
11.
Kontou-FiliKPaleologosGHerakleousMSuppression of histamine-induced skin relations by loratadine and cetirizine diHCl. Eur J Clin Pharmacol1989; 36: 617–619.
12.
RomanIJKassemNGuralRPSuppression of histamine-induced wheal response by loratadine (SCH 29851) over days in man. Ann Allergy1986; 57: 253–256.
13.
MaxwellCSensitivity and accuracy of the visual analogue scale: a psycho-physical classroom experiment. Br J Clin Pharmacol1978; 6: 15–24.
14.
PishkinVSengelRALovalloWRCognitive and psychomotor evaluation of Clemastinefumarate, diphenhydramine HCl and hydroxyzine HCl: double-blind study. Curr Ther Res1983; 33: 230–237.
15.
KulsresthaVKGuptaPPTurnerPSome clinical pharmacological studies with terfenadine, a new antihistamine drag. Br J Clin Pharmacol1978; 6: 25–29.
16.
GoldsteinLMurphyHBPfeifferCCComparative study of EEG effects of antihistamine in normal volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol1968; 8: 42–53.
17.
MatejcekMVigilance and the EEG: psychological, physiological and pharmacological aspects. In: EEG in Drug Research (HerrmannWM ed). Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer, 1982; pp 405–508.
18.
PechadreJCVernayDTroleseJFComparison of the central and peripheral effects of cetirizine and terfenadine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol1988; 35: 255–259.
19.
AlfordCBhattiJZRombautNEIA comparison of antihistamines using EEG and questionnaire-based assessments. Med Sci Res1989; 17: 421–423.
