Association between a DJ-1 polymorphism and the risk of Parkinson's disease: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective

In recent years, a number of case–control studies have focused on the association between the DJ-1 g.168_185del polymorphism and the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the results have been conflicting. To estimate the relationship between the DJ-1 g.168_185del polymorphism and PD susceptibility, a comprehensive meta-analysis was performed.

Methods

Eligible studies concerning the DJ-1 g.168_185del polymorphism and PD susceptibility were searched for in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to estimate the strength of the associations. In total, 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 13 case–control studies with 2890 cases and 3043 controls.

Results

This meta-analysis revealed that DJ-1 g.168_185del variants are associated with PD susceptibility in the non-Asian population, but not in the Asian population.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis suggests that DJ-1 gene variants are not associated with the risk of PD in the overall population.

Keywords

meta-analysis polymorphism Parkinson's disease g.168_185del disease susceptibility

Introduction

Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative movement disorders worldwide, affecting more than 1% of the population over 65 years of age.¹ It is characterized by variable combinations of bradykinesia, rigidity, resting tremors, and postural abnormalities.² In the human brain, PD is pathologically typified by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons and the presence of Lewy bodies.^3,4 The etiology of PD remains unclear. However, genetic factors such as PARK16,⁵ SNCA,⁶ or VPS13C variants,⁷ as well as certain environmental factors, have been shown to contribute to the increased risk of PD.

In humans, the DJ-1 (PARK7) gene is located on chromosome 1p36. It contains eight exons, spanning 24 kb, and encodes a protein consisting of 189 amino acids that belongs to the ThiJ/PfpI superfamily.^8,9 Oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage reportedly play important roles in the pathology of PD.¹⁰ Notably, DJ-1 is considered to play a key role in protecting neurons from oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage.^11,12 DJ-1 is also regarded as a chaperone, protease, and oncogene in glial cells and neurons of the substantia nigra and striatum.^13–17 With regard to the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism, numerous case–control studies have estimated the association between this polymorphism and PD susceptibility.^18–28 However, results have been conflicting. We therefore performed a comprehensive meta-analysis in the present study, to clarify the relationship between the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism and PD risk.

Materials and methods

The present meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.²⁹

Literature and search strategy

Two investigators (J Liu and WS Deng) identified all studies with a focus on the association between the DJ-1 g.168_185del polymorphism and PD risk using the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases, dating to March 15 2019. The keywords “(DJ-1) and (polymorphism) and (Parkinson's disease or PD or parkinsonism)” were used to search within the English electronic databases, and the Chinese electronic databases were searched using the corresponding Chinese characters. Only studies published in English or Chinese were included in this meta-analysis. The two investigators also reviewed the references of the relevant and included studies to identify any additional studies.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The published studies adhered to the following inclusion criteria: (1) focused on the association between the DJ-1 g.168_185del polymorphism and PD susceptibility; (2) case–control or cohort studies; (3) provided the genotype distributions of the cases and controls, so that odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) could be calculated; (3) published in English or Chinese; (4) the genotype distribution of the controls was consistent with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Reviews, abstracts, case reports, and duplicate reports were excluded.

Data extraction and quality assessment

For each eligible study, the following information was independently extracted by two investigators: first author, publication year, region or country, HWE in controls, sample size, and the numbers of case and controls. Any disagreements between the two investigators were resolved through discussion. In addition, the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to estimate the quality of eligible studies;³⁰ a score above 5 was considered to be of moderate-to-high quality.

