Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives

A retrospective, observational study to evaluate the association between critical potassium values and clinical symptoms, and to define critical potassium limits in hospital inpatients of Chinese Han ethnicity.

Methods

Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) of Chinese Han ethnicity admitted to the Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, Zhejiang University, China, were sequentially enrolled. Inpatient data recorded on admission (or at first time during hospital stay for serum potassium values) between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2012 were used to calculate the percentage of patients with relevant clinical symptoms, the percentage of critical patients (presence of neurological symptoms and deterioration of at least two physiological systems), and the hospital prevalence of clinical symptoms. Correlations between critical serum potassium values and clinical symptoms were determined.

Results

Out of 3 665 included patients, 1 514 patients with a critical serum potassium value (as determined in the present study) were mainly treated in the intensive care unit or the haematology department (low serum potassium, ≤2.9 mmol/l), and Renal and Hepatitis departments (high serum potassium, ≥6.0 mmol/l). High critical serum potassium values (≥6.0 mmol/l) were significantly correlated with clinical symptoms (such as neurological symptoms, loss of appetite, oliguria and hypotension). Low critical serum potassium values (≤2.9 mmol/l) were significantly correlated with clinical symptoms (such as neurological symptoms, loss of appetite and dyspnoea).

Conclusions

Based on the present findings, the lower and upper critical potassium limits were defined as 2.9 mmol/l and 6.0 mmol/l, respectively.

Keywords

Serum potassium critical value critical value limit clinical symptoms

Introduction

Critical conditions caused by trauma or disease can be life threatening, and may be accompanied by organ dysfunction and abnormal laboratory marker values.¹ Critical values were first defined in 1972, as ‘pathophysiologic states at such variance with normal as to be life-threatening unless something is done promptly and for which some corrective action can be taken’.² Appropriate use of critical values improves patient outcome by ensuring that physicians are promptly notified of immediate life-threatening conditions; appropriate use of such values and also prevents the misuse or overuse of resources.³ The determination, documentation and communication of critical values has, therefore, become a widely recognized patient safety measure.^4,5 Moreover, according to the ISO 15189 standards of the Joint Commission International, the College of American Pathologists and the Chinese Hospital Association, patients’ critical values need to be reported to hospital management.^4–7

In the majority of clinical laboratories, critical serum potassium values have been established and included in the list of values to be measured.^8–10 Changes in the critical lower and/or upper limits of serum potassium may lead to an increase in the number of callbacks without concomitant improvement in patient care; alternatively they may lead to failure in bringing potentially harmful situations to the notice of clinicians.^10,11 The mean low and high critical potassium limits widely used by trauma and medical centres are 2.8 and 6.2 mmol/l, respectively, in adults. If outliers are eliminated, these values can help physicians improve the quality and efficiency of acute patient care and reduce unnecessary notifications.^11,12

The accepted critical value limits for serum potassium at the clinical laboratory of Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, China are 3.0 mmol/l (lower) and 6.0 mmol/l (upper) for adult patients. These standard limits have been in use for 10 years, with no change in the electrode testing method during that time. It has been suggested, however, that laboratories should periodically review and revise their critical value limits, using appropriate clinical input, to ensure that urgent physician notification and patient evaluation and treatment are not hindered by unnecessary laboratory tests.¹³ Critical limits are designed to meet the clinical needs of each department, and if the clinicians are not satisfied with the critical limits in place, laboratories should re-evaluate their limits.¹³ Moreover, for laboratories dealing with diverse ethnic populations (such as those in China), it is important to establish critical values for each population to ensure that the limits reflect the needs of both clinicians and patients. In addition, an investigation into the critical values of over 200 hospital laboratories found that the occurrence rate of critical values was associated with the type of hospital (e.g. specialist hospital, tertiary or teaching hospital) and the requirements of priority determination (such as point-of-care tests and conventional tests);¹⁴ the study also suggested that more attention must be paid to the critical values determined from point-of-care testing methods as opposed to conventional tests.¹⁴ These data highlight a potential need to review and revise the accepted critical value limits periodically at hospital laboratories (detected by standard electrode methods, with inter- and intra-laboratory variation <5%).

Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo is a teaching hospital that receives referrals from local hospitals, resulting in a high number of patients with severe conditions requiring emergency treatment (and consequently a high percentage of patients with critical serum potassium values). In 2010, the incidence rate of critical values at the Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo clinical laboratory was 0.96%.¹⁵ The main aim of the present study, therefore, was to evaluate the association between critical serum potassium values and prevalence of clinical symptoms (e.g. neurological symptoms, hypodynamia, abdominal distension, loss of appetite, emesis, nausea, polyuria, chest distress [a subjective feeling of laboured respiration], tachycardia, dyspnoea, poor sleep quality, oliguria, hypotension, and dysphoria).¹⁶ In addition, the study aimed to clarify the validity of serum potassium critical value limits in use at the Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo clinical laboratory.

Patients and methods

Study population

The present retrospective observational study included sequentially enrolled adult inpatients (≥18 years) admitted primarily to the haematology, hepatitis, renal, intensive care unit (ICU), respiratory, hepatopancreatobiliary, cardiothoracic surgery, endocrine, urinary surgery, neurology, gastrointestinal, breast, orthopaedic surgery, or oncology departments at Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, Zhejiang University between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2012. Detailed data for these patients were routinely stored in the Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo laboratory database. In the present study, this database was only searched for Chinese Han ethnicity patients who recorded a serum potassium level of either ≤3.2 mmol/l or ≥5.8 mmol/l (i.e., close to the existing lower and upper critical limits for adult patients at Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, which were 3.0 mmol/l and 6.0 mmol/l) on or shortly after hospital admission. The following additional data were extracted: admission number; name; age; sex; diagnosis; clinical symptoms; serum potassium levels; department. Hyperkalaemia was diagnosed if the serum potassium value was >5.5 mmol/l; hypokalaemia was diagnosed if the value was <3.5 mmol/l.¹⁰ Haemolysed specimens were excluded; one value per patient was included; this was the first critical value obtained after hospital admission.

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, China and was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient at hospital admission.

Study design

Clinical data relating to each patient’s medical history report, detailed physical examination, and serum potassium levels were obtained. The detailed physical examination data included clinical symptom information relating to the nervous, digestive, respiratory and urinary systems. Electrocardiograms were routinely recorded in all patients, and results from electrocardiograms recorded when potassium values were ≤3.2 and ≥5.8 mmol/l were collected. Oliguria was defined as 6 consecutive h of urine output <0.5 ml/kg body weight.¹⁷ Polyuria was defined as urine output >40 ml/kg body weight over a 24-h period.¹⁸ The number of patients with relevant clinical symptoms (including neurological symptoms [absent, weakened or slow response to stimuli within or outside the central nervous system, drowsiness, numbness], abdominal distension, loss of appetite, emesis, nausea, polyuria, oliguria, chest distress [presence of a subjective feeling of laboured respiration], tachycardia [heat rate >100 beats per min], dyspnoea, insomnia [insufficient duration and/or quality of sleep], hypodynamia, hypotension [systolic/diastolic blood pressure <90/60 mmHg, respectively], and dysphoria [feeling agitated, stuffy, or distracted]) were determined.

The following criteria were used to determine critical patient status: presence of neurological symptoms (e.g. syncope and coma), and deterioration of at least two physiological systems (e.g. anuria [urinary system] and dyspnoea [respiratory system].¹⁶ The number of critical patients organized into different serum potassium level groups, and the number of patients with critical serum potassium values in different departments, were determined.

The Chinese hospital association guidelines state that serum potassium critical value limits should not be wide ranging, and critical value ranges should be agreed on by the clinical laboratory and clinical doctors. There are currently no defined criteria for determining critical serum potassium limits. Based on the present findings, then through discussion and consensus between the laboratory and clinical doctors, the lower and upper critical potassium limits were established.¹⁹

Data analyses

The percentage of patients with relevant clinical symptoms (out of all patients included), the percentage of critical patients (out of all patients with any relevant clinical symptoms), and the prevalence of clinical symptoms were calculated. The prevalence rate of clinical symptoms was calculated for different serum potassium levels as n clinical symptoms/n patients in each serum potassium-level group. The percentage of different clinical symptoms according to different serum potassium levels was calculated as prevalence of each clinical symptom/n patients in each serum potassium-level group × 100. Correlations between serum potassium levels and clinical characteristics were determined using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Prevalence rates were compared using χ²-test. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows®.

Results

A total of 3665 Chinese Han patients (mean ± SD, 38 ± 15.75 years; female/male, 1466/2199) with serum potassium values of ≤3.2 mmol/l or ≥5.8 mmol/l were included in the present study.

