Coauthorship Trends in the Leading Radiological Journals

Abstract

Coauthorship trends have received limited attention in radiology. This paper examines the author inflation phenomenon in 12 leading radiological peer-reviewed journals and seeks explanations for the rise in multiple authorship. MEDLINE was searched from 1966 through 1991, and the indexed scientific material (67 758 articles) of the eligible core journals was analysed. During this 26-year period the average number of authors per original article (including case reports) doubled, increasing from 2.2 in 1966 to 4.4 in 1991. The linear regression model fitting the data was strongly significant, although since the late 1980s the rate of the coauthorship rise started to decrease. There was considerable variation in coauthorship patterns between journals. Other factors, such as the contributors' country, were also noted to influence coauthorship. The increasing complexity of radiological research explains in part the rise in multiple-author papers, but the main cause must undoubtedly be the excessive pressure to publish. Among the topics discussed are the incentives that stimulate radiologists to write, the dynamics of coauthorship, and the proposals made to standardize the requirements for authorship and to shift the emphasis from quantity of publication to quality.

Keywords

Radiology and radiologists,research authorship publishing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angell

: Publish or perish. A proposal. Ann. Intern. Med. 104 (1986), 261.

Anonymous : Author! (editorial). Lancet 2 (1982), 1199.

Ben-Shlomo

Goodman

: A place in the sun? Br. Med. J. 297 (1988), 1631.

Berk

R. N.

: Irresponsible coauthorship (editorial). AJR 152 (1989), 719.

Broad

W. J.

: The publishing game: Getting more for less. Science 211 (1981), 1137.

Burman

K. D.

: “Hanging from the masthead”: Reflections on authorship. Ann. Intern. Med. 97 (1982), 602.

Chew

F. S.

: The scientific literature in diagnostic radiology for American readers. A survey and analysis of journals, papers, and authors. AJR 147 (1986), 1055.

Chew

F. S.

: Coauthorship in radiology journals. AJR 150 (1988), 23.

Fotion

Conrad

C. C.

: Authorship and other credits. Ann. Intern. Med. 100 (1984), 592.

10.

Fye

W. B.

: Medical authorship. Traditions, trends, and tribulations. Ann. Intern. Med. 113 (1990), 317.

11.

Garfield

: Which medical journals have the greatest impact? Ann. Intern. Med. 105 (1986), 313.

12.

Huth

E. J.

: The physician as author of medical information. Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 61 (1985), 275.

13.

Huth

E. J.

: Abuses and uses of authorship (editorial). Ann. Intern. Med. 104 (1986), 266.

14.

Huth

E. J.

: Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Ann. Intern. Med. 104 (1986), 269.

15.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N. Engl. J. Med. 324 (1991), 424.

16.

Kassirer

J. P.

Angell

: On authorship and acknowledgments (editorial). N. Engl. J. Med. 325 (1991), 1510.

17.

Moulopoulos

S. D.

Sideris

D. A.

Georgilis

K. A.

: Individual contributions to multiauthor papers. Br. Med. J. 287 (1983), 1608.

18.

SCI Journal Citation Reports. Edited by Garfield

, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia 1979–1988 (10 volumes).

19.

Strub

R. L.

Black

F. W.

: Multiple authorship (letter). Lancet 2 (1976), 1090.

20.

Vannier

M. W.

: Research at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology. A strategic plan for the 1990s. AJR 159 (1992), 15.