Statistical analysis

The strength of the association between the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism and PD susceptibility was assessed using ORs and their 95% CIs under the five genetic models (allelic model: D vs. I, dominant model: DD+DI vs. II, homozygous model: DD vs. II, heterozygous model: DI vs. II, and recessive model: DD vs. DI+II). The degree of heterogeneity among the included studies was determined using the Q test and inconsistency index (I²) statistics (no heterogeneity: I² < 25%, moderate heterogeneity: I² = 25% to 50%, significant heterogeneity: I² > 50%).³¹ If I² > 50%, the random-effect model was used to calculate the OR and 95% CI; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was adopted.³² To assess the reliability of the present meta-analysis, a sensitivity analysis was performed according to the leave-one-out method.³³ Begg’s funnel plots and the Begg’s test were conducted to evaluate potential publication bias. Here, an asymmetrical funnel plot and a Begg’s test P-value of < 0.05 implied potential publication bias.³⁴ The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was estimated using the chi-squared test in the genotype distributions of the control groups.³⁵ In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed based on ethnicity (Asian and non-Asian) within the overall population. All statistical analyses in this study were performed using Stata software, version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Characteristics of selected studies

A total of 132 studies were identified from several electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases). A flow diagram describing the selection process is presented in Figure 1. After strictly screening the identified studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 studies containing 2890 cases and 3043 controls were finally included in this meta-analysis.^18–28 Of these studies, seven^22–28 were published in English and four^18–21 were published in Chinese. The characteristics of all eligible studies are listed in Table 1. All selected studies scored > 5 stars in the NOS test, indicating that the quality of the eligible studies was moderate or high (Table 2).

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of the literature selection process.

Table 1.

General characteristics of the 13 case–control studies.

First author	Year	Country	Ethnicity	Cases/controls (n)	Cases (n)			Controls (n)			HWE	NOS
First author	Year	Country	Ethnicity	Cases/controls (n)	II	DI	DD	II	DI	DD	HWE	NOS
Chen¹⁸	2008	China	Asian	192/197	190	2	0	196	1	0	0.972	6
Liu¹⁹	2008	China	Asian	213/195	188	25	0	166	28	1	0.877	6
Li²⁰	2012	China	Asian	364/346	318	45	1	308	38	0	0.28	8
Cai²¹	2013	China	Asian	90/105	80	10	0	91	14	0	0.464	7
De Marco²²	2010	Italy	Caucasian	294/298	215	77	2	259	37	2	0.594	6
Eerola²³	2003	Finnish	Caucasian	136/129	64	59	13	63	56	10	0.613	8
Sadhukhan²⁴	2012	India	Asian	282/225	218	62	2	184	39	2	0.967	6
Glanzmann²⁵ (a)	2014	African	Caucasian	285/264	284	1	0	264	0	0	NA	9
Glanzmann²⁵ (b)	2014	African	Mixed	99/132	97	2	0	129	3	0	0.895	9
Glanzmann²⁵ (c)	2014	African	Black African	18/132	16	2	0	129	3	0	0.895	9
Morris²⁶	2003	England	Caucasian	46/96	28	15	3	65	27	4	0.58	7
Huo²⁷	2017	China	Asian	348/325	285	60	3	268	52	5	0.189	6
He²⁸	2019	China	Asian	523/599	460	62	1	510	87	2	0.397	6

DD: del/del; DI: del/ins; II: ins/ins; HWE: Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; NA: not available; NOS: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of the association between the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease susceptibility.

Items	n	D vs. I	I² (%)	P	DD+DI vs. II	I² (%)	P	DD vs. II	I² (%)	P	DI vs. II	I² (%)	P	DD vs. DI+II	I² (%)	P
Items	n	OR (95% CI)	I² (%)	P	OR (95% CI)	I² (%)	P	OR (95% CI)	I² (%)	P	OR (95% CI)	I² (%)	P	OR (95% CI)	I² (%)	P
Total	13	1.09 (0.95, 1.26)	44.70	0.215	1.55 (0.99, 1.34)	48.90	0.069	1.04 (0.59, 1.82)	0.00	0.9	1.16 (0.99, 1.36)	48.30	0.06	1.01 (0.58, 1.76)	0.00	0.975
Ethnicity
Asian	6	0.91 (0.75, 1.11)	0.00	0.362	0.92 (0.75, 1.13)	0.00	0.425	0.65 (0.23, 1.82)	0.00	0.409	0.93 (0.76, 1.14)	0.00	0.502	0.65 (0.23, 1.82)	0.00	0.409
Non-Asian	7	1.35 (1.09–1.66)	47.60%	0.005	1.56 (1.23–1.97)	36.80%	0.02	1.28 (0.65–2.52)	0.00%	0.48	1.57 (1.23–2.00)	40.10%	<0.001	1.22 (0.63–2.36)	0.00%	0.562

