Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to examine the effect of interactions between serotonin (5-HT), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and kisspeptin on the reproductive potential in women receiving in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Methods

Paired serum and follicular fluid (FF) samples were obtained from 30 consecutive patients receiving IVF. Primary and secondary outcome measures were the rate of chemical/clinical pregnancy and the number of mature oocytes and embryos, respectively. Serum and FF 5-HT, BDNF, kisspeptin, and platelet-activating factor (PAF) levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

In response to ovarian hyperstimulation, serum 5-HT and kisspeptin levels significantly increased, whereas serum BDNF and PAF levels remained unchanged. These factors were detected in FF, but they were unrelated to serum levels. FF 5-HT and BDNF levels were positively correlated. Serum kisspeptin levels were negatively correlated with FF BDNF and serum and FF PAF levels. Women who were pregnant had significantly lower FF BDNF levels compared with women who were not pregnant (21.96±12.75 vs 47.63±52.90 µg/mL). Multivariate stepwise linear regression and logistic regression analyses showed that only 5-HT and kisspeptin improved IVF outcome.

Conclusions

This study indicates a role of serotoninergic mechanisms in success of IVF, but the contribution of interacting neuropeptides requires additional investigation.

Keywords

follicular fluid serotonin kisspeptin brain-derived neurotrophic factor ovarian hyperstimulation

Introduction

Serotonin (5-HT) regulates the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis and 5-HT is involved in female reproduction. Previous studies have shown that 5-HT axons terminate on gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons in the hypothalamus¹ and 5-HT regulates GnRH gene expression and GnRH secretion^2,3 by activating specific 5-HT receptors. GnRH then acts on pituitary gonadotropins to stimulate the synthesis and release of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH).^4,5 FSH and LH are responsible for controlling steroidogenesis, folliculogenesis, and oogenesis in female ovaries.^4,5 Along with their crucial role in the control of reproductive function, hypothalamic neuropeptides and neurotransmitters are intimately involved in the regulation of energy homeostasis, and emotional and feeding behaviour.^6–9

Approximately 4% of patients with IVF take a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI).¹⁰ The use of SSRIs before or during pregnancy is associated with reduced infertility treatment efficiency and an adverse pregnancy outcome.^11,12 Although the mechanisms of unfavorable actions of SSRIs on reproductive outcome have not been clearly established, 5-HT or elements of the 5-HT pathway appear to be implicated. In addition to serotoninergic regulation of ovarian function at the hypothalamic level, direct involvement of 5-HT in intraovarian regulation has also been shown. Previous studies showed that 5-HT was detected in follicular fluid (FF) and it stimulated progesterone production in bovine luteal cells^13,14 and in human granulosa cells.¹⁵ Further evidence for the involvement of 5-HT in the reproductive process is indicated by the complex interrelationship between 5-HT and neuropeptides (brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], kisspeptin).^16–19 These neuropeptides play an important role in hypothalamic or intraovarian regulation of reproduction.

The present study was performed to examine the function of the neuroendocrine–reproductive axis in women undergoing IVF treatment. This study aimed to (1) investigate the response patterns of 5-HT, BDNF, and kisspeptin to ovarian hyperstimulation, (2) to assess the relationship between serum and FF levels of these hormones, (3) to determine whether changes, if any, in these hormone levels are related to platelet activation or they are independent of platelets, and (4) to establish the effects of 5-HT, BDNF, and kisspeptin individually or in combination on reproductive performance.

Methods

Patients

This cross-sectional, observational, clinical study was carried out between 1 September 2016 and 1 December 2016 in the Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary. The STROBE guideline for cross-sectional studies was used to ensure the reporting of this study.²⁰ The study comprised 30 consecutive patients who were indicated for fertility treatment (IVF). Eligible patients were recruited according to the date of the fertility consultation. They did not have metabolic or vascular diseases (obesity, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, fatty liver disease, and atherosclerosis), or psychiatric drug therapy. Enrolment of patients into the IVF procedure was approved by two independent physicians.²¹ Superovulation treatment, fertilization methods, and embryo selection were performed according to standard protocols as described in our previous publication.²²

Collection of blood serum and FF

Blood samples were obtained from the patients before the stimulated cycle on the 21st day of their menstrual cycle and in the morning of follicle puncture, before sedation. The collected FF was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 252 × g. The supernatants were frozen and stored at −80°C for future analysis.

