Method Dependence of Proton Spin-Lattice Relaxation Analysis in Biologic Tissues

Abstract

Spin-lattice proton relaxation times (T1) in several biologic and phantom samples have been measured and analysed by using standard inversion recovery (IR) and spin echo (SE) sequences at 0.02 T. The average T1 of the sample was measured with the two-data point method. In the case of bi-exponential relaxation the value of a single T1 is strongly dependent on the T1 and TR selected. With short TI the T1 value obtained by using the two point method is approximately equal to the weighted average of the two relaxation time components (T1s and T1l), while at long inversion times TI the single T1 is more dependent on the long component T1l. The more the true short and long relaxation time components T1s and T1l of the bi-exponential relaxation differ from each other, the greater is the potential error, provided that the weights w^s and w^l do not differ very much. When two-data point analyzing method is used, the possible multi-exponential behaviour of the relaxation in tissues will be missed. For more reliable T1 values a series of images with as many values of TI as possible should be taken. Knowledge of true multi-exponential relaxation parameters helps in optimizing the sequence parameters and the image contrast between the various tissues.

Keywords

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)relaxation time T1 multi-exponential relaxation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Bakker

C. J. K.

Vriend

: Multi-exponential water proton spin-lattice relaxation in biological tissues and its implication for quantitative NMR imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 29 (1984), 509.

2. Barroilhet

L. E.

Moran

P. R.

: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation spectroscopy in tissues. Med. Phys. 2 (1975), 19.

3. Beall

P. F.

Amtey

S. R.

Kasturi

S. R.

: NMR data handbook for biomedical applications. Pergamon Press, New York 1984.

4. Belton

P. S.

Jackson

A. R.

Packer

K. J.

: Pulsed NMR studies of water in striated muscle. Transverse nuclear spin relaxation times and freezing effects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 286 (1972), 16.

5. Bottomley

P. A.

Foster

T. H.

Arsinger

R. E.

Pfeifer

L. M.

: A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1–100 MHz. Dependence on tissue type NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. Med. Phys. 11 (1984), 425.

6. Bovee

W. M. M.

Getreuer

K. W.

Smidt

Lindeman

: Nuclear magnetic resonance and detection of human breast tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 61 (1978), 53.

7. Farrar

T. C.

Becker

E. D.

: Pulse and Fourier transform NMR. Academic Press, New York 1971.

8. Hazlewood

C. F.

Chang

D. C.

Nichols

B. L.

Woessner

D. E.

: Nuclear magnetic resonance transverse relaxation times of water protons in skeletal muscle. Biophys. J. 14 (1974), 583.

9. Koutcher

J. A.

Goldsmith

Damadian

: NMR in cancer. X. A malignancy index to discriminate normal and cancerous tissue. Cancer 41 (1978), 174.

10.

10. Le Rumeur

De Certaines

Toulouse

Rochcongar

: Water phases in rat striated muscles as determined by T2 proton NMR relaxation times. Magnet. Res. Imag. 5 (1987), 267.

11.

11. Medina

Hazlewood

C. F.

Cleveland

G. G.

Chang

D. C.

Spjut

H. J.

Moyers

: Nuclear magnetic resonance studies on human breast dysplasias and neoplasms. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 54 (1975), 813.

12.

12. Nummi

Alanen

Näntö

Kormano

: Effect of hemolysis and clotting on proton relaxation times of blood. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 27 (1986), 225.

13.

13. Pykett

I. L.

Rosen

B. R.

Buonanno

F. S.

Brady

T. J.

: Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 29 (1984), 509.

14.

14. Smith

M. A.

Taylor

D. D.

: The absence of tissue specificity in MRI using in vivo T1 or T2 determination. True biological variation or technical artifact?. Brit. J. Radiol. 59 (1986), 82.