MR relaxation times, fiber composition, nonmyofiber space, water content, and fat content of human psoas and multifidus muscle samples of 10 male cadavers were studied in vitro. The T1 and T2 relaxation times of multifidus muscle were significantly longer than those of the psoas muscle. On average, type 1 fibers (slow fibers with a small cross-sectional diameter) predominated in both muscles. There was no correlation between the relative mass of type 1 or 2 fibers (fast fibers with a large cross-sectional diameter) or nonmyofiber space and the relaxation times. The quantity of fat in the muscle did not correlate with the relaxation times either.
BeallP. T.: Practical methods for biological NMR sample handling. Magn. Reson. Imaging1 (1982), 165.
2.
BogdukN.: A reappraisal of the anatomy of human lumbar erector spinae. J. Anat.131 (1980), 525.
3.
BottomleyP. A.FosterT. H.ArgersingerR. E.PfeiferL. M.: A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1–100 MHz. Dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision and age. Med. Phys.11 (1984), 425.
4.
BulckeJ. A. L.BaertA. L.: Clinical and radiological aspects of myopathies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin1982.
5.
DixonW. J.: BMDP statistical software. University of California Press, Berkeley1983.
6.
DubovitzV.: Muscle biopsy. A practical approach, 2nd edn., p. 37. Bailliere Tindall, London1985.
7.
KoenigS. H.BrownR. D.IIIAdamsD.EmersonD.HarrisonC. G.: Magnetic field dependence of 1/T1 of protons in tissue. Invest. Radiol.19 (1984), 76.
8.
KomuM.AlanenA.MäättänenH.KormanoM.: Method dependence of the proton spin-lattice relaxation analysis in biological tissues. Acta Radiol.30 (1989), 97.
9.
KunoS.KatsutaS.AkisadaM.AnnoI.MatsumotoK.: Effect of strength training on the relationship between magnetic resonance relaxation time and muscle fiber composition. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.61 (1990), 33.
10.
KunoS.KatsutaS.InouyeT.AnnoI.MatsumotoK.AkisadaM.: Relationship between MR relaxation time and muscle fiber composition. Radiology169 (1988), 567.
11.
LamminenA. E.TanttuJ. I.SepponenR. E.SuramoJ. I.PihkoH.: Magnetic resonance of diseased skeletal muscle. Combined T1 measurement and chemical shift imaging. Br. J. Radiol.63 (1990), 591.
12.
MacIntoshJ. E.ValenciaF.BogdukN.MunroR. R.: The morphology of the human lumbar multifidus. Clin. Biomech.1 (1986), 196.
13.
McLachlanL. A.: Cancer-induced decreases in human plasma proton NMR relaxation rates. Phys. Med. Biol.25 (1980), 309.
14.
MansfieldP.MorrisP. G.: NMR imaging in biomedicine. In: Advances in magnetic resonance, Suppl. 2, p. 10. Edited by WaughJ. S.Academic Press, New York1982.
15.
MardiniI. A.McCarterR. J. M.FullertonG. D.: NMR relaxation times of skeletal muscle. Dependence on fiber type and diet. Magn. Reson. Imaging4 (1986), 393.
16.
MattilaM.HurmeM.AlarantaH.: The multifidus muscle in patients with lumbar disc herniation. A histochemical and morphometric analysis of intraoperative biopsies. Spine11 (1986), 732.
17.
MisraL. K.NarayanaP. A.: In vivo T1 characterization of genetically induced muscle atrophy. Magn. Reson. Imaging7 (1989), 277.
18.
NelsonT. R.TungS. M.: Temperature dependence of proton relaxation times in vitro. Magn. Reson. Imaging5 (1987), 189.
19.
ParkkolaR.KormanoM.: Lumbar disc and back muscle degeneration on MRI — Correlation to age and body mass. J. Spin. Disord.1 (1992), 86.
20.
PolakJ. F.JoleszF. A.AdamsD. F.: NMR of skeletal muscle. Differences in relaxation parameters related to extracellular/intracellular fluid spaces. Invest. Radiol.23 (1988), 107.
21.
ScholtzT. D.FleagleS. R.BurnsT. L.SkortonD. J.: Tissue determinants of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation times. Effects of water and collagen content in muscle and tendon. Invest. Radiol.24 (1989), 893.
