Sixty patients took part in a randomized double-blind comparison of azatadine/pseudoephedrine versus placebo for the treatment of severe perennial allergic rhinitis. After 2 weeks of therapy subjective patient appraisal as well as objective physician evaluation showed the active drug combination to have a beneficial effect (72% good to excellent improvement versus 40% for placebo) in reducing the signs and symptoms of this allergic disorder. No adverse reactions were reported.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FierbergA A (1964a) Allergic nasal congestion. Annals of Allergy22, 324.
2.
FierbergA A (1964b) Oral treatment of allergic nasal congestion: Scientific exhibit presented at the AMA Clinical Meeting, Nov 29-Dec 2, 1964, Miami Beach, Fla.
3.
GoodmanL SGilmanA (1965) The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 3rd ed, Macmillan Co. p 31.
4.
KarlinJ M (1975) The use of antihistamines in allergic disease. Pediatric Clinics of North America22, 157.
5.
OkudaM (1975) Clinical effect of SCH 10649 (azatadine maleate) on nasal allergy. Jibi Rinsho68, (5), 669.
6.
OlivaR (1972) Therapeutic activity of the combination of dexbromphineramine maleate and D-isoephedrine sulfate in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and rhinosinusitis. Semana Medica140, (35), 1072.
7.
PerlmanD S (1976) Antihistamines: Pharmacology and clinical use. Drugs12, 258.
8.
ProctorD FAdamsG D (1976) Physiology and pharmacology of nasal function and mucus secretion. Pharmacology and Therapeutics2, 493.
SabbahA (1969) Clinical and pharmacologic study of a new antihistamine, azatadine maleate, in the treatment of allergic conditions. Vie Medicale12/3/69.
11.
SheldonJ M (1967) Drugs useful in allergic disease. In: Manual of Clinical Allergy. W B Saunders Co. p 130.
12.
ZeppE A (1975) Some pharmacologic aspects of the antihistamines. Clinical Pediatrics14, 119.