Interobserver variation was estimated in radiologists' detection of duodenal ulcer and deformity of the duodenal bulb. A consecutive series of 156 patients with upper abdominal pain had a double contrast barium examination. The films were first read by routine by a specialist in radiology. A second reading was performed by another specialist who did not know the result of the first reading. Overall agreement between the two readings in the detection of duodenal ulcer and deformity of the duodenal bulb was 0.91 and 0.94, respectively. The overall agreement was adjusted for the expected chance agreement and kappa values were calculated. Kappa was 0.63 for the detection of duodenal ulcer and 0.85 for the detection of deformity of the duodenal bulb.
BirkeloC. C.ChamberlainW. E.PhelpsP. S.SchoolsP. E.ZacksD.YerushalmyJ.: Tuberculosis case finding. J. Amer. Med. Ass.133 (1947), 359.
2.
BlandJ. H.SouleA. B.Van BuskirkF. W.BrownE.ClaytonR. V.: A study of inter- and intra-observer error in reading plain roentgenograms of the hands. Amer. J. Roentgenol.105 (1969), 853.
3.
CohenJ.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. and Psychol. Meas.20 (1960), 37.
4.
ConnH. O.MitchellJ. R.BrodoffM. G.: A comparison of the radiologic and esophagoscopic diagnosis of esophageal varices. New Engl. J. Med.265 (1961), 160.
5.
DooleyC. P.LarsonA. W., Stace N. H. and coll.: Double-contrast barium meal and upper gastorintestinal endoscopy. A comparative study. Ann. Intern. Med.101 (1984), 538.
6.
EtterL. E.DunnJ. P.KammerA. G.OsmondL. H.ReeseL. C.: Gastroduodenal X-ray diagnosis. A comparison of radiographic technics and interpretations. Radiology74 (1960), 766.
7.
FleissJ. L.: Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Second edition. John Wiley, New York1981.
8.
FletcherC. M.OldhamP. D.: The problem of consistent radiological diagnosis in coalminers' pneumoconiosis. An experimental study. Brit. J. Industr. Med.6 (1949), 168.
GjørupT.AgnerE.JensenL. B.JensenA. M.MøllmannK.-M.: The endoscopic diagnosis of gastric ulcer. A randomized clinical trial of interobserver variation and bias induced by knowledge of the radiological diagnosis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. (1985).
11.
GjørupT.JensenL. B.JensenA. M.MøllmannK.-M.: The endoscopic diagnosis of duodenal ulcer disease. A randomized clinical trial of bias and of interobserver variation. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. (1986) (In press.).
12.
GjørupT.NielsenH.JensenL. B.JensenA. M.: Interobserver variation in the radiographic diagnosis of gastric ulcer. Acta radiol. Diagnosis26 (1985), 289.
13.
GoldbergD. P.SteeleJ. J.SmithC.SpiveyL.: Training family doctors to recognise psychiatric illness with increased accuracy. LancetII (1980), 521.
14.
HebertG. T.: Fibrosis of the lungs. Tubercle20 (1939), 145.
15.
HerlingerH.GlanvilleJ. N.KreelL.: An evaluation of the double contrast barium meal (DCBM) against endoscopy. Clin. Radiol.28 (1977), 307.
16.
JensenL. I.SørensenT. I. A.LaursenK.KleinH. C.PetersenO.: Reliability of evaluation of gallbladder X-ray examinations. Dan. Med. Bull.29 (1982), 305.
17.
JohnsonM. L.: Observer error; its bearing on teaching. LancetII (1955), 422.
18.
KoranL. M.: The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgements I—II. New Engl. J. Med.293 (1975), 642.
19.
KoranL. M.: The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgements I—II. New Engl. J. Med.293 (1975), 695.
20.
KramerH. C.: Ramifications of a population model for kappa as a coefficient of reliability. Psychometrika44 (1979), 461.
21.
LauferI.MullensJ. E.HamiltonJ.: The diagnostic accuracy of barium studies of the stomach and duodenum. Correlation with endoscopy. Radiology115 (1975), 569.
22.
McLachlanM. S. F.ThomsonJ. G.TaylorD. W.KellyM. E.SackettD. L.: Observer variation in the interpretation of lower limb venograms. Amer. J. Roentgenol.132 (1979), 227.
23.
MygindT.DorphS.Blichert-ToftM.PedersenM. L.SiemssenO.JacobsenG. K.: Mammography is an objective diagnostic method. Acta radiol. Diagnosis25 (1984), 189.
24.
NordenC.PhilippsE.LevyP.KassE.: Variation in interpretation of intravenous pyelograms. Amer. J. Epidemiol.91 (1970), 155.
25.
OttD. J.GelfandD. W.WuW. C.: Detection of gastric ulcer. Comparison of single and double contrast examination. Amer. J. Roentgenol.139 (1982), 93.
WrightE. C.AchesonR. M.: New Haven survey of joint diseases. XI. Observer variability in the assessment of X-rays for osteorathrosis of the hands. Amer. J. Epidemiol.91 (1970), 378.
28.
WulffH. R.: Rational diagnosis and treatment. Second edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford1981.
