Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of methylene blue in preventing recurrent symptomatic postoperative adhesions.

Methods

Patients with a history of >2 surgeries for intra-abdominal adhesion-related complications were selected for this study. Adhesiolysis surgery was subsequently performed using administration of 1% methylene blue. The follow-up period was 28.5 ± 11.1 months.

Results

Data were available from 20 patients (seven men and 13 women) whose mean ± SD age was 51.2 ± 11.4 years. Adhesions took longer to become symptomatic after the first abdominal surgery when the initial pathology was malignant compared with benign. However, the recurrence of adhesions after a previous adhesiolysis surgery had a similar time onset regardless of the initial disease. Following adhesiolysis surgery with methylene blue, the majority of patients did not present with symptoms associated with adhesion complications (i.e., chronic abdominal pain, bowel obstruction) for the length of the follow-up period.

Conclusions

The use of methylene blue during adhesiolysis surgery appears to reduce the recurrence of adhesion-related symptoms, suggesting a beneficial effect in the prevention of adhesion formation.

Keywords

Postoperative adhesions methylene blue bowel obstruction

Introduction

Peritoneal adhesions are one of the most common postoperative complications following classical or laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic surgery. The rate of postoperative adhesion formation is high and studies indicate that they occur in 50–100% of cases^1,2 and have even higher recurrence rates (85–93%).^3,4Complications generated by postoperative adhesions can result in significant health problems. For example, 40% of all bowel obstructions and 65–75% of small bowel obstructions are caused by postoperative peritoneal adhesions.⁵ Additionally, 40% of cases of chronic postoperative abdominal pain occur solely as a result of peritoneal adhesions with another 25% having peritoneal adhesions as one of the causative factors.^6,7,8 One study suggested that peritoneal adhesions are responsible for secondary infertility in women in 15–20% of cases⁹ whereas other reports suggest that they are causative in 40–50% of cases.^10,11

Several strategies have been suggested as methods of reducing the rate of post-operative peritoneal adhesion formation. They include: use of minimally invasive surgical procedures; minimal operation time; reduction of light exposure and thermal peritoneal procedures; reduction of peritoneal bleeding; evacuation of haematic fluid collection and lavage of the abdominal cavity; avoidance of peritoneal trauma by coagulation or dehydration; prevention of septic contamination; minimal use of alloplastic materials inside the peritoneal cavity (i.e., mesh, sutures, drainage tubes, talc from surgical gloves); use of various anti-adhesive substances.^12,13 For recurrent adhesions, especially in cases where high-grade adhesions are present, some of the aforementioned recommendations cannot be applied. For these patients, the use of adhesion-reducing adjuvants may be considered and various substances have been used, including saline, dextran, heparin, hyaluronic acid.¹ Data from several studies suggest that icodextrin or hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose (HA–CMC) are effective adhesion-inhibiting substances. ¹⁴ However, these agents are expensive and so the present study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of methylene blue as an anti-adhesive agent.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of data collected from patients that presented with bowel obstruction or chronic abdominal pain syndrome, secondary to grade IV generalized abdominal adhesions (according to the Bhatia classification)¹⁵ between January 2011 and December 2015 at the Emergency City Hospital of Timisoara, Romania. Inclusion criteria were: intra-abdominal adhesions (grade IV according to the Bhatia classification) ¹⁵ following surgical treatment for either a non-malignant or malignant pathology; at least two open adhesiolysis surgeries without the use of methylene blue; recurrent symptoms. Patients excluded from the study included those with positive cytology and/or peritoneal biopsy for malignancy, abdominal mesh or other alloplastic material repairs, and/or septic contamination of the peritoneal cavity after the opening of an intestinal loop during adhesiolysis during the previous surgery.

Eligible patients had subsequently undergone adhesiolysis surgery using methylene blue. Following open surgery through blunt or sharp dissection, 50 ml methylene blue (1%) had been instilled into the abdominal cavity and the abdominal wound had been closed. After 12 h, a drainage tube was unclamped for 48 h. The patients’ vital signs (i.e., blood pressure, body temperature, oxygen saturation and urine output), postoperative wound and the aspect and quantity of drained fluid were monitored until the first post-operative bowel movement had occurred. Postoperative pain was quantified using an audio-visual scale¹⁶ and haemoglobin, white blood cell count, and hepatic and renal parameters were recorded. Short- and long-term complications suggestive of a recurrence of intra-abdominal adhesions (e.g., chronic abdominal pain, complete or incomplete bowel obstruction) were also monitored. Patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed by an investigator (M.I.) for baseline demographic characteristics and operative data after the procedure.

Patient written informed consent was obtained and approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Emergency City Hospital, Timisoara, Romania.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0 for Windows^®; (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, USA) and a P-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and range. Student’s t-test, χ² analysis, Fischer’s exact test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for establishing statistical significance between variables.