Clinical symptoms according to critical serum potassium levels

The number of clinical symptoms varied according to the serum potassium level (Table 1). In the low serum potassium groups (≤3.2 mmol/l), the percentage of patients with clinical symptoms and percentage of critical patients were lowest in the 3.1–≤3.2 mmol/l serum potassium group, and highest in the <2.4 mmol/l serum potassium group. In these low serum potassium groups, the total number of patients tended to increase, and the percentage of patients with clinical symptoms and percentage of critical patients tended to decrease, with increases in the serum potassium level (Table 1). This change was greatest between the 2.8–<2.9 mmol/l and 2.9–<3.0 mmol/l groups, in which the number of patients increased from 296 to 523; there was a proportional decrease of 14.3% in the percentage of patients with clinical symptoms (χ² value, 16.043; P < 0.001), and a proportional decrease of 4.9% in the percentage of critical patients (χ² value, 5.828; P = 0.016). These results were used to determine the lower critical limit.

Table 1.

Clinical parameters according to different serum potassium levels in 3665 patients admitted to Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, Zhejiang University, China.

	Parameter
Serum potassium, mmol/l	Patients	Patients with clinical symptoms	Critical patients	Prevalence of clinical symptoms	Prevalence rate of clinical symptoms
Low
<2.4	59	52 (88.1)	16 (27.1)	102	1.73
2.4–<2.6	163	121 (74.2)	23 (14.1)	264	1.62
2.6–<2.7	166	135 (81.3)	24 (14.5)	289	1.74
2.7–<2.8	201	153 (76.1)	23 (11.4)	375	1.87
2.8–<2.9	296	202 (68.2)	35 (11.8)	456	1.54
2.9–<3.0	523	282 (53.9)	36 (6.9)	552	1.06
3.0–<3.1	600	279 (46.5)	26 (4.3)	435	0.73
3.1–3.2	640	286 (44.7)	24 (3.8)	381	0.60
High
5.8–5.9	260	125 (48.1)	16 (6.2)	205	0.79
>5.9–6.0	261	126 (48.3)	15 (5.7)	216	0.83
>6.0–6.1	135	87 (64.4)	21 (15.6)	201	1.49
>6.1–6.2	90	56 (62.2)	12 (13.3)	126	1.40
>6.2–6.3	71	44 (62.0)	14 (19.7)	89	1.25
>6.3–6.4	49	34 (69.4)	9 (18.4)	86	1.76
>6.4–7.0	108	72 (66.7)	20 (18.5)	185	1.71
>7.0	43	38 (88.4)	14 (32.6)	90	2.09

Data presented as n, or n (%).

In the high serum potassium groups (≥5.8 mmol/l), the percentage of patients with clinical symptoms and percentage of critical patients tended to increase with increased serum potassium level (Table 1). For example, the total number of patients decreased by 126, and there was a proportional increase of 16.1% in the percentage of patients with clinical symptoms (χ²-value, 9.358; P = 0.002) and a proportional increase of 9.9% in the percentage of critical patients (χ²-value, 10.358; P = 0.001), in the >6.0–6.1 mmol/l compared with the >5.9–6.0 mmol/l group.

Correlation between critical serum potassium and other parameters

Low serum potassium levels (≤3.2 mmol/l) had a significant negative correlation with the percentage of patients with clinical symptoms, percentage of critical patients and prevalence rate of clinical symptoms (correlation coefficients = −0.929, −0.952, and −0786, respectively; Table 2). High serum potassium levels (≥5.8 mmol/l) had a significant positive correlation with the percentage of patients with clinical symptoms, percentage of critical patients, and prevalence rate of clinical symptoms (correlation coefficients = 0.833, 0.524, and 0.881, respectively; Table 2).

Table 2.

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients showing the correlation between serum potassium levels and clinical parameters in patients with low serum potassium and patients with high serum potassium, admitted to Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, Zhejiang University, China.

Clinical parameters	Low serum potassium ≤3.2 mmol/l		High serum potassium ≥5.8 mmol/l
Clinical parameters	r	Statistical significance	r	Statistical significance
Percentage of patients with clinical symptoms	−0.929	P = 0.001	0.833	P = 0.004
Percentage of critical patients	−0.952	P < 0.001	0.524	P = 0.010
Occurrence rate of clinical symptoms	−0.786	P = 0.021	0.881	P = 0.004
Neurological symptoms	−0.990	P < 0.001	0.972	P < 0.001
Loss of appetite	−0.770	P = 0.038	0.883	P = 0.005
Dyspnoea	−0.685	P = 0.045	0.326	NS
Oliguria	–	–	0.857	P = 0.003
Hypotension	–	–	0.864	P = 0.002

NS, no statistically significant correlation between dyspnoea and serum potassium levels in the high serum potassium groups (P ≥ 0.05).

Association between clinical symptoms and critical serum potassium levels

The clinical symptoms associated with hypokalaemia (<3.5 mmol/l serum potassium) mainly included neurological symptoms (such as apathy, depression, somnolence, and loss of memory and orientation), abdominal distension, loss of appetite, emesis, nausea, polyuria, chest distress, tachycardia, dyspnoea, insomnia and hypodynamia. Neurological symptoms showed a steady decrease in prevalence with serum potassium levels >2.4 mmol/l (P < 0.05). In pooled patients with serum potassium levels <2.7 mmol/l compared with ≥2.7 mmol/l, nine symptoms decreased (neurological, abdominal distension, loss of appetite, emesis, nausea, polyuria, chest distress, tachycardia and hypodynamia; P < 0.05). In patients with serum potassium ≥2.9 mmol/l, nine symptoms (all except nausea and insomnia) showed a statistically significant decrease (P < 0.05) compared with <2.9 mmol/l. Compared with pooled patients whose potassium levels were <3 mmol/l, those with serum potassium levels ≥3.0 mmol/l showed a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of all 11 symptoms (Table 3).

Table 3.

Prevalence of different clinical symptoms in patients with hypokalaemia (serum potassium <3.5 mmol/l) admitted to Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, Zhejiang University, China.

Clinical parameter	Serum potassium level, mmol/l
Clinical parameter	<2.4 n = 59	2.4–<2.6 n = 163	2.6–<2.7 n = 166	2.7–<2.8 n = 201	2.8–<2.9 n = 296	2.9–<3.0 n = 523	3.0–<3.1 n = 600	3.1–3.2 n = 640
Neurological symptoms^a,b,c	26 (44.07)	65 (39.88)	64 (38.55)	62 (30.85)	77 (26.01)	127 (24.28)	117 (19.5)	110 (17.19)
Hypodynamia^a,c	15 (25.42)	38 (23.31)	38 (2.89)	41 (20.40)	47 (18.24)	80 (15.30)	76 (12.67)	71 (11.09)
Abdominal distension^a,c	7 (11.86)	19 (11.66)	20 (12.05)	21 (10.45)	28 (9.46)	40 (7.65)	40 (6.67)	37 (5.78)
Loss of appetite^a,c	7 (11.86)	24 (14.72)	33 (19.88)	30 (14.93)	37 (12.5)	45 (8.60)	22 (3.67)	21 (3.28)
Emesis^a,c	5 (8.47)	6 (3.68)	19 (11.45)	16 (7.96)	14 (4.73)	21 (4.02)	24 (4)	25 (3.91)
Nausea^a	4 (6.78)	14 (8.59)	20 (12.05)	17 (8.46)	18 (6.08)	31 (5.93)	33 (5.5)	31 (4.84)
Polyuria^a,c	4 (6.78)	11 (6.75)	18 (10.84)	19 (9.45)	6 (2.03)	5 (0.96)	6 (1)	6 (0.94)
Chest distress^a,c	3 (5.08)	14 (8.59)	12 (7.23)	17 (8.46)	19 (6.42)	28 (5.35)	25 (4.17)	24 (3.75)
Tachycardia^a,c	4 (6.78)	3 (1.84)	17 (10.24)	15 (7.46)	17 (5.74)	25 (4.78)	25 (4.17)	24 (3.75)
Dyspnoea^c	4 (6.78)	14 (8.59)	16 (9.64)	14 (6.97)	25 (8.45)	34 (6.50)	31 (5.17)	29 (4.53)
Insomnia	2 (3.39)	7 (4.29)	7 (4.22)	7 (3.48)	12 (4.05)	21 (4.02)	25 (4.17)	24 (3.75)

Data presented as n (%) prevalence.

P < 0.05, pooled <2.7 mmol/l group compared with serum potassium levels ≥2.7 mmol/l group; ^bP<0.05, significant decrease in symptoms between all serum potassium groups; ^cP<0.05, pooled <2.9 mmol/l group compared with pooled ≥2.9 mmol/l group (χ²-test).

The clinical symptoms associated with hyperkalaemia (serum potassium >5.5 mmol/l) included neurological symptoms such as confusion and coma; loss of appetite; hypodynamia; dyspnoea; oliguria; nausea; emesis; chest distress; hypotension; abdominal distension; insomnia; dysphoria. There was a decrease in the percentage of nine clinical parameters (neurological; loss of appetite; hypodynamia; dyspnoea; oliguria; nausea; emesis; hypotension; insomnia) in pooled patients with serum potassium levels ≤7.0 mmol/l compared with levels >7 mmol/l (P < 0.05). In addition, there was a decrease in the percentage of ten clinical symptoms (neurological; hypodynamia; dyspnoea; oliguria; nausea; emesis; hypotension; abdominal distension; insomnia; dysphoria) in pooled patients whose serum potassium values were ≤6.0 mmol/l compared with >6.0 mmol/l (P < 0.05; Table 4).

Table 4.

Prevalence of clinical symptoms in patients with hyperkalaemia (serum potassium >5.5 mmol/l) admitted to Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, Zhejiang University, China.

Clinical parameter	Serum potassium level, mmol/l
Clinical parameter	>7.0 n = 43	7.0–>6.4 n = 108	6.4–>6.3 n = 49	6.3–>6.2 n = 71	6.2–>6.1 n = 90	6.1–>6.0 n = 135	6.0–>5.9 n = 261	5.9–5.8 n = 260
Neurological symptoms^a,b	15 (34.88)	27 (25.0)	12 (24.49)	16 (22.54)	15 (16.67)	14 (10.37)	20 (7.66)	18 (6.92)
Loss of appetite^a	6 (13.95)	13 (12.04)	7 (14.29)	9 (12.68)	11 (12.22)	11 (8.15)	22 (8.43)	21 (8.08)
Hypodynamia^a,b	4 (9.30)	8 (7.41)	6 (12.24)	7 (9.86)	9 (10)	13 (9.63)	12 (4.6)	10 (3.85)
Dyspnoea^a,b	7 (16.28)	12 (11.11)	7 (14.29)	8 (11.27)	10 (11.11)	10 (7.41)	16 (6.13)	12 (4.62)
Oliguria^a,b	12 (27.91)	24 (22.22)	6 (12.24)	6 (8.45)	11 (12.22)	13 (9.63)	22 (8.43)	16 (6.15)
Nausea^a,b	7 (16.28)	6 (5.56)	1 (2.04)	1 (1.41)	5 (5.56)	6 (4.44)	11 (4.21)	9 (3.46)
Emesis^a,b	7 (16.28)	5 (4.63)	1 (2.04)	1 (1.41)	6 (6.67)	5 (3.7)	10 (3.83)	9 (3.46)
Chest distress	1 (2.33)	13 (12.04)	2 (4.08)	3 (4.23)	5 (5.56)	8 (5.93)	15 (5.75)	13 (5)
Hypotension^a,b	14 (32.56)	20 (18.52)	5 (10.20)	7 (9.86)	10 (11.11)	12 (8.89)	14 (5.36)	8 (3.08)
Abdominal distension^b	3 (6.98)	4 (3.70)	5 (10.20)	7 (9.86)	4 (4.44)	5 (3.7)	11 (4.21)	8 (3.08)
Insomnia^a,b	3 (6.98)	5 (4.63)	3 (6.12)	4 (5.63)	5 (5.56)	4 (2.96)	7 (2.68)	5 (1.92)
Dysphoria^b	1 (2.33)	4 (3.70)	1 (2.04)	1 (1.41)	6 (6.67)	7 (5.19)	11 (4.21)	9 (3.46)

Data presented as n (%) prevalence.

P < 0.05, decrease in the percentage of symptoms (>7.0 mmol/l serum potassium group compared with pooled ≤7.0 mmol/l serum potassium group; χ²-test); ^bP < 0.05, decrease in the percentage of clinical symptoms (pooled >6.0 mmol/l serum potassium group compared with pooled ≤6.0 mmol/l serum potassium group; χ²-test).

Definition of critical value limits

The present results (without any predefined clinical cut-off values) were used for discussion between clinicians and clinical laboratory staff, to determine lower and upper critical serum potassium-value limits. Based on the present findings, 2.9 mmol/l was determined to be the lower, and 6.0 mmol/l to be the upper, critical potassium value limit.^17,18 These limits were determined not to alter the turnaround time of 6 h for biochemistry analyses in Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo clinical laboratory.

Distribution of critical values

A total of 1514 inpatients were found to have critical serum potassium (low/high) values during the study period according to the newly defined limits (2.9 and 6.0 mmol/l). The hospital distribution of patients with critical serum potassium values is shown in Figure 1: patients with critical serum potassium values were mainly distributed in the haematology, renal and hepatitis departments, and in the ICU. The hospital distribution of patients with critical hypo- and hyperkalaemia is shown in Figure 2: patients with hypokalaemia were mainly distributed in the haematology, renal, and hepatitis departments, and ICU; patients with hyperkalaemia were mainly distributed in the renal department and ICU.

Figure 1.

Hospital department distribution of patients with critical serum potassium values admitted to Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, Zhejiang University, China. ICU, intensive care unit.

Figure 2.

Hospital department distribution of the percentage of patients with critical hypo- and hyperkalaemia admitted to Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, Zhejiang University, China. ICU, intensive care unit.

Discussion

In this large-scale retrospective study, the association between critical potassium values and the clinical symptoms of inpatients was investigated to establish critical potassium value limits that were pertinent to the Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo. Serum potassium levels were found to be significantly correlated with the percentage of patients with clinical symptoms, the percentage of critical patients and the incidence rate of clinical symptoms. In Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, the laboratory technician follows a protocol for reporting any detected critical values, which includes sending a short message and a screen reminder to the physician, to which the physician may respond accordingly.¹⁵ Such a protocol suggests that critical potassium value limits that are based on clinical symptoms would be appropriate for clinical practice. At present, most reports have investigated the importance and clinical application of critical potassium values; to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no study has evaluated the association between critically low or high serum potassium values and clinical symptoms and disease severity, by searching the electronic medical records.^{10,11,20–24}

In the present study, the different clinical symptoms associated with hypo- and hyperkalaemia were assessed, and trends in changes in these parameters and clinical symptoms were further analysed. In the present study, the incidence of relevant clinical symptoms was used to determine the adverse effects of hypo- and hyperkalaemia. This implied that there were a variety of ways to define critical value limits, but analysis of clinical symptoms that closely associate with the patient's condition may be the most objective and effective method. Hypokalaemia is frequently encountered and hyperkalaemia is rare in Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, but both are potentially life-threatening emergencies.²⁵ Disorders in potassium homeostasis may influence many important physiological mechanisms and cause clinical symptoms.

Although many reports have focused on the pathological mechanisms, diagnosis and management of hypo- and hyperkalaemia, no study has investigated the association between different critical value limits and changes in clinical symptoms.^20–23

In the present study, the association between different critical serum potassium value limits and incidence of clinical symptoms was assessed. Based on the current 6-h turnaround time for biochemistry analyses at Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo clinical laboratory, the authors suggest that the lower critical value limit should be decreased from 3.0 mmol/l to 2.9 mmol/l, to decrease the number of callbacks and unnecessary notifications, and improve resource utilization; the upper limit should remain at 6.0 mmol/l. The critical limits suggested in the present study differ from those in other published studies. For example, a national survey on the critical limits used by trauma and medical centers in the USA suggested that the mean low and high critical potassium limits for the most frequently listed tests were 2.8 and 6.2 mmol/l, respectively,¹¹ however these limits were suggested for trauma and medical centres in the USA rather than tertiary hospitals per se in other countries, and the present study only included adult patients of Chinese Han ethnicity. A national survey of children’s hospitals in the USA determined that the mean low and high critical potassium value limits in children were 2.8 and 6.4 mmol/l respectively, although critical potassium values differ between adults and children, and the present study included adult patients (≥18 years of age) only.^12,26,27 In addition, the low and high critical potassium value limits defined at Zhongshan Hospital in China were reported to be 2.0 and 6.5 mmol/l.²⁴ However, unlike the present study (in which the correlation between serum potassium values and clinical symptoms were evaluated), the values defined at Zhongshan Hospital in China were based on the opinion of clinical experts without such evaluation of data.²⁴

In conclusion, critical serum potassium values were significantly correlated with relevant clinical symptoms in the present study. Critical serum potassium value limits of 2.9 mmol/l (lower) and 6.0 mmol/l (upper), based on clinical symptoms, were found to be appropriate for clinical practice at the Beilun People’s Hospital of Ningbo, China.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Shi

Liu

Wang

. The clinical significance of Aspergillus isolation from airway samples in critically ill patients. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2009; 32: 444–449. [in Chinese, English abstract].