Laboratory measurements

Hormone measurements were performed using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Kits for 5-HT were produced by IBL International GmbH (Hamburg, Germany). The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation (CVs) for 5-HT were 3.8% to 6.6% and 9.4% to 18.1%, respectively, with a detection limit of 2.68 ng/mL. BDNF Human kits were used (RayBiotech, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA) with intra- and interassay CVs of <10% and <12%, respectively, and a detection limit of 80 pg/mL. Kisspeptin 54 Human kits were provided by Peninsula Laboratories International (San Carlos, CA, USA). The intra- and interassay CVs of kisspeptin were <10% and <15%, respectively, with a detection limit of 3 ng/mL. For human PAF kits (Abbexa Ltd, Cambridge, UK), the intra- and interassay CVs were <10% and <12%, respectively, with a detection limit of 50 pg/mL.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was reviewed and approved by the Human Reproduction Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council (5273-2/2012/EHR). Signed informed consent was obtained from all patients who participated in the study. The investigation conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Normality of data distribution was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Depending on distribution, either the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare continuous variables. The association between two continuous variables was tested by using Spearman’s or Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Multiple linear or logistic regression models were used to identify the variables independently associated with IVF outcome parameters (number of oocytes, number of embryos, chemical/clinical pregnancy). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics of the patients

The clinical parameters of the patients are shown in Table 1. The patients had the following main diagnoses of infertility: male factors, damaged or blocked Fallopian tubes, other female factors, combined male and female factors, severe endometriosis, and unexplained infertility.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the patients.

Characteristics	All patients(n=30)	Pregnancy-negativegroup(n=23)	Pregnancy-positivegroup(n=7)	Intergroup difference
Age, years	34.7 ± 4.6	35.8 ± 4.1	31.0 ± 4.5	0.019
Nulligravid, n (%)	18 (60)	14 (60.9)	4 (57.1)	0.141
Nulliparous, n (%)	24 (80)	20 (87.0)	4 (57.1)	0.334
Duration of infertility, years	4.2 ± 2.1	21.0 ± 13.2	17.6 ± 16.9	0.266
Body mass index, kg/m²	23.9 ± 4.3	23.7 ± 4.6	24.4 ± 3.3	0.532
Cause of infertility, n (%)
Poor semen quality	7 (23.3)	5 (21.7)	2 (28.6)	0.974
Tubal factor	5 (16.7)	3 (13.0)	2 (28.6)
Endometriosis	4 ( 13.3 )	3 (13.0)	1 (14.3)
Other female factor	3 (10.0)	3 (13.0)	0
Combined male-female factor	4 (13.3)	4 (17.4)	0
Unexplained	7 (23.3)	5 (21.7)	2 (28.6)
No. of stimulation procedures initiated previously, n (%)
Cycle 0	11 (36.7)	7 (30.4)	4 (57.1)	0.127
Cycle 1	9 (30.0)	6 (26.1)	3 (42.9)
Cycle 2	7 (23.3)	7 (30.4)	0
Cycle 3	3 (10.0)	3 (13.0)	0
Cycle 4	0	0	0
Serum estradiol, pmol/L	1402.3 ± 950.3	1319.3 ± 1011.9	1706.7 ± 659.4	0.236
Total dose of gonadotropin, IU	2106.4 ± 976.1	0.8 ± 0.2	0.8 ± 0.2	0.532
Duration of stimulation, days	10.9 ± 2.6	14.1 ± 1.1	13.6 ± 1.0	0.266
No. of retrieved oocytes	5.2 ± 3.23	4.8 ± 2.5	6.6 ± 5.0	0.598
No. of matured oocytes (metaphasis II)	4.2 ± 2.7	3.8 ± 2.2	5.7 ± 4.0	0.311
No. of Grade 1 embryos	2.7 ± 1.4	2.4 ± 1.2	3.6 ± 1.9	0.174
No. of transferred embryos (fresh only)	1.9 ± 0.7	1.8 ± 0.8	2.0 ± 0.6	0.666
hCG on day 12, IU	279.0 ± 654.5	11.8 ± 28.9	1118.9 ± 954.7	<0.001
No. of chemical pregnancies, n (%)	8 (26.6)	1	7
No. of clinical pregnancies, n (%)	7 (23.3)	0	7

Numbers in bold indicate significance. hCG=human chorionic gonadotropin.