Results

Data were available from 20 patients (seven men and 13 women) whose mean ± SD age was 51.2 ± 11.4 years. Initial pathology that required surgical intervention was classified according to the malignant or non-malignant (i.e., benign) characteristics of the disease. For malignant disease, the origin was described as either gastrointestinal (GI) or gynaecological, while benign disorders included abdominal wall defects or sepsis of the reproductive or GI tracts. Patient characteristics according to initial diagnosis are shown in Table 1. Of the 20 patients, 11 had malignant disease and nine had benign disease.

Table 1.

Distribution of patients with intra-abdominal adhesions following surgical treatment for either a non-malignant or malignant pathology

Initial diagnosis	Male patientsn = 7	Female patientsn = 13	All patientsn = 20
Malignant disease
Gastrointestinal	4 (20.0)	2 (10.0)	6 (30.0)	11 (55.0)
Gynaecological	0	5 (25.0)	5 (25.0)	11 (55.0)
Benign disease
Gastrointestinal sepsis	2 (10.0)	1 (5.0)	7 (35.0)	9 (45.0)
Gynaecological sepsis	0	4 (20.0)	7 (35.0)
Abdominal wall defect	1 (5.0)	1 (5.0)	2 (10.0)

Values are shown as n (%)

During the postoperative period after the initial surgery, all patients developed abdominal adhesions that required a further operation. Across all patients, the number of adhesiolysis surgeries required after the initial surgery was 2.6 ± 0.6 (range, 2–4); 11 (55%) patients underwent two surgeries, 8 (40%) patients had three surgical interventions and one patient had four surgeries. On admission, 16 (80%) patients had presented with bowel obstruction (six complete, 10 incomplete). In addition, four (20%) patients reported chronic pain following surgery that had not responded to standard treatment options. All patients had been examined to exclude other pathologies that may have been responsible for their clinical manifestations.

The time interval between initial surgery and first adhesiolysis surgery was significantly longer for the sub-group with malignant abdominal disease compared with the sub-group who had benign disease (11.7 ± 3.4 and 7.1 ± 2.4 months, respectively) (Table 2). The time to subsequent adhesiolysis surgery was similar in both groups (7.0 ± 2.3 and 7.3 ± 2.7 months, respectively).

Table 2.

Time intervals between adhesiolysis surgeries following surgical treatment for either a non-malignant or malignant pathology

	Malignant diseasen= 11		Benign diseasen = 9		All patientsn = 20		Statistical significance
	mean ± SD	range	mean ± SD	range	mean ± SD	range	Statistical significance
Time between initial surgery and first adhesiolysis (months)	11.7 ± 3.4	7–19	7.1 ± 2.4	4–11	9.6 ± 3.4	4–19	P = 0.001
Time to subsequent adhesiolysis (months)	7.0 ± 2.3	4–12	7.3 ± 2.7	3–12	7.2 ± 2.2	3–12	n.s.

During the postoperative period following adhesiolysis surgery with methylene blue, abdominal drainage was maintained for 48 h. On the first postoperative day, the drainage volume for all patients was approximately 200 ± 55 ml per day (range 100–350 ml). By the second day, average drainage volume had decreased to <100 ml which permitted removal of the drainage tubes.

Patients were monitored for 28.5 ± 11.1 months (range 9–57 months) following adhesiolysis surgery with methylene blue. Four (20%) patients reported chronic abdominal pain that was managed by minimal analgesic therapy (three of these patients had reported pain in the pre-adhesiolysis period. For three (15%) other patients, surgical treatment was required for pathologies independent of the initial disease and abdominal adhesions; in these cases, patients showed low grade adhesions with a limited extent in the peritoneal cavity (Bhatia grade II). ¹⁵

For all patients, the time between initial surgery and first adhesiolysis surgery was longer than the time to subsequent adhesiolysis surgery (9.6 ± 3.4 and 7.2 ± 2.2 months, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant (Table 2). However, analysis showed that these time intervals were statistically significantly (P=0.002) shorter than the symptom-free, follow- up period following adhesiolysis surgery with methylene blue (i.e., 28.5 ± 11.1 months)

No significant differences were observed in oxygen saturation or time interval until first flatus when values from previous adhesiolysis surgeries and adhesiolysis surgery with methylene blue were compared (Table 3). However, the level of post-operative pain and supplementary analgesic use was significantly elevated when previous adhesiolysis surgeries were compared with the adhesiolysis surgery with methylene blue (Table 3).

Table 3.

