Mammography screening was carried out in 18012 women (aged 50–59) of whom 579 (3.21%) had to be recalled for clinical mammography. After completion of the clinical mammography each woman also had ultrasonography (US) with a hand-held real-time apparatus using a 7.5 MHz probe. There were 79 verified breast cancers; 32 of these were palpable and were also depicted at US, but only 29 (61.7%) of non-palpable breast cancers (n = 47) were found at US. Twenty-two of the non-palpable breast cancers were seen at US as a tumor-like lesion, 2 because of local echo-architecture distortion, and 5 only because of acoustic shadowing. The US image did not help to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions.
BakerL. H.: Breast cancer detection demonstration project. Five-year summary report. Cancer J. Clin.32 (1982), 194.
2.
BassettL. W.Kimme-SmithC.: Breast sonography. Technique, equipment, and normal anatomy. Semin. Ultrasound, CT, MR10 (1989), 82.
3.
BassettL. W.Kimme-SmithC.SutherlandL. K.GoldR. H.SartiD.KingW.III: Automated and hand-held breast US. Effect on patient management. Radiology165 (1987), 103.
4.
Cole-BeugletC.GoldbergB. B.KurtzA. B.PatchefskyA. S.ShaberG. S.RubinC. S.: Clinical experience with a prototype real-time dedicated breast scanner. AJR139 (1982), 905.
5.
Cole-BeugletC.SorianoR. Z.KurtzA. B.GoldbergB. B.: Ultrasound analysis of 104 primary breast carcinomas classified according to histopathologic type. Radiology147 (1983), 191.
6.
DeGezelleH.VanpeperstraeteA.DefoortP.SerreynR.VandekerckhoveD.: Comparison of breast tumours evaluated by ultrasound, mammography, and clinical investigation. Arch. Gynecol.230 (1981), 219.
7.
FieglerW.: Einsatzmöglichkeit der manuellen und automatisierten Scanverfahren bei der Mammasonographie. RÖFO138 (1983), 231.
8.
FleischerA. C.MuhletalerC. A.ReynoldsV. H.: Palpable breast masses. Evaluation by high frequency, handheld real-time sonography and xeromammography. Radiology148 (1983), 813.
9.
HeywangS. H.LipsitE. R.GlassmanL. M.ThomasM. A.: Specificity of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign breast masses. J. Ultrasound Med.3 (1984), 453.
10.
HiltonS.v. W.LeopoldG. B.OlsonL. K.WillsonS. A.: Real-time breast sonography. Application in 300 consecutive patients. AJR147 (1986), 479.
11.
Kimme-SmithC.BassettL. W.GoldR. H.: High frequency breast ultrasound. Hand-held versus automated units; examination for palpable mass versus screening. J. Ultrasound Med.7 (1988), 77.
12.
KobayashiT.: Ultrasound. Screening for early breast cancer by echography. In: Screening for cancer, p. 215. Edited by MillerA. B.Academic Press, Orlando1985.
PamiloM.AnttinenI.RoihaM.: Mammography screening for breast cancer. First year results from Helsinki and surroundings. Ann. Med.21 (1989), 277.
15.
PamiloM.AnttinenI.SoivaM.RoihaM.SuramoI.: Mammography screening — Reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall in the Finnish system. Clin. Radiol.41 (1990), 384.
16.
SicklesE. A.FillyR. A.CallenP. W.: Breast cancer detection with sonography and mammography. Comparison using state-of-the-art equipment. AJR140 (1983), 843.
17.
SicklesE. A.FillyR. A.CallenP. W.: Benign breast lesions. Ultrasound detection and diagnosis. Radiology151 (1984), 467.
18.
TabarL.FagerbergC. J. G.GadA.: Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the breast cancer screening working group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet1 (1985), 829.
19.
WagaiT.: Improvement of echographic breast cancer images and screening of breast cancer by ultrasound. In: Ultrasound 82, p. 215. Edited by LerskiR. A.MorleyP.Pergamon Press, Oxford1982.
20.
WagaiT.: Results of screening trials in Japan. In: Ultrasonic examination of the breast, p. 275. Edited by JellinsJ.KobayashiT.John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester1983.