Evaluation of serum and FF hormone levels during IVF

In response to ovarian hyperstimulation, there was a significant increase in serum 5-HT and kisspeptin levels (p<0.01), whereas serum BDNF and PAF levels remained unchanged (Table 2). FF 5-HT and BDNF levels were markedly low, while those of kisspeptin and PAF were similar to their serum levels. When patients with (n = 7) and without (n = 23) clinical pregnancies were compared, ovarian hyperstimulation did not result in significant differences in either serum or FF levels of 5-HT and kisspeptin. However, pregnant patients had significantly lower FF BDNF levels compared with patients who were not pregnant (p = 0.026). Additionally, serum and FF PAF levels appeared to be reduced in pregnant patients, but this did not reach statistical significance.

Table 2.

Serum and follicular fluid hormone levels during in vitro fertilization.

	5-HT (ng/mL)			Kisspeptin (ng/mL)			BDNF (pg/mL)			PAF (pg/mL)
	Serum before OHS	Serum after OHS	Follicular fluid	Serum before OHS	Serum after OHS	Follicular fluid	Serum before OHS	Serum after OHS	Follicular fluid	Serum before OHS	Serum after OHS	Follicular fluid
All patients (n=30)
	**p ≤ 0.01			**p ≤ 0.01
Mean	173.60	238.87	13.14	0.50	0.79	0.67	566.90	585.25	41.64	844.84	818.70	658.62
SD	64.66	107.08	9.84	0.18	0.21	0.14	249.74	171.62	47.73	2274.79	2097.72	1854.47
Pregnancy-negative group (n=23)
	**p ≤ 0.01			**p ≤ 0.01
Mean	164.68	231.34	13.83	0.50	0.78	0.65	599.52	600.15	47.63	918.48	827.73	750.50
SD	56.54	97.33	10.68	0.19	0.23	0.14	245.65	170.35	52.90	2528.88	2249.94	2097.58
									⁺p = 0.026
Pregnancy-positive group (n=7)
	**p ≤ 0.01			**p ≤ 0.01
Mean	202.92	263.59	10.88	0.51	0.80	0.74	459.70	536.28	21.96	602.88	789.00	356.72
SD	84.73	140.54	6.46	0.18	0.13	0.12	250.43	179.75	12.75	1213.50	1644.93	592.12

SD=standard deviation, 5-HT=serotonin, BDNF=brain-derived neurotrophic factor, PAF=platelet-activating factor, OHS=ovarian hyperstimulation

The columns present data for serum samples before and after OHS and follicular fluid samples.

⁺Intergroup difference, ⁺p ≤ 0.05; *intragroup difference, **p ≤ 0.01.

Correlations between serum and FF hormone levels during IVF

To examine the possible contribution of circulating serum to FF hormone levels, we investigated the relationship between individual hormone levels that were measured simultaneously in serum and FF. Interestingly, there were no correlations between serum and FF levels of 5-HT, kisspeptin, BDNF, and PAF. Even when the patients of the pregnant group were analyzed separately, there were no significant associations between FF and serum hormone levels.

Univariate linear regression analysis of hormonal interactions showed a significant positive correlation between FF BDNF and 5-HT levels (R = 0.377, p = 0.040), but FF BDNF levels were inversely related to serum kisspeptin levels (R = −0.42, p = 0.022). Serum and FF PAF levels were negatively related to FF kisspeptin levels (R = −0.45, p = 0.013 and R = −0.43, p = 0.018, respectively) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Correlation between serum and follicular fluid hormone levels during in vitro fertilization (n=30).