CI: confidence interval; D: del; DD: del/del; DI: del/ins; I: ins; II: ins/ins; OR: odds ratio

Association of the DJ-1 gene polymorphism with PD susceptibility

All eligible studies (including 2890 cases and 3043 controls) were used to estimate the association between the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism and PD susceptibility. The pooled ORs and their 95% CI are summarized in Table 2. There were no significant associations in the overall population in any of the five models (Figure 2 and Table 2). The fixed-effect model was used in all genetic models (Table 2). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity (Asian and non-Asian), the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism was associated with a significantly increased risk of PD in the non-Asian population, but not in the Asian population (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Forest plot of the associations of DJ-1 gene g.168_185del variants with Parkinson’s disease susceptibility in overall populations under the dominant model. CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the influence of each study on the pooled ORs and 95% CIs by omitting each study in turn. There were no significant changes in the pooled ORs or 95% CIs in the dominant model (Figure 3), indicating the stability of the present meta-analysis. Begg’s funnel plot and Begg’s test were used to assess the publication bias of the included case–control studies. The shapes of the funnel plots were roughly symmetrical (Figure 4), and Begg’s test revealed no significant publication bias in this meta-analysis (DD+DI vs. II: P = 0.161).

Figure 3.

Sensitivity analysis of the summary odds ratio coefficients under the dominant model. CI: confidence interval.

Figure 4.

Begg's funnel plot of publication bias for the associations between the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease under the dominant model. OR: odds ratio.

Discussion

PD is a common neurodegenerative movement disorder in individuals over 65 years of age. In recent years, numerous case–control studies have focused on the relationship between the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism and PD susceptibility. However, the results of these studies have been inconsistent. To assess if any such association exists, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of 11 studies, including 13 case–control studies with 2890 cases and 3043 controls.

Variants in promoter regions are involved in gene transcription activity because of the DNA-binding ability of transcription factors. Siegel et al.³⁶ reported that the Ins allele of g.168_185del variants might affect the transcriptional activity of DJ-1 by binding to nuclear factors. The DJ-1 protein, which was initially identified almost a century ago, is expressed in many different tissue types.^14,37,38 DJ-1 is considered to play a key role in protecting neurons from oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage.^11,14 In addition, DJ-1 gene polymorphisms are closely associated with autosomal recessive early-onset PD.^9,39 Moreover, DJ-1 can eliminate hydrogen peroxide by undergoing self-oxidation. In doing so, reactive oxygen species are decreased.¹² DJ-1-related oxidative damage is reportedly evident within the brains of sporadic PD patients.^40,41 In addition, Waragai et al.⁴² reported that DJ-1 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of sporadic PD patients are significantly higher than in healthy controls. Furthermore, DJ-1 was found to promote the expression of anti-apoptotic genes and suppress apoptosis-associated pathways.^43–46 Overall, it seems that DJ-1 is associated with PD, although one study reported no significant difference between PD patients and controls in serum levels of DJ-1 protein.⁴⁷

In the present study, the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of PD under both the allelic and dominant models, based on data collected from 13 case–control studies (2890 cases and 3043 controls in the overall population). No significant heterogeneity was present in the five models that were used (Table 2). Additionally, in the subgroup analysis, we revealed that DJ-1 gene g.168_185del variants were not associated with PD susceptibility among the Asian population (Table 2). However, the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of PD among the non-Asian population (Table 2). Furthermore, no obvious publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis (DD+DI vs. II: P = 0.161). In summary, this comprehensive meta-analysis indicated that the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of PD in the non-Asian population, but not in the Asian population.

Several potential limitations exist in this meta-analysis. First, the included studies were published only in Chinese or English. Thus, potential publication bias may exist. Second, only four studies focused on the associations between the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism and PD risk among Caucasians, while one study²⁵ targeted mixed and black populations. Hence, a sub-group analysis was conducted based on ethnicity (Asian and non-Asian). Third, we were unable to test environmental factors and gene–gene or gene–environment interactions because insufficient information was collected.

