CleareH. M.SplettstosserH. R.SeemannH. E.: An experimental study of the mottle produced by X-ray intensifying screens. Amer. J. Roentgenol.88 (1962), 168.
2.
HoljeG.SvahnG.: Test av förstärkningsskärmar. (In Swedish.) SPRI Report No. 6030: 9 (1974).
3.
MorganR. H.: The frequency response function. Amer. J. Roentgenol.88 (1962), 175.
4.
MorganR. H.Threshold visual perception and its relationship to photon fluctuation and sine wave response. Amer. J. Roentgenol.93 (1965), 982.
5.
NelsonA.: Determination of physical factors influencing the quality of the radiographic image. Acta radiol. (1949) Suppl. No. 76.
6.
ReichmannS.HelanderC.-G.: Homogeneity of intensifying screens. Acta radiol. Diagnosis15 (1974), 449.
7.
RöhlerR.: The modulation transfer function of intensifying screens. Problems of its definition and measurement. In: Diagnostic radiologic instrumentation. Chapter VII, p. 110. Edited by MoseleyR. D.RustJ. H.Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois1965.
8.
RoseA.: Vision. Plenum Press, New York1973.
9.
RossmannK.: Modulation transfer function of radiographic systems using fluorescent screens. J. opt. Soc. Amer.52 (1962), 774.
10.
RossmannK.Spatial fluctuations of X-ray quanta and the recording of radiographic mottle. Amer. J. Roentgenol.90 (1963), 863.
11.
RossmannK.Measurement of the modulation transfer function of radiographic systems containing fluorescent screens. Phys. in Med. Biol.9 (1964), 551.
12.
RossmannK.Comparison of several methods for evaluating image quality of radiographic screen-film systems. Amer. J. Roentgenol.97 (1966), 772.
13.
RossmannK.An approach to image quality evaluation, using observer performance studies. Radiology113 (1974), 541.