	5-HT (ng/mL)			Kisspeptin (ng/mL)			BDNF (pg/mL)			PAF (pg/mL)
	Serum before OHS	Serum afterOHS	Follicularfluid	SerumbeforeOHS	Serum afterOHS	Follicularfluid	Serum before OHS	SerumafterOHS	Follicularfluid	SerumbeforeOHS	SerumafterOHS	Follicularfluid
5-HT (ng/mL)
Serum before OHS
R	1.000	0.777	0.198	0.139	−0.083	0.081	−0.006	0.078	−0.090	−0.042	−0.053	−0.069
p		<0.001	0.295	0.465	0.661	0.671	0.974	0.683	0.638	0.824	0.780	0.717
Serum after OHS
R	0.777	1.000	0.100	0.059	0.036	0.066	0.119	0.108	0.075	−0.049	−0.055	−0.073
p	<0.001		0.598	0.757	0.849	0.730	0.533	0.570	0.695	0.795	0.775	0.701
Follicular fluid
R	0.198	0.100	1.000	−0.061	−0.091	−0.020	0.002	0.034	0.377	−0.038	−0.038	−0.047
p	0.295	0.598		0.750	0.634	0.917	0.992	0.860	0.040	0.843	0.841	0.806
Kisspeptin (ng/mL)
Serum before OHS
R	0.139	0.059	−0.061	1.000	0.442	0.231	0.229	0.174	0.088	0.127	0.098	0.102
p	0.465	0.757	0.750		0.015	0.219	0.224	0.357	0.645	0.503	0.607	0.593
Serum after OHS
R	−0.083	0.036	−0.091	0.442	1.000	0.280	0.037	0.275	−0.416	−0.041	−0.039	−.028
p	0.661	0.849	0.634	0.015		0.134	0.845	0.141	0.022	0.828	0.838	0.882
Follicular fluid
R	0.081	0.066	−0.020	0.231	0.280	1.000	0.269	0.049	−0.197	−0.443	−0.446	−0.431
p	0.671	0.730	0.917	0.219	0.134		0.151	0.798	0.296	0.014	0.013	0.018
BDNF (ng/mL)
Serum before OHS
R	0.080	0.143	0.076	0.017	−0.073	0.123	1.000	0.157	0.453	−0.139	−0.142	−0.146
p	0.675	0.452	0.690	0.930	0.700	0.516		0.408	0.012	0.463	0.455	0.441
Serum after OHS
R	0.078	0.108	0.034	0.174	0.275	0.049	0.157	1.000	−0.281	−0.233	−0.248	−0.254
p	0.683	0.570	0.860	0.357	0.141	0.798	0.408		0.132	0.215	0.186	0.175
Follicular fluid
R	−0.090	0.075	0.377	0.088	−0.416	−0.197	0.453	−0.281	1.000	0.125	0.120	0.112
p	0.638	0.695	0.040	0.645	0.022	0.296	0.012	0.132		0.509	0.529	0.555
PAF (ng/mL)
Serum before OHS
R	−0.042	−0.049	−0.038	0.127	−0.041	−0.443	0.139	0.233	0.125	1.000	0.998	0.998
p	0.824	0.795	0.843	0.503	0.828	0.014	0.463	0.215	0.509		<0.001	<0.001
Serum after OHS
R	−0.053	−0.055	−0.038	0.098	−0.039	−0.446	0.142	−0.248	0.120	0.998	1.000	0.998
p	0.780	0.775	0.841	0.607	0.838	0.013	0.455	0.186	0.529	<0.001		<0.001
Follicular fluid
R	−0.069	−0.073	−0.047	0.102	−0.028	−0.431	−0.146	−0.254	0.112	0.998	0.998	1.000
p	0.717	0.701	0.806	0.593	0.882	0.018	0.441	0.175	0.555	<0.001	<0.001

Numbers in bold indicate significance. 5-HT=serotonin, BDNF=brain-derived neurotrophic factor, PAF=platelet-activating factor, OHS=ovarian hyperstimulation, R=correlation coefficient.

Table 4 shows the association between some selected clinical/laboratory variables and hormone levels that we measured in this study. We found that 5-HT levels were negatively affected by the age of the patients (R = −0.371, p = 0.043) and estradiol levels (R = −0.388, p = 0.041), and positively affected by the number of IVF cycles (R = 0.379, p = 0.043). Serum or FF BDNF levels were directly related to the number of IVF cycles (R = 0.469, p = 0.010) and FSH dosage (R = 0.362, p = 0.049). However, kisspeptin and PAF were independent of these variables.

Table 4.

Clinical and laboratory parameters affecting plasma and follicular fluid hormone levels during in vitro fertilization (n=30).

	5-HT (ng/mL)			Kisspeptin (ng/mL)			BDNF (pg/mL)			PAF (pg/mL)
	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3
Age (years)
R	−0.371	−0.225	−0.016	−0.017	−0.094	0.052	−0.038	0.128	0.203	−0.332	−0.337	−0.333
p	0.043*	0.232	0.931	0.927	0.621	0.786	0.844	0.500	0.281	0.073	0.068	0.072
No. of cycles
R	0.006	−0.093	0.379	0.047	0.173	0.102	0.063	0.469	−0.011	−0.043	−0.046	−0.043
p	0.976	0.630	0.043	0.809	0.370	0.598	0.745	0.010	0.954	0.823	0.811	0.823
E2 (pmol/L)
R	0.057	0.038	−0.388	−0.042	0.131	0.124	0.103	−0.087	−0.218	−0.033	−0.034	−0.041
p	0.774	0.849	0.041	0.833	0.507	0.528	0.602	0.660	0.264	0.869	0.864	0.836
FSH dosage (U/L)
R	0.041	−0.025	0.217	−0.043	−0.327	−0.010	0.097	−0.191	0.362	−0.016	−0.015	−0.006
p	0.830	0.895	0.250	0.820	0.077	0.959	0.611	0.312	0.049	0.933	0.937	0.973

Numbers in bold indicate significance. 5-HT=serotonin, BDNF=brain-derived neurotrophic factor, PAF=platelet-activating factor, E2=estradiol, FSH=follicle-stimulating hormone, R=correlation coefficient.

