AbderhaldenR.: Grundriss der Allergic Benno Schwabe & Co., Basel1950.
2.
AlyeaE. P.HainesC. E.: Intradermal Test for Sensitivity to Iodopyracet Injection, or ‘Diodrast’. J. A. M. A.135 (1947), 25.
3.
ArcherV. W.HarrisI. B.: An Ocular Test for Sensitivity to Diodrast prior to Intravenous Urography. Am. J. Roentgenol.48 (1942), 763.
4.
v. BraunbehrensH.: Allergische Zwischenfälle bei intravenöser Pyelographie. Münch. Med. Wochenschr.3 (1940), 1203.
5.
BromanT.OlssonO.: The Tolerance of Cerebral Blood-Vessels to a Contrast Medium of the Diodrast Group. Acta radiol.30 (1948), 326.
6.
BromanT.OlssonO.: Experimental Study of Contrast Media for Cerebral Angiography with Reference to Possible Injurious Effects on the Cerebral Blood Vessels. Acta radiol.31 (1949), 321.
7.
CrepeaS. B.AllansonJ. C.De LambreL.: The Failure of Antihistaminic Drugs to inhibit Diodrast Reactions. New York State J. Med.49 (1949), 2556.
8.
CriepLeo H.: Essentials of Allergy. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia 1945.
9.
DolanL. P.: Allergic Death due to Intravenous Use of Diodrast; Suggestions for possible Prevention. J. A. M. A.114 (1940), 138.
10.
GetzoffP. L.: Use of Histamine Antagonist in Intravenous Pyelography. New Orleans M. and S. J.101 (1948), 22.
11.
HanselFRK: Clinical Allergy. The C. V. Mosby Company, S:t Louis1953.
HorstersH.: Anaphylaktisches Zustandbild nach Injektion von monojodmethansulfosaurem Natrium (Abrodil). Med. Klin.27 (1931), 203.
14.
HultbornK. A.: Allergische Reaktionen bei Kontrastinjektionen für die Urographie. Acta radiol.20 (1939), 263.
15.
IdbornH.BergN.: On the Tolerance of the Rabbit's Kidney to Contrast Media in Renal Angiography. Acta radiol.42 (1954), 121.
16.
InmanG. K. E.: A Comparison of Urographic Contrast Media with particular Reference to the Aetiology and Prevention of certain Side-Effects. Brit. J. Radiol.25 (1952), 625.
MooreT. D.SandersN.: Reaction to Urographic Agents with and without Antihistamines. J. Urol.70 (1953), 538.
19.
NatermanH. L.RobinsS. A.: Cutaneous Test with Diodrast to predict Allergic Systemic Reactions from Diodrast given Intravenously. J. A. M. A.119 (1942), 491.
20.
OlssonOlle: Antihistaminc Drugs for Inhibiting Untoward Reactions to Injections of Contrast Medium. Acta radiol.35 (1951), 65.
21.
PendergrassE. P.ChamberlainG. W.GodfreyE. W.BurdickE. D.: Survey of Deaths and Unfavorable Sequelae following the Administration of Contrast Media. Am. J. Roentgenol.48 (1942), 741.
22.
PässlerH. W.: Die Angiographic zur Erkennung, Behandlung und Begutachtung periferer Durchblutungsstörungen. Fortschr. Röntgenstr. Erg. Bd.67 (1952).
23.
RobinsS. A.: Hypersensitivity to Diodrast as Determined by Skin Tests. Am. J. Roentgenol.48 (1942), 766.
24.
SandströmC.: Contrast Media for the Kidneys, Heart and Vessels, and their Toxicity. Acta radiol.39 (1953), 281.
25.
SchubertR.: Allergy due to iodine-containing Contrast-Media in Examination of the Kidneys. Ztschr. f. Urol.40 (1947), 76.
26.
TaubS. J.: Clinical Allergy, 2nd ed. Paul B. Hoeber, Inc., New York 1951.
