Thirty-six adult patients clinically suspected of small bowel obstruction underwent small bowel contrast radiography with either barium sulfate or a nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium after randomization. Films were taken after 2, 4, and 8 hours and later when needed. No difference as regards visualization and diagnostic quality was found between the 2 media. It is concluded that a nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium is an alternative to barium sulfate for small bowel contrast radiography where small bowel obstruction is suspected.
CohenM. D.TowbinR.BakerS.: Comparison of iohexol with barium in gastrointestinal studies of infants and children. AJR156 (1991), 345.
2.
LaerumF.StordahlA.AaseS.: Water soluble contrast media compared with barium in enteric follow through. Local effects and radiographic efficacy in rats with simple obstruction of the small bowel. Acta Radiol.29 (1988), 603.
3.
LangerR.KaufmannH. J.: The use of non-ionic contrast medium for gastrointestinal studies in infants. Radiology161 (1986), 229.
4.
MargulisA. R.BurhenneH. J.: Alimentary tract radiology, p. 87. C. V. Mosby, Toronto, 1983.
5.
RatcliffeJ. F.: The use of low osmolality water soluble contrast media in the pediatric gastrointestinal tract. Pediatr. Radiol.16 (1986), 47.
6.
RiveronF. A.ObeidF. N.HorstH. M.: The role of contrast radiography in presumed bowel obstruction. Surgery106 (1989), 496.
7.
StordahlA.LaerumF.: Water soluble contrast media in radiography of small bowel obstruction. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast medium. Acta Radiol.29 (1988), 53.
8.
StordahlA.LaerumF.: Comparison of water soluble contrast media and barium in rats with small bowel obstruction or ischemia. Invest. Radiol.23 (1988), 220.
9.
TrögerJ. B.Wendel-HoraB. I.: Gastrointestinal diagnosis with iotrolan. Experience in pediatric radiology. In:Recent developments in nonionic contrast media, p. 195. Edited by TaenzerV.WendeS.. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart1989.