Numbers 1, 2, and 3 designate serum samples before (1) and after ovarian hyperstimulation (2), and follicular fluid samples (3).

The effects of clinical and hormonal parameters on the outcome measures in our patients with IVF were also evaluated. The numbers of oocytes, matured oocytes, and embryos, as well as serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels on day 12 and clinical pregnancy, were used as indices of outcome. We found that serum and FF BDNF levels significantly negatively affected these outcome measures (oocytes: R = −0.384, p = 0.038; mature oocytes: R = −0.432, p = 0.017; embryos: R = −0.384, p = 0.036). However, serum and FF 5-HT, kisspeptin, and PAF levels appeared to be independent of the outcome. Furthermore, there were significant negative associations of the FSH dosage for hyperstimulation with the number of mature oocytes (R = −0.422, p = 0.020), the number of embryos (R = −0.434, p = 0.017), and hCG levels on day 12 (R = −0.399, p = 0.032). Similarly, serum hCG levels were negatively related to maternal age (R = −0.388, p = 0.038) and to the number of IVF cycles (R = −0.402, p = 0.034). Serum estradiol levels and the patients’ body mass index did not affect the outcome measures (Table 5).

Table 5.

Hormonal and clinical parameters affecting reproductive potential during in vitro fertilization (n=30).

	Oocyte number	Mature oocyte number	Embryo number	hCG levels (IU) on day 12
Hormonal parameters
5-HT (ng/mL)
1
R	0.246	0.197	0.190	0.161
p	0.189	0.296	0.314	0.403
2
R	0.327	0.306	0.256	0.062
p	0.078	0.100	0.172	0.751
3
R	−0.261	−0.305	−0.170	−0.227
p	0.163	0.101	0.370	0.237
Kisspeptin (ng/mL)
1
R	−0.101	−0.184	−0.009	0.216
p	0.594	0.330	0.964	0.262
2
R	0.310	0.252	0.307	−0.154
p	0.096	0.179	0.099	0.425
3
R	0.153	0.099	0.192	0.129
p	0.420	0.603	0.310	0.504
BDNF (ng/mL)
1
R	−0.080	−0.229	−0.041	−0.245
p	0.675	0.224	0.830	0.200
2
R	0.109	0.124	0.116	−0.178
p	0.566	0.514	0.541	0.355
3
R	−0.381	−0.432	−0.384	−0.322
p	0.038	0.017	0.036	0.088
PAF (ng/mL)
1
R	0.003	0.084	0.142	0.131
p	0.988	0.659	0.453	0.499
2
R	0.004	0.084	0.141	0.147
p	0.982	0.659	0.459	0.447
3
R	0.002	0.082	0.137	0.129
p	0.991	0.668	0.470	0.503
Clinical parameters
Age (years)
R	−0.255	−0.258	−0.250	−0.388
p	0.173	0.169	0.182	0.038
BMI (kg/m²)
R	0.067	0.096	0.087	−0.017
p	0.723	0.615	0.647	0.929
No. of cycles
R	−0.027	−0.193	−0.059	−0.402
p	0.889	0.315	0.763	0.034
E2 (pmol/L)
R	0.303	0.309	0.218	0.182
p	0.117	0.110	0.264	0.353
FSH dosage
R	−0.321	−0.422	−0.434	−0.399
p	0.084	0.020	0.017	0.032
hCG levels (IU) on day 12
R	0.214	0.277	0.294	1.000
p	0.266	0.146	0.122

Numbers in bold indicate significance. 5-HT=serotonin, BDNF=brain-derived neurotrophic factor, PAF=platelet-activating factor, BMI=body mass index, E2=estradiol, FSH=follicle-stimulating hormone, hCG=human chorionic gonadotropin, R=correlation coefficient.

Numbers 1, 2, and 3 designate serum samples before (1) and after ovarian hyperstimulation (2), and follicular fluid samples (3).

Further evaluation of the results by using multivariate stepwise linear regression showed (Model 1, R² = 0.336) that the number of oocytes, as the dependent variable, was significantly affected by post-stimulation serum 5-HT levels (β = 0.447, p = 0.015) and FF 5-HT levels (β = −0.433, p = 0.016), as well as by the hyperstimulation-induced increase in serum kisspeptin levels (Model 2, R² = 0.159, β = 0.398, p = 0.029). When clinical pregnancy was considered as the dependent variable, multivariate logistic regression showed (Model 3, R² = 0.595) significantly elevated serum 5-HT levels in pregnant women (β = 1.028, p = 0.047) and a tendency for a lower FSH dosage (β = 0.997, p = 0.076) compared with non-pregnant women.

Discussion

The present study showed that in patients undergoing IVF, serum 5-HT and kisspeptin levels were significantly increased in response to ovarian hyperstimulation, whereas BDNF and PAF levels remained unchanged. All of these hormones/factors were detected in FF, but FF levels were unrelated to serum levels. Furthermore, a significant positive correlation was found between FF 5-HT and BDNF levels, and serum kisspeptin levels were negatively correlated with FF BDNF and with serum and FF PAF levels. Importantly, multivariate stepwise linear regression and logistic regression analyses showed that only 5-HT and kisspeptin affected outcome measures (oocyte number, clinical pregnancy).

The role of 5-HT in human reproduction has received renewed interest because of widespread use of SSRIs in women of reproductive age.^{10–12,23,24} SSRI use is associated with the potential of reproductive failure. However, the neuroendocrine mechanism(s) of SSRI-induced reproductive dysfunction is not clearly defined.

Recent discoveries of the interactions of 5-HT and neuropeptides have allowed further insight into serotoninergic regulation of reproduction.^19,25,26 A possible role of BDNF has been established. The brain is the major source of BDNF production, although several peripheral tissues, including vascular endothelium, smooth muscle cells, and activated mononuclear white blood cells, also contribute. Transport of BDNF is achieved by platelets, and in response to platelet activation, BDNF is released into the plasma together with 5-HT. Feedforward regulation has been demonstrated between BDNF and 5-HT release.^27–30

With regard to BDNF and its receptor in reproduction, neurotrophic tyrosine kinase B (TrkB) has been detected in the ovaries and it is thought to modulate ovarian function.³¹ The autocrine/paracrine BDNF/TrkB signaling system is required for folliculogenesis, oocyte maturation, implantation, and early embryo and placental development.^{16,17,32–34} In women undergoing IVF, circulating estradiol levels are positively associated with BDNF levels.³⁵ BDNF that is secreted by cumulus and granulosa cells is responsive to hCG, LH, and to a lesser extent, FSH stimulation.^36,37 A recent study showed that serum BDNF levels before initiation of the IVF cycle predicted pregnancy outcome.³⁸ This study also showed that patients who became pregnant had significantly reduced BDNF levels compared with those who did not become pregnant. Our study showed a significant negative effect of BDNF levels on the number of oocytes and embryos and on the rate of chemical and clinical pregnancy. The significant association between FF 5-HT and FF BDNF levels can be regarded as evidence for an indirect contribution of BDNF to improvement of reproductive potential via stimulating 5-HT production. Interestingly, neither 5-HT nor BDNF levels were related to PAF levels, which suggested that their release was independent of platelet activation.

The hypothalamus-based kisspeptin/KISS IR signaling system is a major positive regulator of reproduction.³⁹ Kisspeptin and its receptors are expressed in the ovary and they are thought to be implicated in the regulation of follicular maturation, oocyte survival, embryo implantation, and placentation.^18,40 Interestingly, ovarian-derived kisspeptin and BDNF are assumed to act together to promote oocyte survival,¹⁹ and low neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2/KISS 1R signaling in oocytes causes premature ovarian failure.⁴¹ In our clinical setting, FF kisspeptin levels were not correlated with FF BDNF, but 5-HT and kisspeptin levels had a beneficial effect on the number of oocytes and on the rate of clinical pregnancy. These findings are consistent with recent observations, which showed that kisspeptin-54 administration in a single dose or in repeated doses improved oocyte maturation by inducing a controlled LH surge in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.^42,43

Study limitations

Only a limited number of patients with IVF were included in our study. Therefore we could not create homogenous subgroups according to the causes of infertility. Furthermore, only a few individual biomarkers were selected and measured in our study. Therefore, we were not able to examine the complex network of interrelated biologically active compounds relevant to the success of IVF. Further randomized, controlled studies with a larger sample size of patients with homogenous diagnoses need to be conducted to better define the concept of “brainwork in the ovary”. Moreover, a more reliable diagnostic test needs to be developed to assess the IVF success rate and to introduce more targeted therapy to improve efficiency of IVF.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing IVF, we evaluated serum and FF levels of 5-HT, kisspeptin, BDNF, and PAF. There is a positive correlation between FF BDNF and FF 5-HT levels, and inverse correlations between serum kisspeptin levels and FF BDNF and serum and FF PAF levels. Importantly, only 5-HT and kisspeptin affect outcome measures (oocyte number, clinical pregnancy). These observations suggesting that ovarian 5-HT, BDNF, and kisspeptin act in concert to improve reproductive potential need to be further substantiated in the future.

