Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Medical students and junior doctors will likely use AI more frequently in the future, making their perceptions essential for identifying educational gaps.

Purpose

To explore the perceptions of UK medical students and junior doctors regarding AI in radiology.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional survey was distributed across UK medical schools and foundation programs. A total of 250 responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests, focusing on career impact, clinical effectiveness, educational development, and ethical concerns.

Results

Most respondents (55.2%) were undeterred by career uncertainties related to AI, with 64% confident that AI would not replace radiologists. Up to 80.6% supported AI's clinical benefits, and 63.2% endorsed its educational integration. However, there were concerns about job displacement and insufficient AI training. Medical students were more worried about job security than junior doctors, while those committed to radiology were less apprehensive and viewed AI as complementary.

Conclusion

Educational programs and regulatory frameworks are essential to facilitate AI integration in radiology. Addressing concerns about job displacement and improving AI education will be key to preparing future radiologists for technological advancements.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence radiology medical education junior doctors career perceptions diagnostic accuracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hosny

Parmar

Quackenbush

, et al. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer 2018;18:500–510.

Liew

. The future of radiology augmented with artificial intelligence: a strategy for success. Eur J Radiol 2018;102:152–156.

Litjens

Kooi

Bejnordi

, et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 2017;42:60–88.

McBee

Awan

Colucci

, et al. Deep learning in radiology. Acad Radiol 2018;25:1472–1480.

Esteva

Kuprel

Novoa

, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 2017;542:115–118.

Pesapane

Codari

Sardanelli

. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Eur Radiol Exp 2018;2:35.

Tang

Tam

Cadrin-Chênevert

, et al. Canadian Association of Radiologists white paper on artificial intelligence in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J 2018;69:120–135.

Cabitza

Rasoini

Gensini

. Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine. JAMA 2017;318:517–518.

Mazurowski

. Artificial intelligence in radiology: some ethical considerations for radiologists and algorithm developers. Acad Radiol 2020;27:127–129.

10.

Topol

. The Topol Review: Preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future. An independent report on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. London: Health Education England, 2019. Available at: https://topol.hee.nhs.uk/.

11.

Royal College of Radiologists. Artificial intelligence (AI). London: RCR, 2024. Available at: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/our-services/artificial-intelligence-ai.

12.

NHS AI Lab. NHS AI Lab Annual Report 2023. London: NHS England, 2023. Available at: https://transform.england.nhs.uk/ai-lab/.

13.

Santomartino

. Systematic review of radiologist and medical student attitudes on the role and impact of AI in radiology. Acad Radiol 2022;29:1748–1756.

14.

Chen

Zhang

Cai

, et al. Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: a systematic review with cross-sectional survey. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:990604.

15.

Bin Dahmash

Alabdulkareem

Alfutais

, et al.

Artificial intelligence in radiology: does it impact medical students’ preference for radiology as their future career?

BJR Open 2020;2:1.

16.

Sit

Srinivasan

Amlani

, et al. Attitudes and perceptions of UK medical students towards artificial intelligence and radiology: a multicentre survey. Insights Imaging 2020;11:14.

17.

Gong

Nugent

Guest

, et al. Influence of artificial intelligence on Canadian medical students’ preference for radiology specialty: a national survey study. Acad Radiol 2019;26:566–577.

18.

Stewart

Gahungu

, et al. Western Australian medical students’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence in healthcare. PLoS ONE 2023;18:e0290642.

19.

Sarwar

Dent

Faust

, et al. Physician perspectives on integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic pathology. NPJ Digit Med 2019;2:28.

20.

General Medical Council. Outcomes for graduates 2018. London: General Medical Council; 2018. Available at: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/dc11326-outcomes-for-graduates-2018_pdf-75040796.pdf.

21.

St Mart

Goh

Liew

, et al. Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery: transforming technological innovation in patient care and surgical training. Postgrad Med J 2023;99:687–694.

22.

Hantel

Walsh

Marron

, et al. Perspectives of oncologists on the ethical implications of using artificial intelligence for cancer care. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e244077.

23.

Grote

Berens

. On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare. J Med Ethics 2020;46:205.

24.

Codari

Melazzini

Morozov

, et al. Impact of artificial intelligence on radiology: a EuroAIM survey among members of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 2019;10:105.

25.

Rainey

O’Regan

Matthew

, et al.

Beauty is in the AI of the beholder: are we ready for the clinical integration of artificial intelligence in radiography?

Front Digit Health 2021;3:739327.

26.

Pedersen

MRV

Kusk

Lysdahlgaard

, et al. Nordic radiographers’ and students’ perspectives on artificial intelligence—a cross-sectional online survey. Radiography (Lond) 2024;30:776–783.

27.

Chen

Stavropoulou

Narasinkan

, et al. Professionals’ responses to the introduction of AI innovations in radiology and their implications for future adoption: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21:813.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB