Abstract
Purpose:
To determine a valid and practical routine for glomerular filtration rate measurement in gynaecologic cancer patients.
Material and Methods:
The established method, endogenous creatinine clearance, was compared to 51Cr-EDTA clearance and contrast medium clearance in 68 women with various gynaecologic carcinomas. Contrast medium clearance was determined in association with conventional urography (iohexol 300 mg I/ml, 40 ml) for evaluation of urinary tract involvement by the tumour. Automated X-ray fluorescence analysis equipment was used for the plasma analysis of iohexol and clearance calculations. Endogenous creatinine clearance and 51Cr-EDTA clearance were determined according to standard routine procedures. Simultaneous determinations of contrast medium clearance and 51Cr-EDTA clearance (n=33), contrast medium clearance and endogenous creatinine clearance (n=50), as well as 51Cr-EDTA clearance and endogenous creatinine clearance (n=30) were compared.
Results and Conclusion:
The mean differences were −2.8 (SD 6.6), −1.8 (SD 22.3), and 2.7 (SD 18.3) ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. It is concluded that contrast medium clearance is as adequate as 51Cr-EDTA clearance for glomerular filtration rate measurement. We suggest that contrast medium clearance should replace endogenous creatinine clearance, especially in patients referred for urography.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