Lundberg

. Critical (panic) value notification: an established laboratory practice policy (parameter). JAMA 1990; 263: 709–709.

Emancipator

. Critical values: ASCP practice parameter. American society of clinical pathologists. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 108: 247–253.

International Organization for Standardization ISO 15189: 2012. Medical laboratories–particular requirements for quality and competence, www.iso.org (2007, accessed 2 May 2012).

College of American pathologists laboratory general checklist [components GEN.41320, GEN.41330, and GEN.41340], http://www.cap.org (accessed 10 February 2011).

The Joint Commission. Accreditation program laboratory, 2012 National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG.02.03.01), http://www.jointcommission.org/ (accessed 2 May 2012).

Medical Doctor Association

Chinese

. Guide for implementation of patient safety goals, 2009–2010 ed. Beijing, China: Science Press, 2009. [in Chinese, English abstract].

Dighe

Rao

Coakley

. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center. Am J Clin Pathol 2006; 125: 758–764.

Kost

. Table of critical limits. MLO Med Lab Obs 2004; 36(Suppl 13): 6–7.

10.

Howanitz

Steindel

Heard

. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American pathologists Q-probes study in 623 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126: 663–669.

11.

Kost

. Critical limits for urgent clinician notification at US medical centers. JAMA 1990; 263: 704–707.

12.

Kost

. Critical limits for emergency clinician notification at United States children’s hospitals. Pediatrics 1991; 88: 597–603.

13.

Lum

. Critical limits (alert values) for physician notification: universal or medical center specific limits? Ann Clin Lab Sci 1998; 28: 261–271.

14.

Weber

Bissell

. Reporting panic values in the middle of the night. Clin Lab Manage Rev 1997; 11: 52–53.

15.

Yang

Zhou

Yang

. Analysis of laboratory repeat critical values at a large tertiary teaching hospital in China. PLoS One 2013; 8: e59518–e59518.

16.

Chen

Wang

. Surgery, 8th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2013, pp. 3.1–3.1.

17.

Legrand

Jacquemod

Gayat

. Failure of renal biomarkers to predict worsening renal function in high-risk patients presenting with oliguria. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 68–76.

18.

van Kerrebroeck

Abrams

Chaikin

. The standardisation of terminology in nocturia: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21: 179–183.

19.

Qiu

. The establishment of Hospital critical value project and report management. Exp Lab Med 2010; 28(1): 64–65.

20.

Lin

Halperin

. Hypokalemia: a practical approach to diagnosis and its genetic basis. Curr Med Chem 2007; 14: 1551–1565.

21.

Dussol

. Potassium physiology, hypokalaemia and hyperkalaemia. Nephrol Ther 2010; 6: 180–199. [in French, English abstract].

22.

Masilamani

van der Voort

. The management of acute hyperkalaemia in neonates and children. Arch Dis Child 2012; 97: 376–380.

23.

Lehnhardt

Kemper

. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of hyperkalemia. Pediatr Nephrol 2011; 26: 377–384.

24.

Yan

JSH

Yao

ZHR

. The association of serum potassium critical values and clinical practice. Shiyong Yixue zazhi 2011; 7: 1970–1973. [in Chinese, English abstract].

25.

Rastegar

Soleimani

. Hypokalaemia and hyperkalaemia. Postgrad Med J 2001; 77: 759–764.

26.

Campanozzi

Avallone

Barbato

. High sodium and low potassium intake among Italian children: relationship with age, body mass and blood pressure. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0121183–e0121183.

27.

Afridi

Kazi

. Evaluation of status of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium levels in biological samples in children of different age groups with normal vision and night blindness. Clin Lab 2011; 57: 559–574.

Evaluation of laboratory critical serum potassium values and their association with clinical symptoms in Chinese Han patients

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Patients and methods

Study population

Study design

Data analyses

Results

Clinical symptoms according to critical serum potassium levels

Correlation between critical serum potassium and other parameters

Association between clinical symptoms and critical serum potassium levels

Definition of critical value limits

Distribution of critical values

Discussion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interest

Funding

References