Comparison between Conventional and Fast Spin-Echo Stir Sequences

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the common characteristics and differences in contrast behavior of short-TI-inversion-recovery (STIR) and short-TI-inversion-recovery fast spin-echo (TurboSTIR) sequences.

Material and Methods:

Phantoms doped with increasing doses of Gd-DTPA and a pork-fat phantom were used to evaluate the dependence of the STIR and TurboSTIR signals on the T1 relaxation time. Clinical TurboSTIR images were obtained from 30 patients with musculoskeletal abnormalities and compared to conventional STIR images in 15 cases and to postcontrast TurboSTIR images in another 15 cases.

Results:

In the phantom measurements, a significantly shorter inversion time (TI) was needed to achieve fat suppression on TurboSTIR images, and, with an identical number of signal averages, contrast-to-noise ratios were lower on TurboSTIR images. These differences between STIR and TurboSTIR can be attributed to the contribution of stimulated echoes to overall TurboSTIR signal and can be compensated by a shorter TI and a higher number of signal averages for TurboSTIR, respectively. With these adaptations, clinical TurboSTIR and STIR images showed an identical contrast behavior with fat suppression and a high sensitivity to pathological lesions but TurboSTIR saved a significant amount of scan time and reduced some types of artifacts. Contrast uptake impaired lesion conspicuity on TurboSTIR images.

Conclusion:

TurboSTIR sequences should replace conventional STIR sequences and should be performed before contrast administration.

Keywords

MR imaging,STIR sequence fast spin-echo sequence,Gd-DTPA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

L. L.

Goodman

S. B.

Perkash

Lane

Enzmann

D. R.

: Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies. Assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology 174 (1990), 495.

Bakker

C. J. G.

Witkamp

T. D.

Janssen

W. M.

: Short TI short TR inversion recovery imaging using reduced flip angles. Magn. Reson. Imaging 9 (1991), 323.

Bartolozzi

Caramella

Zampa

: MR imaging with STIR technique and air insufflation for local staging of bladder neoplasms. Acta Radiol. 33 (1992), 577.

Bottomley

P. A.

Foster

T. H.

Argersinger

R. E.

Pfeifer

L. M.

: A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms for 1–100 MHz. Dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. Med. Phys. 11 (1984), 425.

Bottomley

P. A.

Hardy

C. J.

Argersinger

R. E.

Allen-Moore

: A review of ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology. Are T1 and T2 diagnostic? Med. Phys. 14 (1987), 1.

Constable

R. T.

Anderson

A. W.

Zhong

Gore

J. C.

: Factors influencing contrast in fast spin-echo MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10 (1992), 497.

Constable

R. T.

Gore

J. C.

: The loss of small objects in variable TE imaging. Implication for FSE, RARE, and EPI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 28 (1992), 9.

Constable

R. T.

Smith

R. C.

Gore

J. C.

: Signal-to-noise and contrast in fast spin echo (FSE) and inversion recovery FSE imaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 16 (1992), 41.

Dwyer

A. J.

Frank

J. A.

Sank

V. J.

Reinin

J. W.

Hickey

A. M.

Doppman

J. L.

: Short-TI inversion-recovery pulse sequences. Analysis and initial experience in cancer imaging. Radiology 168 (1988), 827.

10.

Eng

Ceckler

T. L.

Balaban

R. S.

: Quantitative ¹H magnetization transfer imaging in vivo . Magn. Reson. Med. 17 (1991), 304.

11.

Fleckenstein

J. L.

Archer

B. T.

Barker

B. A.

Vaughan

J. T.

Parkey

R. W.

Peshock

R. M.

: Fast short-tau inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 179 (1991), 499.

12.

Henkelmann

R. M.

Hardy

P. A.

Bishop

J. E.

Poon

C. S.

Plewes

D. B.

: Why fat is bright in RARE and fast spin-echo imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2 (1992), 533.

13.

Hennig

Nauerth

Friedburg

: RARE imaging. A fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 3 (1986), 823.

14.

Panush

Fulbright

Sze

Smith

R. C.

Constable

R. T.

: Inversion-recovery fast spin-echo MR imaging. Efficacy in the evaluation of head and neck lesions. Radiology 187 (1993), 421.

15.

Piraino

D. W.

Hardy

P. A.

Schils

J. P.

Richmond

B. J.

Tkach

J. A.

Belhobek

G. H.

: Fast spin-echo imaging of the knee. Factors influencing contrast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 3 (1993), 835.

16.

Smith

R. C.

Constable

R. T.

Reinhold

McCauley

Lange

R. C.

McCarthy

: Fast spin echo STIR imaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 18 (1994), 209.

17.

Sattin

Mareci

T. H.

Scott

K. N.

: Exploiting the stimulated echo in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (I). Method. J. Magn. Reson. 64 (1985), 177.

18.

Stimac

G. K.

Porter

B. A.

Olson

D. A.

Berlach

Genton

: Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of spinal neoplasms. Preliminary investigation and comparison with spin-echo and STIR sequences. AJNR 9 (1988), 839.

19.

Tartaglino

L. M.

Flanders

A. E.

Vinitski

Friedman

D. P.

: Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine. Reduction with fast spin-echo tecniques. Radiology 190 (1994), 565.

20.

Tice

H. M.

Jones

K. M.

Mulkern

R. V.

: Fast spin-echo imaging of intracranial neoplasms. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 17 (1993), 425.

21.

Vinitski

Albert

Mitchell

D. G.

Tasciyan

T. A.

Rifkin

M. D.

: Partial angle inversion recovery (pair) MR imaging. Spin echo and snapshot implementation. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10 (1992), 207.

22.

Vinitski

Griffey

R. H.

: MR image contrast at high field strength. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1 (1991), 451.

23.

Wehrli

F. W.

MacFall

J. R.

Shutts

Breger

Herfkens

R. J.

: Mechanisms of contrast in NMR imaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 8 (1984), 369.

24.

Wolff

S. D.

Balaban

R. S.

: Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo . Magn. Reson. Med. 10 (1989), 135.