Postoperative parameters from patients undergoing adhesiolysis surgery

	After adhesiolysis surgeries without methylene blue (n = 20)	After adhesiolysis surgery with methylene blue (n = 20)	Statistical significance
Oxygen saturation, %	94.2 ± 4.3	94.5 ± 4.5	n.s.
Time to first flatus, h	44.5 ± 9	45.7 ± 8.6	n.s.
Postoperative pain score*	2.6 ± 1.2	4.3 ± 0.9	P = 0.001
Supplementary analgesic medication	0.6 ± 0.7	2.7 ± 1	P = 0.001

scale ranged 1 (no pain) to 5 (unbearable pain)¹⁶

Discussion

Complications caused by the formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions, whether following open or laparoscopic procedures, are of great importance not only because of their high incidence (50-100% of cases) but also because of the high rate of their recurrence (85-93% of cases).^1–5,9–11 Numerous studies have investigated various methods or strategies to minimize the risk of peritoneal adhesion formation; these studies have included optimization of surgical procedures and use of adhesion-reducing adjuvants.^{12,13,17–21} Several substances that may affect the pathogenesis of the peritoneal adhesions have been investigated, with HA-CMC and icodextrin being the most extensively studied, but as yet there is no consensus on the preferred treatment.¹⁴

The use of methylene blue as an anti-adhesive agent has been investigated in several experimental models ^20–25 and clinical studies.²⁶ Its mechanism of action was thought be via the non-selective inhibitory effect of nitric oxide (NO)-synthetase,^27,28 which reduces vasodilatation, capillary permeability, angiogenesis and collagen synthesis.^29,30 However, other NO-synthetase inhibitors, such as NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, do not have the same anti-adhesive effect.^29,30 Moreover, NO donors, such as L-arginine and spermine NONOate, have also been shown to reduce adhesion formation.^31–33 Furthermore, its mechanism of action cannot be related to a reduction in free radicals since other antioxidant substances (e.g., allopurinol, super oxide dismutase, vitamin E) are not as effective as methylene blue.^34,35 Other studies suggest that methylene blue reduces intraabdominal adhesion formation by enhancing peritoneal fibrinolytic activity.²³ Notably, its anti-adhesive effect was not observable within the first 24 hours but was significant after seven days.²² In summary, the prevention of peritoneal adhesion formation by methylene blue is probably a complex process involving acute inflammatory reaction, intermediate proliferative phase of fibrinolysis and eventually collagen formation and angiogenesis.²³

By contrast with previous studies that have evaluated the short-term (8-12 weeks) anti-adhesive proprieties of methylene blue,²⁶ our study cannot confirm that the agent prevents peritoneal adhesion formation. However, it did show that methylene blue was not associated with adhesion complications in a majority of patients for approximately 28.5 months.This period was significantly greater than previous recurrence periods when methylene blue was not used. The increase in postoperative pain and use of analgesics after surgery with methylene blue may be explained by the irritant effect of the agent on nerve endings in the peritoneal serosa.^36,37

The appearance of postoperative adhesions after initial surgery occurred significantly earlier in patients with benign pathologies compared with those with malignant disease. We suggest that this difference may have been due to a slower adhesion maturation process as a result of local metabolic changes caused by adjuvant anti-cancer treatment. The time between subsequent adhesiolysis surgeries was similar in malignant or benign disease groups. We believe this may be explained by a similarity in the adhesion formation process in all patients who were no longer suffering from septic peritoneal disease or undergoing oncological treatment.

The study had several limitations including its retrospective design, small sample size, lack of control group and possible selection bias. Nevertheless, the study highlights the need for further research on the anti-adhesive properties of methylene blue in randomized controlled trials involving large numbers of patients.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Weibel

Majno

Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study.

Am J Surg 1973; 126: 345–353

DiZerega

GS.

Contemporary adhesion prevention.

Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 219–235

Diamond

Freeman

ML.

Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions.

Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 567–576

Yesildaglar

Koninckx

PR.

Adhesion formation in intubated rabbits increases with high insufflation pressure during endoscopic surgery.

Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 687–669,

Menzies

Ellis

Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: How big is the problem?

Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990; 72: 60–63

DiZerega

GS.

Biochemical events in peritoneal tissue repair.

Eur J Surg Suppl 1997; 577: 10–16

Keltz

Gera

Olive

DL.

Prospective randomized trial of right-sided paracolic adhesiolysis for chronic pelvic pain.

JSLS 2006; 10: 443–446.

Swank

Swank-Bordewijk

Hop

et al.

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomized controlled multi-center trial.

Lancet 2003; 361: 1247–1251.

Stovall

Elder

Ling

FW.

Predictors of pelvic adhesions.

J Reprod Med 1989; 34: 345–348.

10.

Kistner

RW.

Peri-tubal and peri-ovarian adhesions subsequent to wedge resection of the ovaries.

Fertil Steril 1969; 20: 35–42

11.

Maruyama

Osuga

Momoeda

et al.

Pregnancy rates after laparoscopic treatment. Differences related to tubal status and presence of endometriosis. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 89–93

12.