Conclusion

This comprehensive meta-analysis of 13 case–control studies demonstrated that the DJ-1 gene g.168_185del polymorphism is associated with PD susceptibility among the non-Asian population, but not among the Asian population. However, considering the limitations of this study, the present results should be interpreted with caution. Further studies with larger sample sizes and diverse ethnic groups should be conducted to validate the resulting associations.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

ORCID iD

Wenshuai Deng

References

Kalia

Lang

AE.

Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2015; 386; 896–912.

Williams

Litvan

Parkinsonian syndromes. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2013; 19: 1189–1212.

Glizer

MacDonald

PA.

Cognitive training in Parkinson's disease: a review of studies from 2000 to 2014.

Parkinsons Dis 2016; 2016: 9291713.

Zhang

, et al. Protocatechuic acid inhibits neurotoxicity induced by MPTP in vivo. Neurosci Lett 2010; 474: 99–103.

Wang

, et al. Association between PARK16 and Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Lett 2017; 657: 179–188.

Fang

Hou

Liu

, et al. Association between SNCA rs2736990 polymorphism and Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Lett 2017; 658: 102–107.

Zou

Wang

, et al. Association analyses of variants of SIPA1L2, MIR4697, GCH1, VPS13C, and DDRGK1 with Parkinson's disease in East Asians. Neurobiol Aging 2018; 68: 159.e7–159.e14.

Huai

Sun

Wang

, et al. Crystal structure of DJ-1/RS and implication on familial Parkinson's disease. FEBS Lett 2003; 549: 171–175.

Bonifati

Rizzu

Van Baren

, et al. Mutations in the DJ-1 gene associated with autosomal recessive early-onset parkinsonism. Science 2003; 299: 256–259.

10.

Lin

Beal

MF.

Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases.

Nature 2006; 443: 787–795.

11.

Lev

Ickowicz

Melamed

, et al. Oxidative insults induce DJ-1 upregulation and redistribution: implications for neuroprotection. Neurotoxicology 2008; 29: 397–405.

12.

Taira

Saito

Niki

, et al. DJ-1 has a role in antioxidative stress to prevent cell death. EMBO Rep 2004; 5: 213–218.

13.

Olzmann

Bordelon

Muly

, et al. Selective enrichment of DJ-1 protein in primate striatal neuronal processes: implications for Parkinson's disease. J Comp Neurol 2007; 500: 585–599.

14.

Nagakubo

Taira

Kitaura

, et al. DJ-1, a novel oncogene which transforms mouse NIH3T3 cells in cooperation with ras. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 231: 509–513.

15.

Zhou

Zhu

Wilson

, et al. The oxidation state of DJ-1 regulates its chaperone activity toward alpha-synuclein. J Mol Biol 2006; 356: 1036–1048.

16.

Shendelman

Jonason

Martinat

, et al. DJ-1 is a redox-dependent molecular chaperone that inhibits alpha-synuclein aggregate formation. PLoS Biol 2004; 2: e362.

17.

Abou-Sleiman

Healy

Quinn

, et al. The role of pathogenic DJ-1 mutations in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol 2003; 54: 283–286.

18.

Chen

Peng

, et al. Association of the DJ-1 gene polymorphism with sporadic Parkinson’s disease in Sichuan province of China. Chin J Med Gen 2008; 25: 566–569.

19.

Liu

Guo

, et al. Relationship between the monocyte of the g.168 185del polymorphism of the promoter in DJ-1 gene and Parkinson's disease. J Clin Neurol 2008; 21: 267–269.

20.

Yan

Yang

XL.

Association between the polymorphism of DJ-1 gene g 168_185del and Parkinson's disease in Xinjiang Uygurs and Hans. J Clin Neurol 2012: 189–191.

21.

Cai

Duan

Ouyang

, et al. Mutation analysis of DJ-1 in patients with early-onset Parkinson’s disease and relationship between the g 168_85del polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease. Chin J Neurol 2013; 46: 655–658.

