Abstract
Background
The status of axillary lymph nodes (ALN) plays a critical role in the management of patients with breast cancer. It is an urgent demand to develop highly accurate, non-invasive methods for predicting ALN status
Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound radiofrequency (URF) time-series parameters, in combination with clinical data, in predicting ALN metastasis in patients with breast cancer.
Material and Methods
We prospectively gathered clinicopathologic and ultrasonic data from patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Various machine-learning (ML) models were developed using all available features to determine the most efficient diagnostic model. Subsequently, distinct prediction models were created using the optimal ML model, and their diagnostic performances were evaluated and compared.
Results
The study encompassed 240 patients, of whom 88 had lymph node metastases. A leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) method was used to split the entire dataset into training and testing subsets. The random forest ML model outperformed the other algorithms, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92. Prediction models based on clinical, ultrasonic, URF parameters, clinical + ultrasonic, clinical + URF, and ultrasonic + URF parameters had AUCs of 0.56, 0.79, 0.78, 0.90, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively, in the testing set. The comprehensive diagnostic model (clinical + ultrasonic + URF parameters) demonstrated strong diagnostic capability, with an AUC of 0.94 in the testing set, exceeding any single prediction model.
Conclusion
The combined model (clinical + ultrasonic + URF parameters) could be used preoperatively to predict lymph node status, offering valuable input for the design of individualized surgical approaches.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