Liakakos

Thomakos

Fine

et al.

Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance.

Dig Surg 2001; 18: 260–273.

13.

DeWilde

Trew

and on behalf of the Expert Adhesions Working Party of the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE). Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery. Expert consensus position. Part 2 - steps to reduce adhesions. Gynecol Surg 2007; 4: 243–253.

14.

Menzies

Pascual

Walz

et al.

Use of icodextrin 4% solution in the prevention of adhesion formation following general surgery: from the multicentre ARIEL registry.

Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 375–382.

15.

Bhatia

Allen

JE.

The prevention of experimentally induced postoperative adhesions. Am Surg 1997; 63:775–777.

16.

Melzack

: The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975; 1: 277–299.

17.

Gutt

Oniu

Schemmer

et al.

Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?

Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 898–906.

18.

Mais

Bracco

Litta

et al.

Reduction of postoperative adhesions with an auto-crosslinked hyaluronan gel in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a blinded, controlled, randomized, multicentre study.

Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1248–1254.

19.

Mettler

Audebert

Lehmann-Willenbrock

et al.

Prospective clinical trial of SpayGel as a barrier to adhesion formation: an interim analysis.

J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 339–344.

20.

El-Sayed

Galal

El-Gowelli

et al.

Inhibition of postsurgical adhesions by methylene blue-loaded nanofibers versus cast film matrices.

J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2016; 27: 1029–1044.

21.

Panahi

Sadraie

Khoshmohabat

et al.

Macroscopic and pathological assessment of methylene blue and normal saline on postoperative adhesion formation in a rat cecum model.

Int J Surg 2012; 10: 537–541

22.

Kluger

Weinbroum

Ben-Avraham

et al.

Reduction in formation of peritoneal adhesions by methylene blue in rats: a dose response study.

Eur J Surg 2000; 166: 568–571.

23.

Heydrick

Reed

Cohen

et al.

Intraperitoneal administration of methylene blue attenuates oxidative stress, increases peritoneal fibrinolysis, and inhibits intraabdominal adhesion formation.

J Surg Res 2007; 143: 311–319.

24.

Boztosun

Piçnak

Kosar

et al.

Effects of methylene blue, pentoxyphylline and enoxaparin on postoperative adhesion formation and markers of angiogenesis in a rat uterine horn model. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 89–95

25.

Kalaycı

Eroğlu

Kubilay

et al.

The effects of methylene blue on adhesion formation in a rat model of experimental peritonitis.

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011; 17: 205–209.

26.

Cao

Liu

Sun

XM.

Clinical study of the effect of methylene blue combined with aprotinin on intraperitoneal adhesion. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2005; 8: 24–25

27.

Mayer

Brunner

Schmidt

Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by methylene blue.

Biochem Pharmacol 1993; 45: 367–74.

28.

Galili

Ben-Abraham

Rabau

et al.

Reduction of surgery-induced peritoneal adhesions by methylene blue.

Am J Surg 1998; 175: 30–32.

29.

Witte

Barbul

Role of nitric oxide in wound repair.

Am J Surg 2002; 183: 406–412.

30.

Efron

Thornton

Steulten

et al.

Expression and function of inducible nitric oxide synthase during rat colon anastomotic healing.

J Gastrointest Surg 1999; 3: 592–601.

31.

Ozden

Bostanci

Sarioglu

et al.

Effect of nitric oxide on postoperative adhesion formation.

Eur Surg Res 1999; 31: 465–470.

32.

Gül

Kotan

Dilek

et al.

Effects of methylene blue, indigo carmine solution and autologous erytrocyte suspension on formation of adhesions after injection into rats.

J Reprod Fertil 2000; 120: 225–259

33.

Kaleli

Ozden

Aybek

et al.

The effect of L-arginine and pentoxifylline on postoperative adhesion formation.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 377–380.

34.

Salaris

Babbs

Voorhees

III

. Methylene blue as an inhibitor of superoxide generation by xanthine oxidase.

Biochem Pharmacol 1991; 42: 499–506.

35.

Kelner

Bagnell

Hale

et al.

Methylene blue competes with paraquat for reduction by flavo-enzymes resulting in decreased superoxide production in the presence of heme proteins.

Arch Biochem Biophys 1988; 262: 422–426.

36.

Macia

Gallego

Garcia-Cobaleda

et al.

Methylene blue as a cause of chemical peritonitis in a patient on peritoneal dialysis. Clin Nephrol 1995; 43: 136–137.

37.

Nolan

DG.

Inflammatory peritonitis with ascites after methylene blue dye chromopertubation during diagnostic laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 2: 483–484.

Use of methylene blue in the prevention of recurrent intra-abdominal postoperative adhesions

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Statistical analyses

Results

Discussion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

References