22.

De Marco

Annesi

Tarantino

, et al. DJ-1 is a Parkinson's disease susceptibility gene in southern Italy. Clin Genet 2010; 77: 183–188.

23.

Eerola

Hernandez

Launes

, et al. Assessment of a DJ-1 (PARK7) polymorphism in Finnish PD. Neurology 2003; 61: 1000–1002.

24.

Sadhukhan

Biswas

Das

, et al. DJ-1 variants in Indian Parkinson's disease patients. Dis Markers 2012; 33: 127–135.

25.

Glanzmann

Lombard

Carr

, et al. Screening of two indel polymorphisms in the 5'UTR of the DJ-1 gene in South African Parkinson's disease patients. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2014; 121: 135–138.

26.

Morris

O'Brien

Gibson

, et al. Polymorphism in the human DJ-1 gene is not associated with sporadic dementia with Lewy bodies or Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett 2003; 352: 151–153.

27.

Huo

Luo

Zhan

, et al. Genetic analysis of indel markers in three loci associated with Parkinson's disease. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0184269.

28.

Lin

Pan

, et al. Lack of association between DJ-1 gene promoter polymorphism and the risk of Parkinson’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2019; 11: 24.

29.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 3: 123–130.

30.

Wells

Shea

O’Connell

, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised studies in Meta-analyses; 2011. http: //www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed 5 November 2014).

31.

Higgins

Thompson

SG.

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539–1558.

32.

Zintzaras

Ioannidis

JP.

Heterogeneity testing in meta-analysis of genome searches.

Genet Epidemiol 2005; 28: 123–137.

33.

Patsopoulos

Evangelou

Ioannidis

JP.

Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation. Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37: 1148–1157.

34.

Egger

Davey

Schneider

, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629–634.

35.

Griffiths

Miller

Suzuki

, et al. An Introduction to Genetic Analysis. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co, 2000.

36.

Siegel

Hampton

Rabinstein

, et al. Oxygen therapy with high-flow nasal cannula as an effective treatment for perioperative pneumocephalus: case illustrations and pathophysiological review. Neurocrit Care 2018; 29: 366–373.

37.

Kim

Peters

Jang

, et al. DJ-1, a novel regulator of the tumor suppressor PTEN. Cancer Cell 2005; 7: 263–273.

38.

Wagenfeld

Yeung

Strupat

, et al. Shedding of a rat epididymal sperm protein associated with infertility induced by ornidazole and alpha-chlorohydrin. Biol Reprod 1998; 58: 1257–1265.

39.

Maita

Iguchi-Ariga

, et al. Monomer DJ-1 and its N-terminal sequence are necessary for mitochondrial localization of DJ-1 mutants. PLoS One 2013; 8: e54087.

40.

Choi

Sullards

Olzmann

, et al. Oxidative damage of DJ-1 is linked to sporadic Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 10816–10824.

41.

Bandopadhyay

Kingsbury

Cookson

, et al. The expression of DJ-1 (PARK7) in normal human CNS and idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Brain 2004; 127: 420–430.

42.

Waragai

Wei

Fujita

, et al. Increased level of DJ-1 in the cerebrospinal fluids of sporadic Parkinson's disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 345: 967–972.

43.

Shinbo

Taira

Niki

, et al. DJ-1 restores p53 transcription activity inhibited by Topors/p53BP3. Int J Oncol 2005; 26: 641–648.

44.

Fan

Ren

Jia

, et al. DJ-1 decreases Bax expression through repressing p53 transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 4022–4030.

45.

Junn

Taniguchi

Jeong

, et al. Interaction of DJ-1 with Daxx inhibits apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 activity and cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 9691–9696.

46.

Karunakaran

Diwakar

Saeed

, et al. Activation of apoptosis signal regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) and translocation of death-associated protein, Daxx, in substantia nigra pars compacta in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease: protection by alpha-lipoic acid. FASEB J 2007; 21: 2226–2236.

47.

Maita

Tsuji

Yabe

, et al. Secretion of DJ-1 into the serum of patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett 2008; 431: 86–89.