The viscosity of 7 contrast media was measured using a rotational viscometer. When solutions with similar iodine concentrations were compared, the highest viscosities were found for the nonionic dimers iodixanol and iotrolan, the lowest for diatrizoate, iopamidol, and iopromide, and intermediate values for iohexol and ioxaglate. The viscosity of iohexol and ioxaglate was found to vary linearly with temperature and quadratically with concentration. Whole-blood viscosity was measured for 5 subjects at high and low shear rates before and after mixing with contrast media in various proportions. Low-shear viscosity was found to decrease and high-shear viscosity to increase with contrast medium concentration. It is concluded that the contrast media currently used may affect blood rheology less than previous agents, despite their higher viscosity.
AlménT.: Contrast agent design. Some aspects of the synthesis of water soluble contrast agents of low osmolality. J. Theor. Biol.24 (1969), 216.
2.
AspelinP.: Effect of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on morphology of human erythrocytes. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis19 (1978), 675.
3.
AspelinP.: Effect of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity and hematocrit in vitro. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis19 (1978), 977.
4.
BerensonM. L.LevineD. M.GoldsteinM.: Intermediate statistical methods and applications. A computer package approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs1983.
5.
BjörkL.: Effect of angiocardiography on erythrocyte aggregation in the conjunctival vessels. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis6 (1967), 459.
6.
BjörkL.EriksonU.HoltzA.: Delivery rates of certain contrast media through catheters for angiography and cardioangiography. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis11 (1971), 586.
7.
BjörkL.EriksonU.IngelmanB.: Preliminary report on angiography with polymeric contrast agents in rabbits and dogs. Ups. J. Med. Sci.81 (1976), 183.
8.
CaroC. G.PedleyT. J.SchroterR. C.SeedW. A.: The mechanics of the circulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford1978.
9.
CokeletG. R.: The rheology and tube flow of blood. In: Handbook of bioengineering, p. 14. Edited by SkalakR.ChienS.McGraw-Hill, New York1987.
10.
DawsonP.HowellM.: The non-ionic dimers. A new class of contrast agents. Br. J. Radiol.59 (1986), 987.
11.
ErnstE.MonshausenC.MatraiA.: Blood viscosity — A comparative study in three rotational viscometers. Biorheology22 (1985), 471.
12.
FischerH. W.: Viscosity, solubility and toxicity in the choice of an angiographic contrast medium. Angiology16 (1965), 759.
13.
FischerH. W.: Catalog of intravascular contrast media. Radiology159 (1986), 561.
14.
FolkowB.NeilE.: Circulation, p. 26. Oxford University Press, London1971.
15.
GrollmanJ. R.: The importance of preheating contrast media. AJR142 (1984), 391.
16.
HalsellR. D.: Heating contrast media. Role in contemporary angiography. Radiology164 (1987), 276.
17.
HoeyG. B.SmithK. R.: Chemistry of X-ray contrast media. In: Radiocontrast agents, p. 123. Edited by SovakM.Springer-Verlag, Berlin1984.
18.
KrovetzL. J.FairchildB. T.HardinS.MitchellB.: An analysis of factors determining delivery rates of liquids through cardiac catheters. Radiology86 (1966), 123.
19.
LindgrenP.LöfströmB.SaltzmanG. F.: Intravascular erythrocyte aggregation after intravenous injection of contrast media. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis2 (1964), 334.
20.
LloydD. A.SteinJ. S.RoweM. I.: The effect of a hyperosmolar intravenous contrast medium on blood viscosity. Invest. Radiol.26 (1991), 220.
21.
MorrisT. W.KernM. A.KatzbergR. W.: The effects of media viscosity on hemodynamics in selective arteriography. Invest. Radiol.17 (1982), 70.
22.
RaininkoR.YlinenS.-L.: Effect of non-ionic contrast media on aggregation of red blood cells in vitro. Acta Radiol.28 (1987), 87.
23.
RandP. W.LacombeE.: Hemodilution, tonicity, and blood viscosity. J. Clin. Invest.43 (1964), 2214.
24.
RandP. W.LacombeE.: Effects of angiocardiographic injections on blood viscosity. Radiology85 (1965), 1022.
25.
SandhagenB.: Analysis of haemorheological variables — Methodology and reference values. Ups. J. Med. Sci.94 (1989), 81.
26.
Schmid-SchönbeinH.TeitelP.MalottaH.ÖzlenA.TietzG.: Einfluss eines nicht-ionischen Röntgenkontrastmittels (Iopamidol) auf die Mikrorheologie des Blutes. Röntgenpraxis36 (1983), 421.
27.
StäubliM.BraunschweigJ.TillmannU.: Changes in the rheological properties of blood as induced by sodium/meglumine ioxaglate compared with sodium/meglumine diatrizoate and metrizamide. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis23 (1982), 71.
28.
StreckerE. P.StengelM.WitteS.: Influence of an ionic and a nonionic (sodium meglumine diatrizoate and iopromide) X-ray contrast medium of haemorheology. In: Recent developments in nonionic contrast media, p. 24. Edited by TaenzerV.WendeS.Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart1989.
29.
StricklandN. H.DawsonF.RamplingM. W.: Blood viscosity changes induced by radiocontrast agents. Br. J. Radiol.63 (1990), 987.