List of abbreviations

5-HT serotonin

BDNF brain-derived neurotrophic factor

BMI body-mass index

CV coefficient of variation

FF follicular fluid

FSH follicle-stimulating hormone

GnRH gonadotropin-releasing hormone

hCG human chorionic gonadotropin

IVF in vitro fertilization

LH luteinizing hormone

PAF platelet-activating factor

SSRI serotonin reuptake inhibitor

TrkB tyrosine kinase B

OHS ovarian hyperstimulation

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We thank the women who underwent IVF treatment at the Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pécs, for participating in our study.

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009, Development of Scientific Workshops of Medical, Health Sciences and Pharmaceutical Educations. The funding source did not have any role in the study design; in collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or in writing and submitting this manuscript.

ORCID iD

Viktória Prémusz

References

Kiss

Halasz

Demonstration of serotoninergic axons terminating on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons in the preoptic area of the rat using a combination of immunocytochemistry and high resolution autoradiography.

Neuroscience 1985; 14: 69–78.

Pelletier

Involvement of serotonin in the regulation of GnRH gene expression in the male rat brain.

Neuropeptides 1995; 29: 21–25.

Arias

Szwarcfarb

de Rondina

, et al. In vivo and in vitro studies on the effect of the serotoninergic system on luteinizing hormone and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone secretion in prepubertal and peripubertal female rats. Brain Res 1990; 523: 57–61.

Hery

Francois-Bellan

Hery

, et al. Serotonin directly stimulates luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release from GT1 cells via 5-HT7 receptors. Endocrine 1997; 7: 261–265.

Wada

, et al. Serotonin (5-HT) receptor subtypes mediate specific modes of 5-HT-induced signaling and regulation of neurosecretion in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Mol Endocrinol 2006; 20: 125–135.

Recinella

Chiavaroli

Ferrante

, et al. Effects of central RVD-hemopressin(alpha) administration on anxiety, feeding behavior and hypothalamic neuromodulators in the rat. Pharmacol Rep 2018; 70: 650–657.

Orlando

Leone

Ferrante

, et al. Effects of kisspeptin-10 on hypothalamic neuropeptides and neurotransmitters involved in appetite control. Molecules 2018; 23: pii: E3071.

Leone

Ferrante

Recinella

, et al. Effects of RVD-hemopressin (alpha) on feeding and body weight after standard or cafeteria diet in rats. Neuropeptides 2018; 72: 38–46.

Erdei

Borbely

Magyar

, et al. Biochemical and pharmacological investigation of novel nociceptin/OFQ analogues and N/OFQ-RYYRIK hybrid peptides. Peptides 2019; 112: 106–113.

10.

Domar

Moragianni

Ryley

, et al. The risks of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use in infertile women: a review of the impact on fertility, pregnancy, neonatal health and beyond. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 160–171.

11.

Klock

Sheinin

Kazer

, et al. A pilot study of the relationship between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 968–969.

12.

Friedman

Rogers

Shahine

, et al. Effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1312–1314.

13.

Battista

Condon

WA.

Serotonin-induced stimulation of progesterone production by cow luteal cells in vitro.

J Reprod Fertil 1986; 76: 231–238.

14.

Battista

Rexroad

Jr Condon

WA.

Mechanisms involved in the action of serotonin-induced stimulation of progesterone production by bovine luteal cells in vitro.

Mol Cell Endocrinol 1987; 51: 145–151.

15.

Bodis

Torok

Tinneberg

, et al. Serotonin induces progesterone release from human granulosa cells in a superfused granulosa cell system. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1993; 253: 59–64.

16.

Kawamura

Sato

, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes implantation and subsequent placental development by stimulating trophoblast cell growth and survival. Endocrinology 2009; 150: 3774–3782.

17.

Linher-Melville

The roles of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor during the final stage of folliculogenesis: a focus on oocyte maturation.

Reproduction 2013; 145: R43–R54.

18.

