The non-ionic monomeric contrast media iopamidol and iohexol were compared concerning enhancement in the organs of the upper abdomen in CT. The average peak enhancement above the base line for the 2 contrast media in the liver, vena cava, aorta and spleen was calculated. No difference between the contrast media was found with regard to increase in contrast enhancement. No correlation between the peak enhancement and body weight and body surface was found with either of the 2 contrast media.
BurgenerF. A.HamlinD. J.: Contrast enhancement of hepatic tumors in CT. Comparison between bolus and infusion techniques. AJR140 (1983), 291.
6.
ClaussenC. D.BanzerD.PfretzschnerC.KalenderW. A.SchörnerW.: Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous contrast medium injection. Radiology153 (1984), 356.
7.
DeanP. B.KivisaariL.KormanoM.: Contrast enhancement pharmacokinetics of six ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Invest. Radiol.18 (1983), 368.
HalvorsenR. A.DunnickN. R.ThompsonW. M.: Contrast agent enhancement in abdominal computed tomography. Ionic vs nonionic agent. Invest. Radiol. Suppl (1984), 239.
10.
JensenL. I.GolmanK.NymanU.DeanP. B.: Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig. Invest. Radiol.20 (1985), 989.
11.
KormanoM.PartanenK.SoimakallioS.KivimäkiT.: Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen. Effect of contrast medium and body weight. Invest. Radiol.18 (1983), 364.
12.
NelsonR. C.ChezmarJ. L.PetersonJ. E.BernardinoM. E.: Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. AJR153 (1989), 973.
13.
NelsonR. C.MoyersJ. H.ChezmarJ. L.: Hepatic dynamic sequential CT. Section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. Radiology178 (1991), 499.
14.
PartanenK.KormanoM.KivimäkiT.SoimakallioS.: Comparison of iohexol and metrizamide in dynamic CT of the upper abdomen. Eur. J. Radiol.4 (1984), 227.
15.
RobbinsA. H.ThurmR. H.YehT.: Computed body tomography with iopamidol. Invest. Radiol. Suppl. (1984), 234.
16.
SagerE. M.ScheelB.TalleK.: Increased detectability of liver metastases by the use of contrast enhancement in computed tomography. A comparison between the precontrast, the immediate postcontrast and the one hour postcontrast scan. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis26 (1985), 369.
17.
SingerA. A.TagliabueJ. R.PaushterD. M.BorkowskiG. P.EinsteinD. M.: Comparison of iohexol-240 versus iohexol-300 in abdominal CT. Gastrointest. Radiol.17 (1992), 122.
18.
SkalpeI. O.: Enhancement with water soluble contrast media in computed tomography in the brain and abdomen. Survey and present state. Acta Radiol.Suppl. 366 (1983), 72.
19.
TidebrantG.LukesP.TylénU.: Contrast enhancement of liver parenchyma and biliary tract related to liver function at delayed computed tomography. Acta Radiol.31 (1990), 265.
