Abstract
The objectives of this study were two-fold: (1) a 4-week multicentre, randomized, double-blind efficacy comparison of placebo and guanabenz acetate, a new centrally acting antihypertensive drug, in 168 hypertensive out-patients and (2) a more accurate determination of the incidence of drug-related, non-specific side-effects. Both treatment groups were comparable: 68% female, 63% black, mean age 53 years; 57% mild, 32% moderate, 11% moderately severe hypertensives. Seventy-six placebo patients completed 4 weeks and had a mean supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) decrease from 105 to 101 mm Hg (p < 0.01). Seventy-nine guanabenz patients completing 4 weeks had a mean SDBP decrease from 104 to 92 mm Hg (p < 0.01). All of the placebo responses and 10/12 mm Hg of the guanabenz response occurred during Week 1. Clinically significant individual SDBP decreases occurred in thirty-one (41%) placebo and fifty-five (70%) guanabenz-treated patients (p < 0.01). Mean daily guanabenz dose was 24 mg. Drug-related biochemical or electrocardiographic abnormalities were absent. Side-effects of sedation and dry mouth were recorded two and three times more frequently, respectively, in guanabenz as compared to placebo patients. Side-effects usually occurred within Week 1 and diminished in incidence thereafter. Consequently, in these patients it appeared that: (1) guanabenz was an effective, well-tolerated drug, (2) placebo effects on efficacy were significant, occurred early and remained stable, and (3) placebo and guanabenz side effects were mainly sedation and dry mouth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.