Hameed

Jayasena

Dhillo

WS.

Kisspeptin and fertility.

J Endocrinol 2011; 208: 97–105.

19.

Anderson

RA.

Brainwork in the ovary: kisspeptin and BDNF signaling converge to ensure oocyte survival.

Endocrinology 2014; 155: 2751–2753.

20.

von Elm

Altman

Egger

, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 2014; 12: 1495–1499.

21.

Betlehem

Boncz

Oláh

Scientific Publications in Health Sciences [Tudományos közlések az egészségtudományban]. Nővér. 2010; 23: 4–11.

22.

Varnagy

Bodis

Kovacs

, et al. Metabolic hormones in follicular fluid in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Med 2013; 58: 305–311.

23.

Huybrechts

Sanghani

Avorn

, et al. Preterm birth and antidepressant medication use during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e92778.

24.

Serafini

Lobo

Grosman

, et al. Fluoxetine treatment for anxiety in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 136–139.

25.

Sirotkin

Schaeffer

HJ.

Direct regulation of mammalian reproductive organs by serotonin and melatonin. J Endocrinol 1997; 154: 1–5.

26.

Stebelova

Zeman

Cornelissen

, et al. Chronomics reveal and quantify circadian rhythmic melatonin in duodenum of rats. Biomed Pharmacother 2005; 59 Suppl 1: S209–S212.

27.

Karege

Schwald

Cisse

Postnatal developmental profile of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rat brain and platelets.

Neurosci Lett 2002; 328: 261–264.

28.

Rasmussen

Brassard

Adser

, et al. Evidence for a release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor from the brain during exercise. Exp Physiol 2009; 94: 1062–1069.

29.

Radka

Holst

Fritsche

, et al. Presence of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in brain and human and rat but not mouse serum detected by a sensitive and specific immunoassay. Brain Res 1996; 709: 122–301.

30.

Mattson

Maudsley

Martin

BDNF and 5-HT: a dynamic duo in age-related neuronal plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders.

Trends Neurosci 2004; 27: 589–594.

31.

Shibayama

Koizumi

Cellular localization of the Trk neurotrophin receptor family in human non-neuronal tissues.

Am J Pathol 1996; 148: 1807–1818.

32.

Paredes

Romero

Dissen

, et al. TrkB receptors are required for follicular growth and oocyte survival in the mammalian ovary. Dev Biol 2004; 267: 430–449.

33.

Seifer

Feng

Shelden

, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a novel human ovarian follicular protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 655–659.

34.

Kawamura

Mulders

, et al. Ovarian brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promotes the development of oocytes into preimplantation embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 9206–9211.

35.

Monteleone

Artini

Simi

, et al. Brain derived neurotrophic factor circulating levels in patients undergoing IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007; 24: 477–480.

36.

Feng

Chen

Shelden

, et al. Effect of gonadotropins on brain-derived neurotrophic factor secretion by human follicular cumulus cells. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 658–659.

37.

Zhao

Qiao

Huang

, et al. Gonadotrophin-induced paracrine regulation of human oocyte maturation by BDNF and GDNF secreted by granulosa cells. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 695–702.

38.

Ramer

Kanninen

Sisti

, et al. The serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentration prior to initiation of an in vitro fertilization cycle predicts outcome. J Reprod Immunol 2016; 116: 46–49.

39.

de Roux

Genin

Carel

, et al. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism due to loss of function of the KiSS1-derived peptide receptor GPR54. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 10972–10976.

40.

Bhattacharya

Babwah

AV.

Kisspeptin: beyond the brain.

Endocrinology 2015; 156: 1218–1227.

41.

Dorfman

Garcia-Rudaz

Alderman

, et al. Loss of Ntrk2/Kiss1r signaling in oocytes causes premature ovarian failure. Endocrinology 2014; 155: 3098–3111.

42.

Abbara

Clarke

Islam

, et al. A second dose of kisspeptin-54 improves oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a Phase 2 randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2017; 32: 1915–1924.

43.

Abbara

Jayasena

Christopoulos

, et al. Efficacy of kisspeptin-54 to trigger oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100: 3322–3331.

Serum and follicular fluid levels of serotonin,kisspeptin,and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: an observational study

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Patients

Collection of blood serum and FF

Laboratory measurements

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Statistical analysis

Results

Clinical characteristics of the patients

Evaluation of serum and FF hormone levels during IVF

Correlations between serum and FF hormone levels during IVF

Discussion

Study limitations

Conclusions

List of abbreviations

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interest

Funding

ORCID iD

References