Sixty-two patients with pelvic fractures were evaluated by conventional radiography and CT. A correct pathoanatomic classification of the fractures was most often obtained by conventional radiography, but CT added information regarding acetabular fractures and involvement of the posterior part of the pelvic ring. Besides, CT was essential in the detection of intraarticular fragments and lesions of the femoral head. Classification of pelvic ring fractures by the pattern of traumatic forces was easily obtainable by conventional radiography, but often difficult to achieve by CT.
DockW.GrabenwögerF.SchratterM.FarrésM. T.KwasnyO.: Diagnostik von Beckenfrakturen. Beckenübersichtsaufnahmen versus CT. ÖÖFO150 (1989), 280.
2.
GillK.BucholzR. W.: The role of computerized tomographic scanning in the evaluation of major pelvic fractures. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am)66 (1984), 34.
3.
GriffithsH. J.Standertskjöld-NordenstamC. G.BurkeJ.LamontB.KimmelJ.: Computed tomography in the management of acetabular fractures. Skeletal Radiol.11 (1984), 22.
4.
HarleyJ. D.MackL. A.WinquistR. A.: CT of acetabular fractures. Comparison with conventional radiography. AJR138 (1982), 413.
5.
HoffmeyerP.SeigneJ. M.GarciaJ.VaseyH.: The value of computerized tomography in fractures of the pelvic ring. Int. Orthop.8 (1984), 1.
6.
HougaardK.LindequistS.NielsenL. B.: Computerised tomography after posterior dislocation of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br)69 (1987), 556.
7.
JudetR.JudetJ.LetournelE.: Fractures of the acetabulum. Classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am)46 (1964), 1615.
8.
LetournelE.: Acetabulum fractures. Classification and management. Clin. Orthop.151 (1980), 81.
9.
MackL. A.HarleyJ. D.WinquistR. A.: CT of acetabular fractures. Analysis of fracture patterns. AJR138 (1982), 407.
PetersJ.LörcherU.: Kombinationsfrakturen des Beckenringes. Vergleich der CT mit der Beckenübersichtsaufnahme. Digit. Bilddiagn.9 (1989), 140.
12.
RafiiM.FiroozniaH.GolimbuC.WaughT.NaidichD.: The impact of CT in clinical management of pelvic and acetabular fractures. Clin. Orthop.178 (1983), 228.
13.
RommensP.WissingH.SerdarevicM.: Die Bedeutung der Computertomographie für Diagnostik und Therapie der Frakturen des hinteren Beckenringes und des Hüftgelenkes. Unfallchirurg13 (1987), 32.
14.
RubensteinJ.KellamJ.McGonigalD.: Acetabular fracture assessment with computerized tomography. J. Can. Assoc. Radiol.33 (1982), 139.
15.
SchmittR.SchindlerG.GayB.BrendelH.RiemenschneiderJ.: Computertomographische Diagnostik bei Azetabulumfrakturen. RÖFO146 (1987), 628.
16.
TillieB.FontaineC.StahlP.CaillieretJ.DuquennoyA.: Apport de la tomodensitométrie au diagnostic et au traitement des fractures du cotyle. A propos de 88 cas. Rev. Chir. Orthop.73 (1987), 15.
17.
VasW. G.WolversonM. K.SundaramM.: The role of computed tomography in pelvic fractures. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.6 (1982), 796.
18.
YoungJ. W. R.BurgessA. R.BrumbackR. J.PokaA.: Pelvic fractures. Value of plain radiography in early assessment and management. Radiology160 (1986), 445.
19.
YoungJ. W. R.ResnikC. S.: Fracture of the pelvis. Current concepts of classification. AJR155 (1990), 1169.
